Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson and Shark debt collectors...not even my debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6062 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Consumer forums

I am currently being perused by the idiots at Robinson, Prey & Co . (the shark pun is intended).Allegedly I owed £20 to Paypal Europe from 2002?? Not my debt as far as I am aware!!

I received the first demanding letter in July 2007…same old rubbish…threats and yellow paper..

I replied in writing to ask for evidence of the debt saying that the onus was on the debt collecting company to collect the evidence.

Low and behold…two months later they sent me the big big evidence….which consisted of…. an email address I have no knowledge off ?? No more information…no contract nothing!!

Consequently I ignored them

Subsequently, during August the persistent phone calls began and I persistently ignored them J. However I was caught on a bad day and I answered a call from them. I was very cleverly manipulated into talking to them by a very skilled shark. EEEKKKK . The nice Shark from RWC (with glass in her teeth) said it was a pay\pal account registered to an email address that was registered in my name. I denied all knowledge and she advised that I contact Paypal to prove my innocence. (I thought we were innocent till proven guilty??) Never mind!! The shark suggested that I was a victim of fraud and Paypal would investigate fully. The shark said that I could prove my innocence by contacting paypal fraud squad.

I can’t contact paypal I protested!!! Because I don’t have a paypal account to investigate!!! But the shark could not compute this data as she was only a sea animal with a brain smaller than an amoeba…

Anyhow, the story moves on…I sent them another letter telling them if they insisted upon telephoning my home I would peruse a criminal offence of harassment.

Plus I told them that they needed as the creditors to prove the debt is belonging to the debtors named!! Which by the way was not me...but an email address i had never hear off...

 

Are you still with me?:shock:

Bloody shark has ignored my requests and is still ringing my home….and what is worse they have asked for my telephone number at work!!! Even though I told them it is not appropriate to call me at work!!

How can I get it though these collectors R&W (the dumb sharks) that I do not owe this debt of £20

There is no proof I owe this debt as far as i can see

And please stop ringing me at home and causing me grief and do not ring my work as it is inappropriate.

And i haved asked and asked then to please send me a contract that says I owe this debt so I can take it court! But it appears the sharks are deaf!!:?

Can i actually take them to court asthey are harassing me unduely..me thinks:rolleyes:

I'm more sinned against

Than a sinner

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and by they way...

While i was llking through my files ..

In 2005 i also recieved a letter from a comapny called NCO asking for payment in dollars.

 

I had never heard of this debt too

 

Is there any link??

I'm more sinned against

Than a sinner

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they phone and ask for me now, i say, oh hi, i will go and get him, i turn up the music and put the phone by by the stereo.

nearly 9 minutes is the longest they have held on so far before hanging up.

Works for me.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NCO also work for Paypoo.

 

I have had similar experiences with NCO.

 

If you dont owe Paypal go get a solicitor and start aProtection from harassment claim against them.

 

What you need to do is send them a SAR telling you want every last scrap of data which concerns you as a data subject or which contains your personal data.

 

They have 40 days to provide this. Once you get it, it will show where they got your phone number from and every other bit of data you need to nail them for harassment.

 

Alternatively- are you 100% sure that you dont owe Paypal £20?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could get BT's choose to refuse and add their number to the no accept calls from list. There is also a letter you can send them telling them to desist and contact you by letter only. The letter is on this site in a templates library, but I am new and i cannot find it again easily, maybe someone more familiar with what is where here can help. Also, maybe get your post moved to dca section for more help ? Lot of people having problems with robinson way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thus will not stop until you have their nads in a vice. Sorry to be brutal, but that is the truth.

 

They are hoping you will send them £20 to make them go away.

 

If you owe them £20, pay them.

 

If not, make them pay dearly for their harassment of you.

 

Youve already sent them a letter before action.

 

Now go see a solicitor and make it happen, or ask how to do it on here.

 

I'm sure it could be done quite simply through Small Claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...