PS in this case shire are the funder

As i suspected to be the case, thank you, would this be a good grounds now to stop paying and start legal action, i can send you copy of agreement and forged doc to view if req, cheers chris. Ps reason for delay is that FOS has had it for 18 months, what a waste of tim e;;;

Hi, sweeney todd, i have a problem with shire leasing i wonder if you can help, would you be willing to give me your thoughts on the matter, which is quite complicated. In early 2007 i was contacted by shire to say funding was available for new equipment, i was looking for a new one man testing mot lift, and to cut a long story short put a supplier in contact with shire, from this point on i had no involvement in the negotiations other than being given a rough price by the supplier b4 putting him in touch with shire, until 26-06-07 when shire emailed me saying my agreement was attached and that they had spoken to the supplier about payment and delivery/installation. Up to this point i had no idea of the date or the cost of the payments. i refused to sign the acceptance and delivery note as obviously i had not even seen the equipment yet. It was delivered on 19-08-07 and the supplier commenced installation on 22-08-07. I was called back from holiday by a concerned employee and i expressed my concerns about the substandard installation immediately to the installer(still installing) and to shire leasing, telling them i was not happy with it and not to pay for it. They were pressuring me to say it was ok but i refused and subsequently never accepted or signed. Problems were immediately evident and despite following the complaints procedure to the letter, ie consumer direct, recorded delivery letters etc, no reply was rec from shire at all, it became unsafe and after having three independent inspections condemning the installation i was forced to stop using the lift, effectively closing me down, still no reply was rec from shire. they have denied joint and several liability under sec 75 cca, and thereby ensued a long and fruitless debacle with the FOS, culminating in them not upholding the complaint. In sept however i was accidentally sent from an employee at shire a copy of a fraudulently completed acceptance certificate. This is only the bare bones of the matter, as you can imagine, I have reported it to staffordshire police who investigated. What is your opinion on the acceptance, as this seems to be my only protection in the whole agreement and this has been fraudulently completed by overlaying my dd mandate over the sig box, (quite obviously). Also it has just come to light when i enquired who the funding was placed with that they, (shire) have funded it themselves;; I would be very grateful for your thoughts, Chris Seager Reading Drive In MOT centre PS Iwas a sole trader tover under 1000000 pounds therefore am a consumer under the cca as amended 2006-7