Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Never thought that i would find my self saying this, but I used to be a man


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6063 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have to say that it did stick in my craw a bit, but it was worth it for the look on the aussies faces - priceless, and of course the excuses started when Australia had lost 3 wickets !!!

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

The look on Punters face was priceless.....although I thought the smile was going to be wiped off my face when someone mentioned Duckworth-Lewis:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

and then we go and beat them today - the arch crims tomorrow, hopefully, with the shambles that they look at the moment, we will royally stuff them, I dont care about winning the 20/20 world championship as long as we stuff the aussies lol

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a dream last night, that we beat the Aussies at Cricket and then stuffed South Africa in the Rugby !!!!

 

( another note to self.....Stop eating cheese before you go to bed :D )

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep and although we lost Collingwood was a master strategist in deciding to have a bat first - that way, there was no way that they could thump us and land us with a NRR lower than Zims, and i hadnt even thought of that - bloody genius!!

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What? Where?

 

Now, come on if you're going to discuss such boring subjects, somebody has to spice it up a bit to avoid people falling asleep.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Balls and stumps oh and players red stains umpires leg before!!! and other strange sayings
Indeed. The whole thing is quite bizarre.

 

For anybody who doesn't know what cricket's all about, let me explain. (Although I don't really know myself, this is just what I have grasped from the bits I have managed to see before falling asleep...)

 

Cricket as a game is not what I would call 'an exciting spectacle'. Come to think of it, there is literally nothing in life that I would call 'an exciting spectacle', as this is a phrase that I have never used, and will never use.

 

Although having said that, in the fourteen seconds it took me to think of the phrase and type it, I have come to feel rather fond of it. Perhaps I should start using it.

 

On the minus side, I've noticed that I've become quite prone to italicising words to place stress on them (if you don't know what italicising means, I'm afraid I can't help you, because you are eyewateringly stupid). I don't agree with excessive italicising as I think it is sloppy. Therefore, from now on, the deal is: more exciting spectacles, less italics.

 

Anyway, cricket. In my opinion, cricket is not an exciting spectacle. Not as exciting as, say, watching a retired chiropodist driving a motorcycle and sidecar on a Wall of Death, with a leopard in the sidecar, in Leatherhead, Surrey.

 

No sirree.

 

You'll have gathered, if you have read this far - and apologies if you have, this really is going absolutely nowhere interesting - that the voluntary watching of cricket is one of the many phenomena in this carnival of insanity we call 'life' that I find baffling. That there are people presently existing on our planet, sentient people, who would choose to watch a game of cricket being played, keeps me awake at night, disturbs me (though perhaps not as much as the fact that I am writing this, right here, right now).

 

It's not just the watching of the cricket though. There is also the phenomenon of 'going to watch the cricket' in a live setting. I find it mind-bogglingly, full-on eppy mental crazy that people would pay to go to "the Oval" or "the Triangle" (or whatever the other places are called) to watch a game of cricket being played. Not only that, but the fact that they would utilise a portion of the energy reserves available to them to move one leg in front of the other in a manner that carried them, either entirely on foot or via some other means of transport, such as a motor vehicle, or an omnibus, or a train, or even a bicycle, but I digress, to the aforementioned temple of cricket.

 

I haven't even mentioned yet the fact that said persons travelling to said temple of cricket to watch said sport probably thought, when they awoke the morning of their visit to the cricket, about what they might wear there. They actually used up precious moments of life thinking "will the slacks be uncomfortable or should I go for the jumbo cords?"

 

What's more, they possibly spent a good part of the day - while they were at work, or maybe while tending to their offspring (not in a dodgy sense, you understand) thinking about the cricket-based revelries to come. Actually cricket matches seem to be played during the day, so perhaps in these situations they look forward to the cricket-based revelries to come whilst actually watching them. This is how wormholes form in the fabric of time, according to my Readers Digest Book of Made-up and Briefly Amusing Absurdities.

