Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot claim- Scared! Please help.


louisapj1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, first let me apologise for not reading through all the posts to check if this has been covered but I am nervous and stressed so hope I don't annoy anyone with this post.

 

I have had calls for a while from Cabot and (stupidly maybe) I avoided them.

I have now recieved a letter asking me to call which i did.

They explained I had an outstnding debt which had been passed on from Argos in 2006.

I explained that that was impossible as Argos passed my debt on to fredrikson in early 2003 and I settled it in Sept 2003.

 

I recently sent off for an Experian report and I have no outstanding debts.

I told the man at Cabot this is he stuttered a bit and said that it should be. At this point I became a bit suspicious.

I am certain that I settled all my outstanding debts in 2003 and (as a result of my damaged credit rating making this impossible, and me having learnt my lesson) have not accumulated any more debt.

 

Cabot told me to send of the reciept which i'm now rooting through 4 year old paperwork in the hopes of finding.

I 'm worried that it might be lost and have no idea what to do next.

 

Please could someone advise? Should I contact Fredrikson? Is there a chance that this could be some kind of hoax?

 

 

 

This was a debt that (along with many others to numerous store cards) I racked up as a naive, stupid and mis-guided teenager which I worked hard to rid myself of back in 2003 and was so pleased an relieved to have done so.

Now i'm worried that it's coming back to haunt me at a time when it's so important to me to remain debt free. I'm so worried :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both so much for your help and advice.

 

I can't believe they can get away with this, there must be tonnes of people out there who aren't lucky enough to know about forums like this and just pay up for the sake of peace and quiet.

 

Thanks again.:oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Louiseapj1 - the good advice from Seahorse and ODC is typical of the fantastic support you get from this wonderful site. You can be assured that they are right and you've no need to worry.

 

You are to be congratulated for working hard to clear your debt over the past few years, I'm sure it wasn't easy (it never is) and please take comfort in the knowledge that there is nothing Cabot can do to damage that.

 

Good luck

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both so much for your help and advice.

 

I can't believe they can get away with this, there must be tonnes of people out there who aren't lucky enough to know about forums like this and just pay up for the sake of peace and quiet.

 

Thanks again.:oops:

TELL ALL YOUR FRIENDS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesx tell them what a sad bunch of losers CRAPbot are and as for their Dear Leader well he knows what CAG and CFC think of his putrid policies

 

It's that CFC Again ! What is it? No? Who are they? It's

 

 

The CABOT FAN CLUB :D :D

 

 

Tell everyone Cabot are after to read up on CAG about us :D :D

 

 

Sarah ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I went to fill out the template letter, but it refers to account/reference numbers.

 

Cabot haven't actually supplied this reference, they simply said that the debt was passed to them by Argos (whom, as I stated, had already passed this over to Fredrikson whom I already settled with)

 

The only letter I have had was addressed to "the occupier" and just asked that they be contacted regarding my whereabouts (which scared my mum and so i called them, as explained above)

I definately don't want to call them again, having read through the cabot posts (which I wish I had done before I originally called them) and i'm sure they taped my call (as I was interrupted to be told "this call may be recorded or monitored..etc") and i'm now worried I may have somehow incriminated myself by admitting that I had a debt with Argos which was cleared with Fredrikson. :(

 

So having not actually been given a reference number, can anyone advise on where to start?

Seeing as my bill is already settled where have they even got my details from?

If I just ignore them completely what will happen?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might not be such a bad idea to go back to Argos and get them to deal with it. They must be aware the debt has been settled and as the Original Creditor they have a responsibility for what or who they assign a debt to. So get on to them, either write or phone and explain what is happening in their name, they won't like that and will no doubt have words with both Fredrickson and Cabot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for starters Capbot are breaking OFT guidelines and fishing for an account they "might" be able to collect on.

 

As Seahorse suggested I would send them a "prove I owe you" letter and go from there.

Also NEVER talk to a DCA on the phone as they will say anything to get payment out of you.

 

Edit as needed:

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its extremely unlikely that Crapbot will have taped this call.

 

They are the **** alleging the debt let them prove it exists and if so that they have a right to collect it.

 

Do not worry about them. There is nothing they can do over this non existant debt. They would need a CCA for the debt which you can be 100% certain does not exist.

 

Put them to the back of your mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right done and about to be posted.

I haven't signed it, I can just imagine them scanning my signature and putting it on whatever paperwork they want.... Or maybe I'm a bit paranoid! lol

You are being very sensible in not signing anything you send to a DCA. In these days of photoshop and cut and paste it pays to be careful. I always advise sending a postal order rather than a cheque for the £1 CCA fee. Unscupulous **** can obtain too much information from a cheque.

 

This is my opinion of course and would not for one moment suggest that any DCA would do anything which is unlawful or illegal and not in keeping with the OFT guidelines. The DCAs is this country are a credit to the industry they represent and are so pleasant to deal with.:rolleyes:

 

PS if you believe the last paragraph you will believe anything:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to everyone who has offered me advice so far.

 

I sent off the letter yesterday (recorded delivery of course) and have been reading through more posts today to get myself a bit more familiar with what will happen next.

 

I became more worried and impatient, not to mentioned stressed at having still not found my reciept for my final settlement to Fredrickson.

 

So I called them. Fredrickson that is, not Crapbot.

 

I didn't initailly tell them why I was calling (paranoia takes over again) I simply stated my old reference number from them and waited for the response...

The man on the end of the phone did seem to pause for a fews econds after he'd taken my details and his response was "right..... that's an old account...."

I replied "yes it is, one that I settled back in 2003"

He said "yes, that's correct"

BINGO!!

So I (in a moment of, perhaps misguided?, faith) explained that I am being pursued by Cabot even though I know that the account has been settled.

 

The Fredrickson (which is now something else.. some solicitors...) man told me to log onto Fredpay.com and I would be able to see details of my statements and prove to Cabot that I owe thwm nothing.

 

I told him how i'd heard on the internet that Cabot are a bunch of cowboys, out to try and rip people off and he, patiently (as he has to remain patient being as he is also, no doubt,working for a cowboy company) explained that Argos have recently sold all their accounts on to Cabot.....

Though I am still not sure how this affects me... as an EX-Customer.

 

So, what next? The online statement is quite plain, it has a few details of how much was owed and that it is settled but it doesn't look sustantial enough to send off as evidence.

Do I just continue to wait?

 

is there any chance I could still owe any money to Argos or wherever? surely they can't just change their minds, say it's not settled and sell it on??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you not ask the nice chap you rang at Fredriksons to confirm the account was settled fully in writing - please pretty please... Just so you can get rid of that nasty Cabot firm and seeing as he acted so professionally etc...:D Then post a copy to Cabot and tell them to naff off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...