Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what the latest data on school suspensions tells us about the UK education system and early intervention.View the full article
    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

beboii vs First Direct


beboii
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well here goes .... the DPA letter went today. Recorded delivery.

 

I have statements going back about three years and there are nearly two grands worth of charges on those including a memorable seven direct debits returned in one month because of an excess overdraft fee. Truly eye watering. Lord alone knows what the final total will be.

 

I have a parachute deployed and its good to know that there is a lot of support and previous experience to fall back on in these threads.

 

Can't wait to see what happens, will keep you posted

 

b

Link to post
Share on other sites

a memorable seven direct debits returned in one month

 

It wasn't memorable in a good way... but getting it back will be!

 

Good luck!

A&L: Settled - £6,200

HFC: Settled - £800

Shell Visa: Settled - £250

Egg: Settled - £700

Mint: Settled - £1200

RBS: Settled - £850

 

The opionions in this post are guaranteed to conform to the laws of physics, but pretty much nothing else...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received a letter from FD by return saying they would provide the data requested and returning my cheque. No statements as yet but hopefully it won't be long. I'll chase it this week.

 

A similar letter has gone to capital one, they haven't even acknowledged it yet. will start a thread in the appropriate place when they do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang FD on Thursday to chivvy them along, statements arrived within 48 hours. Have gone through them once, the charges are about £2000.00, going back to check them again now - would hate to miss anything.

 

First Letter requesting a refund will be in the post first thing Monday morning.

 

Incidently Capital One cashed my cheque but haven't yet seen fit to drop me a line acknowledging it or advising me of an expected delivery date of the data - shameful!

 

Toodle Pip

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I got standard "cause to complain letter" handsigned it is. they have sent me a very useful leaflet too about the banks complaints procedure. Looking forward to Monday next when the LGA goes in the post....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the sound of an "LGA".

 

Last Gasp Attempt?

A&L: Settled - £6,200

HFC: Settled - £800

Shell Visa: Settled - £250

Egg: Settled - £700

Mint: Settled - £1200

RBS: Settled - £850

 

The opionions in this post are guaranteed to conform to the laws of physics, but pretty much nothing else...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah the post just came and with it a letter

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Mr Beboii

 

Thank you for your letter dated 10th July requesting a refund of £xxxx.xx (they got the figure wrong from my letter £250 out!!) bank charges.

 

In the circumstances where you have authorised a payment that would, if met by us, lead to your account going overdrawn or to exceed an agreed overdraft limit we have to consider whether to make this payment. A fee is payable for this service provided by the bank, details of which are clearly laid out in our published tariff. The circumstances in which the fee will apply are set out in our account terms and conditions, a copy of which was provided to you when you opened your account. We are confident of our position and believe that if your claim for a refund proceeded to court, we would successfully resist any legal challenge in relation to these fees.

 

FD is, however, mindful of the management time and irrecoverable legal costs we may occur in relation to such a claim. For these commercial reasons alone, and without any admission of liability whatsoever, FD is prepared to make a payment to you in the sum (of a bit more than half)

This represents the charges applied to your account in full and final settlement of this matter, but does not include recall/unpaid item fees which I am not looking to refund.

 

If you accept our proposal please sign and return the enclosed declaration (wrong sort code on that) in the envelope provided and we will arrange a refund to you. This offer remains in place for ten working days.

 

I do hope I have clarified the bank's position, however, I am obliged to advise you of your right to refer your complaint to the financial Ombudsman service, as this constitutes the bank's final response.

 

etc etc.

 

 

 

Robert Kernaghan

Link to post
Share on other sites

So:-

 

Its interesting that its a fee for a service - if so one would think it would remain the same in every instance. Furthermore I seem to rember reading a post on here somewhere that says a fee for a service has to be proportionate. The 1982 act I think.

 

This also seems to suggest a human makes the decision rather than it being an automated process - no notes to that effect on my account.

 

I also like - we think we will win so have some money

 

Anyway I think my response will have to be something along these lines:-

 

Dear Mr Kernaghan.

 

Thank you for your prompt response to my letter and the kind offer that it contains. Unfortunately I will have to reject it.

 

As I have stated in my previous letters I believe that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

My arguement is that the bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

 

I have repeatedly asked the bank to justify their charges but to date you have declined to do so.

 

Therefore I would again request that you refund the correct ammount of £XXXX.XX as per my letter of 10th July plus £XX.XX in interest charged. If I do not recieve a satisfactory response from yourselves by my original deadline I will commence proceeding against you as previously stated.

 

Best wishes

 

 

Beboii

 

Any comments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like it's bang on. Fingers crossed for you.

 

You may also be able to answer my query...

 

Are you intending to claim for the interest charged when these fees took you still further overdrawn? If so, how did you calculate it? (I'm not referring to the 8% we get to add on if it goes to court)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a spreadsheet done by Vamp in the templates folder.

 

It is (apparently) very easy...

A&L: Settled - £6,200

HFC: Settled - £800

Shell Visa: Settled - £250

Egg: Settled - £700

Mint: Settled - £1200

RBS: Settled - £850

 

The opionions in this post are guaranteed to conform to the laws of physics, but pretty much nothing else...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

they acknowledged the claim on the 18th August, unfortunately I like a donut claimed the wrong ammount (included the interest in the particulars of claim but not the total ammount claimed) and have had to ammend the claim using an N244 filed online. Does anyone have any idea how long that application might take to be heard and what do people think will happen now that first direct have acknowledged?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

well after my mess up with filling in the papers (thank you fivelaws for your advice) they sent a partial offer which I rejected. Today I recieved an offer of the full ammount ---- now how good does that feel. Soon as the money comes in a donation is a coming. The site has been invaluable in both information and support and I could not have done it without your help.

 

For anyone thinking about it... should I ... shouldn't I .... course you should

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...