Anyone ?

Yes he did, with over 30 pages of very credible evidence. The evidence the claimant used was very weak and based on five lines of comment that had the words "maybe " , "I cannot be 100% sure " and "very hazy memory". This was all in relation to an event. My brothers evidence from the SAME witness regarding the very same event had over 40 lines of comment ranging from "Very doubtful ", "I don't remember " , "highly unlikely" and " I don't really know ". All of which relates to the very same event. The judge found in the claimants favour. A solicitor charged my brother £35 to look at the case and exclaimed " The Judge and the Claimant must use the same lodge " hinting that both were masons. My brother will not under any circumstance pay on principle . He was denied an appeal. My brothers bank account is in joint names. Third Party Debt orders dont extend to joint accounts in this case. Anyway he dont have a pot to piddle in so that is not an issue. He is aware of that, but seeing has he dont own his house and has no intention of ever getting a mortgage, loan or anymore credit ( he has more credit cards then Richard Branson ) this will not be an issue.

Hi That's the point, there is no problem with the payment, it's just that he has no intention of paying the claimant. As I said in my original post he has good reason and I am not here to judge his motives . Providing the bailiff cannot touch the car. He has noting else of value.

Many thanks Andy I dont seem to be having much luck on here with any of my legal questions ! Pretty much as I have found with the CAB and CLS as well. I think it will be easier and less stressful for me to learn how to bend over and take it where the sun dont shine.

Can anyone suggest where I may get this information from ? The clock is ticking and there appears to be no help anywhere regarding this online . Every legal avenue I have gone down has been met with a dead end or stone wall silence.

My brother has a CCJ against him for £250. The person who took him through the small claims court has now taken enforcement action and the county court bailiffs have contacted him to say they will be paying him a visit. My brother has no intention of satisfying this debt ( he has good reason and I am not here to judge his motives ). He wants to know what the situation is regarding the car which sits on there drive next to the house ( no locking gates and no garage ). My sister in law is disabled and the car owner, but my brother is the registered keeper. He has to be because his wife does not drive ( its the way the disability tax system works apparently ). The original sales receipt for the car is in his wife's name, which they still have. I have read some vague information that you can write back to the bailiff to inform them ( including proof ) that although he is the registered keeper on the logbook, his wife is the owner of the car to make them aware prior to a visit ( I assume he will not be answering the door ). FWIW the car is 10 years old and worth around £300 on the open market and about £20 to a bailiff . Any definitive answers on this, or can anyone point me to a reliable source of information. Many thanks

How do I submit additional evidence to the court and other party after disclosure , but prior to the hearing ? Do I submit the additional evidence on the day of the hearing or do I give advance notice . Can anyone tell me the procedure ?

My main concern is still over this appeal procedure. I have tried calling and emailing the college of law but after a week an no answers I have given up. I have just over a week left before the hearing and have exhausted just about every other avenue of advice.

Yes they did, that was 2-3 months before the paperwork fell through the door.

Many thanks for that.

Can you give me any direct links or contact details for this please.

I am in court next month, If I win, I wont get a penny of this back for something I did not even initiate ? Am I missing something here or is this how the legal system works for those who can ill afford it ? The court is wrapped up in this " its for the people who don't require legal knowledge ", yet if something went wrong and I lost this case, I cannot appeal it unless it is on a point of law ? OK, so how do I " Its for the people who don't require legal knowledge " know what a point of law is..........when even the CLS, CAB and a solicitor cant tell me. What a weird system