Jump to content

DaniPedrosa

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DaniPedrosa

  1. About two and a half years ago I had a current account with overdraft that was in credit

    when I used the account switching service to change to another bank after I became fed up with RBS and wanted to leave them.

     

     

    Today I received a letter claiming RBS have been trying to contact me as there hasn't been any money paid in to my account that RBS closed for me while in credit

    and transferred the credit balance to my new account with a different bank.

     

     

    The Sort Code of the account it is claimed I owe them money on is different from the sort code of my old RBS branch,

     

     

    I can not find anything at the moment to check if the account number is correct or not.

    :jaw:

  2. I would ignore the toothless Michael Sobell T/A Graham White Solicitors. A bit of digging around on Google will reveal all. Michael Sobell T/A Graham White Solicitors has been attracting unwanted attention from the Solicitors Regulation Authority of late. So he has to pretend to be a bit more than a serial threat o gram sender out 'til the SRA look the other way. You could research and consider making a complaint to the SRA.

     

    Also Roxburghe need to mind their P's and Q's as the OFT have made noises about revoking their consumer credit licence. If Roxburghe are not behaving themselves then you should also complain about them to the OFT.

  3. In the past I kept my letters to the DVLA short and to the point. I think it was the delightful Mrs Wooley who was insistant I had to pay a 'fine'. Simply tell the DVLA the SORN for vehicle XXXX XXX was posted first class in a correctly addressed envelope to them on XX day of XX month. Quote them section 7 of the IA 1978 and tell them you will not pay any 'fine' unless ordered to do so by a court.

     

    The DVLA will probably reply telling you that you still have to pay the 'fine' and it is your fault for not chasing them up after 4 weeks. However I can not find any mention of the need to chase the DVLA up after 4 weeks in any of the statutes I have looked at. You could ask the DVLA to name the particular law that enables them to impose this requirement upon you.

     

    If you feel like playing the DVLA at their own game. You can impose your own requirement upon them, as it has as much basis as their made up requirement in law. Upon every correspondence you have with the DVLA in large red lettering put 'If the DVLA have not received expected correspondence from harrison26 in respect of vehicle XXXX XXX the DVLA must within 4 weeks of not receiving the expected correspondence contact harrison26 to establish if the document has been posted first class.

     

    Or something similar.

  4. Did you post off your SORN to the DVLA first class? If you did you have fulfilled your statutory obligations. If you did post it first class the DVLA have to prove that you didn't. If you do post anything to the DVLA first class in future do it in the Post Office and get the free proof of postage from the person behind the counter.

     

    See section 7 of the Interpretations Act 1978.

     

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1978/30

     

    7 References to service by post.Where an Act authorises or requires any document to be served by post (whether the expression “serve” or the expression “give” or “send” or any other expression is used) then, unless the contrary intention appears, the service is deemed to be effected by properly addressing, pre-paying and posting a letter containing the document and, unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.

  5. The new rules give the PPC the 'power to persue the registered keeper' if a speculative invoice containing unenforceable penalty clauses is unpaid. But it is still a speculative invoice containing unenforceable penalty clauses, no matter who is 'liable' for it.

     

    The new law doesn't remove the previous hurdles for the PPC around contract law, penalty clauses, ownership of the land, ability to contract with motorists on land they have no interest in and an inability to proove what loss if any was suffered. It doesn't change anything as I see it.

     

    Read VCS v Ibbotson and HMRC v VCS.

  6. Good afternoon,

     

    I will attempt to give you all the relevant facts in the hope that someone can please point me in the correct direction.

     

    Since being made redundant I am now retraining in a different industry. My employer is kind enough to pay my uni fees in regards to my day release degree course. My degree course is a vital professional qualification in my new career.

     

    I have been told I can claim from HMRC the cost of the textbooks for my degree course and the cost of my 1 day a week train ticket to uni back. Is this correct?

     

    I have trawled the internet and HMRC website for hours but keep going round in circles and getting no closer to the answer.

     

    In my current trainee role I am on a modest salary and PAYE. In order to help ends meet I also work part time evenings and weekends in my friends shop. NB these earnings are also subjected to PAYE.

     

    Any help / pointers gratefully appreciated

     

    cheers

×
×
  • Create New...