Wouldn't think for one minute that a site that gives people the advice of hide your car dont let bailiffs in would imply not paying in any way!

And where in the regulations does it state what your saying exactly?

It states It can be extended if it is applied for before the current warrant runs out! Where exactly does it state they can let the warrant run out then apply for a new one?

Didnt say it was did I so how about jump down off your high horse when you dont even know the full story! Already said thats a different ongoing matter if you read you will see!

So you saying a council is entitled to issue an incorrect Order of Recovery and claim on it when its wrong?

Thats the question I was asking!

Overall what I really want answering is are they allowed to keep applying for a warrant every time one runs out?

It was my understanding they were allowed to apply for an extension before the warrant ran out but once expired thats it end of it.

29/09/2015

Understand what you re saying but I been through these stages for the last 2 years with the other companies and they didn't get a thing neither will these guys.

As said £75 PCN + £7 court fee on the order does not make a total of £96 which they are trying to claim!

Just a quick one...what happens if the amount on the order for recovery is wrong? Would they have to reapply?

Anyone point me in the right direction on this?

Thanks

Yes received the first standard letter.

They are requesting the original PCN plus their £75 fee!

This is now the 3rd order for recovery and a different enforcement agent.

Thats what I am intending to do just need to know the legal bits surrounding it first.

That is my next step.

I am trying to gain information on the legalities of it first before I go to them as there does not seem to be much information on-line.

What I want to avoid is for me to ask them and them turn round and say 'because we can' without me been able to tell them the exact reason why they cannot.

This is what am looking to clarify.

I know its not the same type of thing but once a CCJ has been issued for example a company cannot keep applying for them for the same debt just enforce it.

Hi Ploddertom

Thanks for the reply.

Yes that's what I was under the impression of including as said above issue County Court proceedings if they choose.

I do not understand how they can issue an Order for Recovery each year then re-send to a bailiff company. It is this area I want to clarify.

Thanks

The original PCN was back in 2012.

I received the first order for recovery back in 2013 and it was then sent to newlyns.

After 12 months a 2nd Order for recovery was issued and again sent to Newlyns.

The regs had changed and I received the new letters with new charges but they never came and can only assume they returned it to the council as unable to collect.

In September I received a 3rd order for recovery and they have now sent it to Jacobs who have since issued the usual standard letters.

I have my reasons for not paying and will not deal with the bailiffs only the council but that is a separate matter.

I was under the same impression once they had issued the order that was it...up to the bailiffs company to collect and if they do not then the council can take other action such as county court claim etc.

What I'm wanting to know is how many times can they keep repeating this process as each time they are re-setting the time frame it lasts for under the new regs are they not?

Thanks in advance

How many times can a council take action on a PCN?

This will be the 3rd time this particular council has issued an order for recovery proceedings and we are now on the 3rd different bailif - Jacobs!

Isn't there a time when they can no longer keep re-issuing it and sending it to bailiffs?

Thanks

Yeah thanks for your so helpful comment stella can see why your part of the site team here

Should i just put up with people demanding money they have no legal entitlement to and threatening me with defaults on my file when i dont even owe the money? What kind of legal system even allows that?

For the rest of you that gave constructive advice thank you!

Thanks ill read up

No wouldnt class it as a serious breach standard letters and emails but unwarranted and unwanted.

When they choose to ignore then left with no option.

They keep sending me letters regarding a debt of over £2000 with a company I have never taken out a loan with.

Even after numerous communications saying a I do not owe this money and asking them to prove it in which the reply I got was the agreements were damaged in a flood which seen I have never had one they keep harassing me.

I wish to start a claim using money claim online to put an end to this and just wanted to clarify a few things:

Is it SLL Capital I list or Safeloand LTD t/a SLL Capital

When it asks me how much I am claiming would I put my costs incurred dealing with this in that section

Finally would I be able to use the Harrasment Act due to the unwarranted and unwanted letters and emails.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Thanks

If you are just claiming costs incurred, time spent on emails, letters etc is that the amount you place in the amount claimed section?

Thats the thing I do not have a contract with anyone.

I have been receiving letters from a debt company called SLL Capital who are a trading name of Safeloans Ltd for a debt of over £2000 in relation to some company called the Cash Store.

I have never taken out a loan with them and even after informing them of this they persist in harassing me. I have asked for proof to which I know they do not have any is its impossible but have gone through the motions.

Giving them one last chance and informing them I will take legal action they have still sent me letters so enough is enough.

Thats why I was wondering who i address the claim to and would it be harassment considering I do not owe this debt?

Thanks for the help

Hi guys

When you are issuing a court claim against a company using a trading name do you issue the claim against the parent company?

Thanks

Yep your right it does on that

I was searching the the Financial services register not the Interim

Thanks

The website I listed in op was for Oakam I just mistakenly listed an h in the title

I cant find on that website where it is

The number you listed comes up on the FCA Register as R & P Sales and Lettings Limited

Searching Oakam on the register brings up nothing either

I cant find an FSA Licence number for them anywhere

Dont intend to use them just after the info

Where did you get that number from silverfox?

The register is now the financial services register now isnt it which took over from the OFT consumer credit licence.

Thanks

Hi can anyone find where it states Oakham's Consumer Credit Licence number on their website? Either cant see wood for the trees or looking in wrong place! Thanks http://www.oakam.com/en/