 

Why do they do it? For anyone who doesn't know what cricket is, here is a definition (just realised that's what I said I was going to explain, so here goes I'll finally do it): two men (women are forbidden by law from playing cricket by the Women and Cricket Act, 1981) stand in a field with a load of other men standing around watching them. One stands in front of some whittled down planks, whilst holding another plank in his hand which has been whittled down but not quite as much as the ones behind him. The man without the planks has to throw a ball at the planks behind the other man, whilst he tries to hit the ball back at him with his plank. Then somebody thought that was a little boring so for some unkown reason when the ball is hit by the plank the man runs around the field for a while, whilst the other men on the field go and look for the ball. The man who runs the most wins a game (called a Crick). Whoever wins the most Cricks wins the entire Match and has to shout "I AM CRICKET" to seal the victory. Ridiculous.

 

What other sporting event would require spectators to travel to a place that is named after a geometrical form, then sit in rigid silence, without even the possibility of being allowed out to enjoy a snack or a chat with a friend, for up to seventeen hours? Pro-celebrity ludo? Perhaps. Then again, perhaps not, as this does not exist. Yet.

 

Ok, as Americans often start their sentences, so it's theory time.

 

Next time you happen to catch cricket on the television, take a good look at the crowd. I mean, a really good look. In fact, a gooooood look. Their blank stares. Their beige cardigans. Their palpable approval of tinned 'travel' sweets dusted in icing sugar. Their attention, focused - uncannilly, wordlessly, even psychically - on the same thing. What does this all mean? Let's take a look at the evidence.

Dead-eyed crowd

Beige cardigans

Geometrically-themed venue

'Umpire' and 'players'

13 men in the field

Green field

Weird trousers

Cricket ball

You might want to sit down before reading my conclusions. Comfy? Westside.

 

Dead-eyed crowd - Chosen ones preparing for the final reckoning

Beige cardigans - Symbolically also worn by Four Horsemen of Apocalypse

Geometrically-themed venue - Actually just a fad

Green field - Obviously represents Garden of Eden

13 players - Can it be coincidence that there were 13 people at the last supper? Is there a hitherto-unbeknown cricket reference in Da Vinci's famous painting? No. Of course there's not.

'Umpire' and 'Players' - Father, Son and Holy Spirit

Weird trousers - Extra pockets handy for storing valuables while soul ascends to Heaven

Cricket ball - Represents purity of the soul

 

 

What I'm trying to tell you is that, when you watch a cricket game on television, you are witnessing that most exciting of spectacles, the actual fulfilment of the prophesy of Revelations from the bible - ie the end of the world. The ultimate battle between good and evil.

 

 

Just thought you should know.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fly_glasses.jpg

 

Seen it all, worked at Trent Bride House which overlooks cricket ground of said name, when big sides got there it was like parking got took over and had to pay even though worked there, work, well sad gits watched for free from office windows, us proper workers got interupted by resounding cheers or other explitives when every ball got bowled (that ws a hard one to type)

Take it it's not cricket for one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

For anybody who doesn't know what cricket's all about, let me explain. (Although I don't really know myself, this is just what I have grasped from the bits I have managed to see before falling asleep...)

 

There are two sides, one side out in the field and the other side inside.

Two of the men that are inside go out because they are in and when one of them is out he comes inside and another man goes in until he's out. When a man goes outside to go in, the men who are already outside try to get him out, and when he is out he comes inside and the next man in the side inside goes outside because he’s in. When all of the men (except one of course), who are in the team that is in are out everybody comes inside and the side that's been in goes outside and tries to get those coming in out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out and, if they feel like it, they come inside and then the other side which was inside is in and has to go out.

 

There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. These two men are appropriately dressed in white coats and wear several hats and jumpers. They have pebbles in their pockets.

 

When all the men in each side have been in and are all out, they go in and do it all again until they are all out again. Finally, when the sides have been in and all out twice, both sides come inside, that is the end of the game and one side wins. This doesn’t happen very often.

 

Sometimes, if one of the sides is not out because their men are still in and the other side has scored more, it’s a draw. This should not be confused with a tie, which is not the same thing.

 

Another reason why neither side wins is that, unlike all other team field sports, if it rains, nothing happens. Sometimes, nothing happens for five days, in which case both teams wear sunglasses, play cards, look through the windows and then go home.

 

Armed with this information, Barracad, you will now be able to fully appreciate the game of cricket and enjoy the cut and thrust of England’s premier summer sport.

 

Next week: Fielding Positions

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

Armed with this information, Barracad, you will now be able to fully appreciate the game of cricket and enjoy the cut and thrust of England’s premier summer sport.

 

That's basically what I said, except you missed out the tinned travel sweets and beige cardigans.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...