I thought I'd like to share with you what I have received. Initial thought on receiving this letter was, 21 days? quick, pay it! But on closer inspection of the letter I have a suspicion that it's not genuine. I have picked up on several pointers that you should all look out for. The letter is addressed by personal name in a clear windowed envelope, yet on opening it, the letter is addressed to 'Sir / Madam', now I don't know if you've ever received a legal document , but isn't a legal document that is sent from a solicitor normally started off with 'Dear Mrs Jo Bloggs' (example made up name used there) and not sir/ madam???!!!!! The other very major point is the signature of the letter. It goes on to say that the letter has been digitally signed because of the large volume of correspondence it's had to deal with. And do you notice it's digitally signed 'Davenport Lyons' and not a name of a legal representative for the company. No legal company sending out 'Letters of Claim' would send a letter demanding money with a digital signature. Every legal letter that is sent out, is written by a legal secretary and is handed over for a representative to sign on behalf of the company, and will bear the signatories name underneath. Also, if an order was made to Chief in Chancery Division of High Court dated 30 June 2008, why is it that I have only received a photocopy of the order and not received an original. And why have I only just received it in November........June was 5 months ago???!!!!!!! I will be seeking some form of legal advice on this matter. It's ringing alarm bells for me.