An update on this. I sent a 4 page letter detailing why I thought I was entitled to more compensation, including listing the tv I lost on Amazon (in America, not avail here now). It's listed at just short of $1900 over there (and I've looked - you just can't buy aluminium fronted tvs anywhere now - they're all plastic, so I guess that's why they are pricey?). Got a phone call today (I left it with them, didn't ring, didn't make any other contact) and they are settling my claim in full, with an apology for the messing about I've had to put up with (not to mention the squint from staring at a 14" portable the last 2 months). I'm not smug about it in any way, just relieved, and feel, finally, that I've got a little bit of justice. Bad enough to get burgled, worse to find out you'll only get half what you paid for the goods. So I've had full pay out (or slightly higher) on the laptop (£800) wife's handbag/purse/cash (claimed £70 got £90) the window to be repaired/replaced and the tv (paying out £947, todays exchange rate for a replacement from America). Thank you Churchill, for (finally!) helping me instead of making life harder! (I would have had to stump up at least £500 of my own money for a decent telly on top of what they offered. Now, I should be ok). I guess it pays to stand your ground, and don't take no for answer unless there is no other option, and be polite (where you can - easy to lose your rag when they told me 'like it or lump it' several times over the phone), and do your homework about the Financial Ombudsman Service. I'm just glad that (hopefully) everything is being settled, I can stay with Churchill and that life can get back to normal. With a bigger tv than the portable thing in the corner...

Agreed it was at the lower end of the scale - but only for Hi def TVs - normal definition LCDs were at or around 4-500 and plasmas were in the 800 region. To be honest the spec of the panel isn't the issue - they only come from 4 factories as far as I know so it's the driver that makes all the difference. What is the issue is that the TVs offered look cheap because they are cheap. My wife picked that TV because she liked the look of it, and won't want to put something cheap, plastic and with a rubbish name in the living room (e.g. Dae Who?) I'd rather put my hand in my pocket (again) and get something decent. The biggest issue I have is that I could have bought a £500 budget tv and had it replaced with the tv they are offering and been satisfied. I paid £920 and am being offered the same tv as if I'd bought the ****e one to start with. If you bought a Sony for a grand and were offered a Daewoo for £500 in 2 years time after it's stolen would you be happy? It's not just the panel that's different - it's the look, the build quality, the warrnaty, everything about the TV that you're paying for in the first place, and not getting with the replacement. I own a Rolex watch, a couple of Tags and a Tissot. The way things are going with Churchill, if I were robbed I'd expect them to offer a couple of Timex watches or 20 quid, nothing like the 5-6 grand value shelled out when they were bought.

Oh, and I referred the website of H&B to a lady from Empire Direct when I rang, and even she admitted that my TV looked far more expensive than the ones they sold and they wouldn't be able to come up with an alternative, suggesting that I told Churchill that and maybe I could find one of similar spec/look if I scoured around. Churchill weren't having any of it with a 'like it or lump it' attitude, the customer service robots (sorry to refer to them as that, but after half a dozen phone calls getting nowhere that's what they sound like) all quote 'like for like spec'. My TV had large detachable 'DolbyDigital 3D Effect' speakers on the side, a brushed aluminium bezel, s video socket and DVI socket, which I use for plugging into with the Geforce card on the computer. The replacements don't have those and I mentioned that, only to be treated with a head in the sand 'replace like for like spec' reply and rather smug 'thanks for calling Churchill' tacked on the end. I need to aim higher I think. Ground level seems to have a brick wall in the way...

