Jump to content

frollop756

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Hi, Sorry Forgot About The Statement Of Particulars Of Employment, This They Produced But It Has Never Been Signed And I Have Not Seen It. I Have Been Informed That Because This Wasn't Part Of The Et1 Claim I Cannot Now Add It Into The Hearing As Part Of My Claim
  2. Hi, I have a copy which does state i have a right to appeal if the action taken was unfair, this i did when they sacked me in my absence and that is when they stated a full re-hearing would take place. At the end of this re-hearing he upheld the decision of the previous manager and said his decision is final and did not offer me right to appeal as i had further doctors reports and information. should i have had the right to appeal again it does not say anything in the staff handbook about re-hearings.
  3. Hi, thankyou for the response, i had worked for them 11yrs.
  4. Hi, I am taking my former employer to a I.T. for failing to investigate... I was dismissed in my absence due to my failure to attend ( A CONSULTANT NEUROLOGIST STRONGLY ADVISED ME NOT TO DUE TO INVESTIGATIONS INTO MY CONDITION) this was advised to the discipline hearing and a sick note produced. I was later diagnosed as suffering from mini strokes which had an impact on my behaviour at work. When I appealed the decision the employer decided that they would hold a full rehearing of the original disciplinary. This was a farce but the question i would like to ask is "IF A REHEARING OF THE ORIGINAL DECISION DO YOU KNOW IF I SHOULD HAVE HAD THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THAT DECISION", does anyone know if any case law exists as they did not give me right to appeal. Or does anyone know of any case law re failing to investigate illness if used in mitigation.........Many thanks. I would appreciate any help as this company is very large and is using the best solicitors etc and i cannot afford to.......
×
×
  • Create New...