itchynuts
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
1 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Posts posted by itchynuts
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.
Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access......debtor loses in court and ordered to pay bailiff companies legal costs
in Bailiffs and Enforcement Industry - General discussions
Posted
A debtor can remove right of implied access by displaying a notice at the entrance Lambert v Roberts [1981] 72 Cr App R 223. Placing such a notice is akin to a closed door but it also prevents a bailiff entering the garden or driveway, Knox v Anderton [1983] Crim LR 115 or R. v Leroy Roberts [2003] EWCA Crim 2753
administration and enforcement regulations 1992 regulation 45 para 7 a bailiff levying a distress may not commit an act of trespass the execute the levy. the human rights act states a public authority may not act in contrivention to a convention right, article 1 european convention of human rights- the peaceful enjoyment of ones possession.
also i believe a bailiff may not take personal computer equipment that may contain personal data as doing so could lead to a breach of the data protection act.
i have seen these posted some where and was wondering just how truthful this information was