Originally Posted by ChessMaster

I am writing regarding the letter received from you regarding an outstanding debt registered against me by London Borough of Waltham Forest. I have received the letter by post this morning, 23rd March 2007, and the letter is dated 14th March 2007. The letter states 7 days to pay, and this time has already expired.

 

I phoned your number to pay by telephone, and the lady who answered was rude and abusive, and when I stated I wanted to pay by American Express card, her reply was ‘well we don’t take American Express, there’s nothing I can do.’ She the put the phone down on me abruptly.

 

Unfortunately, the only way I can pay is by cheque. Please let me know who I should make the cheque payable to and which address I should use.

 

Thank You

I agree with TM.

A blog would have been a better place.

I reckon!

So hopefully everyone happy now

Hello martin3030, can i ask why you have copied the post by coniff? If it was to suggest coniffs comments were not personal because coniff wrote It wasnt. Then I disagree, just because coniff wrote it wasnt dosnt mean it wasnt, that is why I wrote it was in my last post.

Anyhow, it dosent matter.....like I previously wrote, I didnt come onto the forum for advise (thankfully), I came on to the site out of interest, and maybe share stories. Coniff obviously didnt realise that from the thread!

You return from France and again try to reject the bike, this time in writing as is required.

I think you have totally lost the plot here and your right to your money back. You can't say you have lost confidence in it after taking it on a thousand mile round trip to France. In any case you would not get it all back as you have benefited from it and any repayment would be reduced taking this into account.

 

I would say the counterclaim stands a better chance of succeeding than your claim.

 

 

 

Your rejection has no substance until put into writing.

Obviously the Judge did not share your opinions Coniff

And the Judge deemed the counterclaim as ridiculous, as filing a counterclaim for defending a claim is not allowed.

Hi everyone,

I WON IN COURT ON FRIDAY

We all had a bit of a laugh ...... at the dealership, including the judge!! Their defence and presentation was a complete shambles, no dates on anything, no documents for anything, continuous contradictions throughout their entire statements .

It was awarded that they refund the total purchase price, the cost of the service, all my costs of taking it to court, and my costs for the day including my witness costs, including interest.

Hope all are well, Leo

Good luck mate I hope you win because this happens more than we realise

Thanks

Leo,

 

You came here looking for advice of which you succeeded but unfortunately your attitude to that sound and professional advice is such that I will be surprised if anyone offers you such advise again... Do not shoot the messenger just because he brings bad tidings my friend.....

Hello spedqeenbob, I didn't actually come on for advice...I came to read other peoples posts and maybe share stories!

What sound advise was I given, because it I could not see any?

I didn't expect to have someone trying to pick at everything I did (right or wrong) and post a load of false assumptions and accusations like wanting a new replacement bike when I said no such words!!

Then finishing it off with 'I think their counter claim has more strength than my claim'....that's not sound advise buddy....that's being an ass!

My attitude in response was off, I admit.....

I was caught off guard, and I lowered to it.

Received a 'General Form of Judgement or Order' from the courts yesterday!

Before DISTRICT JUDGE ????? sitting at ???????? County Court, The Shire Hall, ?????

Upon the courts own motion. The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days receiving it.

IT IS ORDERED THAT

Unless the defendant files an allocation questionnaire with the court office within three days of service of this order, the claimant shall be at liberty to enter judgement.

Dated 07 August 2008

I think all it means is that the dealer failed to file the allocation questionnaire within 14 days.

Nlr

NLR

hear hear conniff, the le mans trip is taking the pee a bit from the point of view of even the most helpfull retailer.

Providing a motorcycle with a defect such as this...........is taking the pee!

Refusing the customer his right to reject it....................is taking the pee!

Carrying out a service such as this..............................is taking the pee!

Not collecting the machine 3 days before the trip...........is taking the pee!

Supplying a motorcycle to take on the trip which is illegal.....

is taking the pee!

Writing a defence that I would not let them have it, when I have a letter from them that they are refusing the right to reject it because it is their right to repair it................is taking the pee!!

An helpful retailer would not have taken the pee in the first place!

NLR

Nlr

NLR

Nlr

Nlr

Nlr

Hi, I am new to this forum. I have posted my story (Dealer supplies new defective motorcycle which they did on PDI).

Hi to everyone, (especially admin and mods), this seems another great forum site.

Leo

Nlr