on monday 4 march a equita bailiff walked into my shop and said i owed them 567.69 .for unpaid business rates,the bill started at 254.19 with charges of 313.50 .is this correct as i have had no letters saying that i owe them money they just turned up at my shop.he said they do not have to issue ant letters for a buisiness rate debt is this true some help would be a help.also he said his next collection was of a famous football player as his debt was a lot more than mine,this isnt allowed is it ,to discuss some one elses debt with me .

watch these baillifs,they once sent me a bill saying they had sent a van to my house with so many blokes little did they know i had a hidden camera recording 24 hrs,they soon dropped the charges when i rung them and told them about me recording ,they never came near my property

hi i had a visit of equita on monday.my debt was for 254.19,bailiffs cost 313.50.total debt now is 567.69,i have had no letters of them a bailiff just turned up at my shop walked in and said i owe them for my business rates,i said they hadnt sent me any letters regarding this debt and he said that they dont need to as it is a business debt,are these chrges correct as a small debt as doubled with there charges ,also he discussed a famous footballers debt to me,which was wrong