Jump to content

chrismk

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chrismk

  1. Hi All,

     

    I wondered what peoples thought and opinions are on the following;

     

    My inlaws booked a cruise through New Market holidays, this was purchased and paid for on the 18th May 2015. They were asked if they wanted to take out travel insurance at the same time, they accepted and paid the premium along with the cost of the holiday. The insurance was underwritten by Allianz.

     

    Several days later an invoice arrived showing payment had been received, on the bottom of the invoice was a paragraph asking them to read page 4 of the insurance booklet relating to pre exisitng medical conditions, they couldnt do this as they were not in possession of it. They informed New Market who sent one out that arrived a week later. My father in law had had a minor heart attack back in 1994 and on page 4 it stated you would not be covered for any condition which was pre exisitng or were still being prescribed medication for. He is currenlty being prescribed Lisinopril and has been since 1994. Clearly confussion has been caused and they did not notify the insurance company as he did not think a heart attack in 1994 was a pre existing condition.

     

    Fast forward to june 15th, he has a major heart attack and cant go on the holiday, it is cancelled and a claim for cancellation is submitted.

    Allianz reject the claim as his medical notes from the doctor indicate his previous heart attack and current medication.

     

    At the point of paying for the holiday and the insurance no pre screening questions were asked about pre exisitng conditions. No attempt to assess the suitability of the policy for them was made, it was just a case of pay the premium and then read the booklet yourself to see if its suitable. Obviously this relies on correct interpretation and in this case that didnt happen.

     

    I would welcome thoughts on this, to me this seems to be an unfair way of sellng insurance. This product was purchased in good faith with the expectation of being covered. I would expect any declarations of pre exisitng conditions to be made prior to the insurance company offering a policy.

     

    Thank you

  2. Further to the above I have just spoken with the court and they tell me it is still listed to be heard on the 28th. The claimant did not pay the hearing fee back in mid October, they have been sent a reminder and given till the 17th to pay. To date they have not paid leading me to believe they will honour the agreement we made. Do I submit my witness statement this Friday (not done yet) or deliver a letter to court instead enclosing proof that the claimant said they were not proceeding?

  3. Not as such, they hadn't paid the hearing fee by the date specified in the directions and still haven't so it should be removed from the hearing list. Last I checked with the court it was still listed but i will check again end of the week. I have it in writing that they are not proceeding with the claim. I'm mindful that the case is scheduled for a hearing on the 28th but I'm sure it will be removed from the listing.

  4. Hi All, Parking Eye signage photos as promised from Newport Pagnell Services Northbound.

     

    p><p>
<img src=[/img]

     

    The picture above is taken from the area you said you parked, with the line of trees to the right and facing the motorway, there is 1 sign visible in the distance to the left.

     

    p><p>
<img src=[/img]

     

    The picture above is a general view take from the area you said you parked, the main service area is directly ahead in the photo.

     

    <a href=DSCN0248_zps2cdb0a23.jpg' alt='DSCN0248_

     

    The photo above is located by the entrance to the facilities as you walk across from the car park.

     

    I hope this helps you, if you zoom in on the photo you can read the small print at the bottom of the signage. if you need anything further including email copies of the pictures just let me know.

    • Confused 3
  5. Turned up at court this morning for the hearing scheduled at 10 only to be told the hearing had been vacated. It seems the claimant had received a copy of my witness statement, documents and evidence and thought better of it, they received this on the 12th of this month and on the 14th wrote to the court telling them the matter was settled and they were not proceeding. Obviously they didn't tell me so wasted some more of my time making me attend court to find out, even so I'm claiming this as a victory 😁

×
×
  • Create New...