Thanks for the reply - agreed. Everything I have suggested with regards the spec of the TV has had the customer service people put me on hold, ring Empire Direct and then come back with some argument that my television was inferior and that somehow these budget brands are better, even though the guy from Empire spent 5 minutes asking about the spec/type of my tv then later claimed to be some sort of expert and that mine was a budget brand. I wonder how someone who'd bought a Sony or Bose branded item would feel if in 2 years they were offered a Daewoo, LG, or the bottom of the range Toshiba item. What's worse is that because they are only offering what Empire sell, in this case a cheap black plastic TV, or refund the cost of a cheap black plastic TV (£477.75) I am going to have go out and spend extra to get the specification/look of television I want that goes with the furniture/decor of the room. Hardly 'like for like'. Their argument is that the specification of the LCD panel is the same or better. Well in that case they might as well give me a loose lcd panel in a cardboard box because it's of the same spec. I need to read their terms and conditions in the policy document. To me specification means everything listed as a feature, the techincal specification, the aesthetics (otherwise we would all buy the same looking tv), everything that comes with it, the warranty and so on. I didn't buy a rubbish television (at the time more expensive than a 42" plasma) but I'm being offered one as recompense. I guess the bottom line when dealing with Churchill Insurance is this: buy the cheapest, nastiest looking items you can, because that's all they'll be replaced with regardless of how much you spent! Not letting this one go. Expecting a similar fight with the laptop. Again, £800 worth 2 year ago, technology will have moved on so I can't expect like for like, but I dare say they'll be offering me a calculator or abacus with flashing lights on it if the TV claim is anything to go by...

Just done a quick tot up. The burglary has left me £1500 (£1000 to secure windows so they can't be accessed the same way, £500 loss on the tv) out of pocket so far with the claim (and doubtless loss) on the laptop still to come. I can't afford not to change insurance companies after all this is sorted out. They have the reciepts and proof of purchase and pay only half value - at that rate another burglary will leave the house contents more or less worthless unless I dig into my pocket again. Can anyone suggest a better insurance company? Dealing with Churchill has been bad so far, not something I ever want to repeat.

Hi all. A month ago I was burgled, they popped a downstairs window out and took the TV, Laptop, Wife's handbag and purse. After insurance co. (Chruchill) doing nothing for 3 weeks I finally got out of them after 3 or 4 phone calls wondering why that they needed a list of what had been stolen and proof of purchase. I wrote a letter expressing my dissatisfaction (why not tell me sooner? We've been squinting at a borrowed 14" tv for a month) I enclosed everything they asked for. Today I was called by Empire Direct who offered me a Daewoo tv. My original Tv was a little known brand called H&B whom EmpireDirects people hadn't heard of. I went into Empiredirect when I was looking for a TV and didn't like the stuff they sold, so went for this H&B one for £921 (when at the time in August 05 I could have bought an X Brand tv from Empire, Asda, anywhere, for £500). I wanted the best 32" I could get under £1000 as the wife didn't want anything bigger, and I wanted Hi Def (which was still new). H&B : Just because you need is the TV I had (hope it blows up on the thieving pikey **** who nicked it). For Empire/Churchill to first offer me Daewoo (which I rejected) then LG (again, another budget brand, rejected) then Toshiba - the cheapest model of their range at £470 (I think the others were at £400 and £450) is extracting the urine. I think the one they are offering is this one: Toshiba 32C3030DB Ctv Lcd 32" 16:9 Freeview W Table-Top S | EmpireDirect.co.uk Electrical Appliances I didn't buy a budget TV - I bought one I liked the look of and that did all the various bits I wanted when I hooked it up to a computer via the DVI socket. I realize that technology catches up and all TVs are high def now but for them to offer a TV of half the value then claim that it's not a budget television (Don't get me started on what I think of EmpireDirect - I didn't like them when I went into their shop so had half made up my mind to not buy there and go elsewhere anyway) is I think, rubbish. I'm expecting the same treatment from the laptop people. My initial reaction is to take the £470 settlement figure, wait for the one from the laptop, make sure the claim is fully settled then find another insurance company, that will exchange value for value or at least not make me feel like I've been robbed twice. Is there anything else I can do? Maybe find a Television from Empire Direct I'm happy with and ask for that instead? I think what made it worse was EmpireDirects sales guy offering the most rubbish television going, then the next one. At first he said he knew nothing about my brand of TV, asked me loads of questions, then later claimed mine was a budget brand! When I challenged him about his sudden new found knowledge he mumbled that his manager had sold them and worked in the business for a long time. This whole experience has been bad. Getting burgled is bad enough. Churchills shoddy treatment and insulting settlement offer makes me feel worse. Working hard to buy nice stuff, getting burgled and getting crap stuff in return sounds like I've done something wrong in a former life. Anyone have any advice? Or should I just bend over and take this? Thanks, Paul.