I take it then that the parking bay just before the taxi rank was full then? Did she not try and explain to the warden what the problem was? Also, as she had literally just given birth, why was she driving? Sorry for the frank questions but this is what will be on the minds of whoever looks at an appeal. Presumably, you would be able to back up the situation with medical evidence as no doubt your wife would of needed some medical help... you may need to send a copy in with your appeal.

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

Gents,Pictures attached - are these road markings correct. In PCN2 I have highlighted where we parked.Any advice woudl be gratefully appreciated.Thanks

Would you mind reviewing this picture. This is the floor marking and the exact position we were parked in.

Yes it is... http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?num=100&hl=en&safe=images&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=kfc+high+wycombe&fb=1&gl=uk&hq=kfc&hnear=0x4876600361b47cc3:0xcd47a66f382f4def,High+Wycombe,+Buckinghamshire&cid=0,0,12557662652982840664&sa=X&ei=4XXxT-KSHsTa8AOO9KD6DA&ved=0CAoQrwswAAWould you mind explaining why this isnt a taxi rank please??

yes, the parking by the takeaways were full and short of stopping in the road, it was the only place, safe place, to stop.No, the wife gave birth 15th June, this was 28th June. However, my wife has suffered from a blood clot disorder and had to take a blood-thinner during the entire pregnancy, so she lost alot of blood during labour, she did have to have stitches as well – PLUS, she still has to inject the blood thinner, so her “loss of blood” still continues. Sounds dramatic I know, but she’s not bleeding all over the place, but she is bleeding still (slightly) and it's documented in her medical records. I’m concerned by my lack of “proof” and the fact I cannot contest we stopped in a taxi rank. But it genuinely was the safest place to stop until I got there. She did explain it to the traffic warden, but his response was “you still can't park there”. So what was the point in that

Image too small. Can you give us the location of the taxi rank please?

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

The exact location?Frogmoor in High Wycombe. Directly opposite this link: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?num=100&hl=en&safe=images&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=kfc+high+wycombe&fb=1&gl=uk&hq=kfc&hnear=0x4876600361b47cc3:0xcd47a66f382f4def,High+Wycombe,+Buckinghamshire&cid=0,0,12557662652982840664&sa=X&ei=4XXxT-KSHsTa8AOO9KD6DA&ved=0CAoQrwswAA

Picture attached...

Hi guys, rightly or wrongly I have a parking ticket and would just like some advice. My wife stopped and parked in ataxi rank, a clearly sign posted taxi rank and we're in breach of contraventioncode 45. The vehicle registration is correct, the Colour is correct, the tax disc is correct, the car make is incorrect. The observation time is the same as the issuing time, but I assume that won't matter because we were in a zone that is no stopping at any time. The situation was, my wife has literally just given birth, she was driving home with the baby and starting feeling dizzy and felt like she was bleeding, which it turns out she was. So she pulled over and stopped and rung me to come and get her. Whilst she was waiting, she got ticketed. There were two cars in the taxi rank as well which were not taxis. A Renault Clio (the ticket marks us as aRenault, when we are a Peugeot) and a Toyota Yaris. The person issuing wasn’t in full attire either. Trouser and a shirt. No high-vis jacket etc. Can we contest this? Will the safety issue of driving have any baring?? Can we use the incorrect information as something to argue this? Also – I don’t know if it matters, but the traffic warden didn’t take any photos. He just ticketed and walked off.

I was wondering if anyone on the forum had an idea of how long it takes for the Financial Services Ombudsman to finalise their reviews. We had our car stolen in February last year. Our Insurer, Swift Cover/AXA said that there wasnt enough theft damage to prove the car was stolen. They sent an email to the Ombudsman to us by mistake where they stated that they thought me and my wife either crashed the car ourselves or gave permission to someone else who we knew to drive and they crashed the car. Our defence to this is simple - we're fully comp, so if we did crash it, we would just pay our excess and get our money, but apparently that doesnt make a difference. So Swift refused to pay out, so we are appealing to the FSO, but so far, its been over a year.Is this normal?? How often to the FSO look at simple facts like - why would we lie, we're fully comp, so if we crashed it, so what, we still get paid. Also, we are being told that if the claim is upheld by the FSO, we are entitled to 0.8% in compensation of the value of the car PER DAY. So far, that would mean £6000 / 0.8% x 365 = £17520. Does this sound right?