Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Westcott Credit Services - Debt


simon4amiee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Some time ago, my wife took £10 from a HSBC cashpoint, as it happens she only had £9.63 in the account, this took her overdrawn and she was charged, she then paid the amount owed, but becasue it wasn't in the banks calender month, it triggered another charge, which she was reluctant to pay and hasn't, very stubborn women, she refuses to pay £30+ quick for a charge she already paid, and for going overdrawn, when the expalanation she was given was HSBC round theirs up to the nearest pound, hense the charge that followed anyway its been left and left and left it is now at £420.31 owed, because of this 37p overdrawn charge. She now banks with a different bank, but the letter is now at the pay in 7 days or go through Couty Court proceedings. I said let them take you to court, last time that happened with me over a £300 debt I only had to pay £5 a month, and as our finances are the same as then, can't see the court refusing this, but will take em 7 years to collect the debt. What others views.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife should send them the SAR letter and advise she is going to be claiming back her bank charges.

 

That should stop them in their tracks - your wife claiming before they can.

 

Although the case will be "stayed", follow the procedure outlined on here so that your wife's case is in the queue for when they "un" stay them.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't help though really, I was going through an agency and they said they wouldn't do anything unless it was over £800 of debt, mine must have run unto thousands no word of a lie, yet they came back and said it added to £400 in charges, my backside it did, I was overdrawn every month for 6 years then accepted the charge, then add on the cancelled DD etc, no way was it £400 so I never accepted the offer. anyway, I think it stinks my wife is now £420 in deby becasue a computer system rounded her account up and she went 30 odd pence overdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only way not to let them get away with it is to reclaim the charges - you neevr know, there may be more on there.

 

Once the account is in dispute, they cannot proceed with collection action upon it until the dispute is resolved.

 

Either that, or you can wait for it to get to County Court and make a counterclaim.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would start with papers being served for a CCJ.

 

You then can choose whether to admit, defend some of the claim, defend all of the claim or counterclaim. You would require HSBC to disclose all of the information they have in order to submit your defence/counterclaim. Then, your wife would calculate her bank charges, plus interest etc, and using the many good arguments you will find in the litigation section here, try to prove that the charges are unlawful.

 

With the fact that there are stays being put on so many cases, I don't know whether the Judge would accept your counterclaim or would stay HSBC's case.

 

It might be worth going down the SAR route etc as HSBC might settle before court and refund the charges/clear up your wife's credit record. But it is really up to you.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any tips on a counter claim, what is it etc were would I start, any help appriciated!

 

I'm assuming that you haven't yet received a courts claim, so there is no requirement for a counter claim as yet. I'd follow tigs' advice and send them a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for both yours & her indoors accounts.

 

Data Protection Act - Subject Access Request Generator *** New ***

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank is NatWest who do I send the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to, Ive had a quick look on here but couldn't find an address.

 

You'll find an address in here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/

 

Send the SARs today

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...