Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

default notice - next steps?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

I've been away from the forums for a while, but keeping up-to-date with the newsletters.

 

I have a credit card with Bank of Scotland. I've had it for several years, and I'm now in a situation where I owe around £2500, and they owe me around £1500 in bank charges (which I have almost won - just waiting for the extract decree) and another dispute which is being handled by the FOS.

 

Things have been extremely tight recently, and the wife and I have been living on supernoodles towards the end of the month! As a result, I've just not been paying the card for about 3 months.

 

I've written to them several times explaining the situation and suggesting that they freeze interest and charges on the account while the bank charges and the other issue are resolved, and then we can come to an arrangement to pay the outstanding balance. I also asked them to stop calling because I live abroad and they keep calling at midnight, 4am, etc.

 

So far they've ignored all the letters, and today I got a default notice through the mail. I know they have received the letters because the last person who called acknowledged receipt of the latest one.

 

What should I do?! I really don't want this to go to a debt collector, and I'm trying to negotiate with the bank, but they don't reply to my letters and for obvious reasons I don't want to talk to them on the phone.

 

Please help!!

edinburghbeerbucket :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ebb

 

In response to their default letter send them a CCA request letter N from link below (do it today) and inform them the account is now disputed.

 

Whilst the account is dispute they are not allowed to take any enforcement actions this includes placing a default on your credit record.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Include in the letter a a request for everything to be in writing and stop calling or accepting calls from them. Also include a request for their complaints procedure.

 

After all that just wait the 12 + 2 days and no agreement arrives they have defaulted & you can stop paying them. After + 31 days and no agreement then they have committed a criminal offense and you report them to their local Trading Standards.

 

If an agreement does arrive post it here an ask the guys if its enforceable

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/33174-consumer-credit-act-agreements-444.html

 

If they pass it off to a DCA then send them a CCA as well.

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the advice. I'll get onto the CCA request tonight.

 

I have a concern, though. In my last couple of letters to them, have I acknowledged the debt by offering to make make repayments? I don't have the letters to hand (I'm at work - tee hee!) but I remember something along the lines of "I am keen to repay the outstanding balance...".

 

Or, does sending this letter effectively make those previous statements null and void?

edinburghbeerbucket :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I understand - what are you trying to achieve here? Surely they are doing you a favour in defaulting/terminating the account, as it probably will go to DCA who is more likely to accept a reduced payment offer - thereby making your situation more bearable.

 

Denying the debt exists isn't really an option as you've being paying the account for some time.

 

While conar686's advice might work, I would advise against it unless you have a legitimate concern over the account such as no CCA agreement, etc. Using this to prevent the account being defaulted may backfire on you later, IMHO.

 

Disputing an account because you have concerns over it's enforceability is one thing, but disputing it as a means to prevent collection is another!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I understand - what are you trying to achieve here?

 

Ideally, I want them to stop applying interest and late fees to the account and freeze it.

 

I want it to stay like this until such time as my disputes with them have been settled.

 

Then, when we have agreed on the outstanding balance, I want to start paying it back at an affordable rate.

edinburghbeerbucket :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement you have with them (or terms in another document that is referred to in the agreement) will allow them to do this though - what you're asking them to do is at their discretion, so if they won't, they won't and you can't make them.

 

The only thing you can do is exactly what you have - tell them about your situation, the reasons it's come around (include the fact you think their charges are part of the problem!) and what you are able to offer comfortably.

 

They don't want to terminate the account, but they don't have to accept reduced payments.

 

If this doesn't work and - depending on your other circumstances - you can't get anywhere with them, you might want to consider involving the CCCS/Citizens Advice Bureau who can help you manage your debt or involve you in a Debt Management Program. (DMP) These shouldn't be entered in to lightly, but at least if the CCCS/CAB are involved they may be more inclined to accept. (I know Barclays can decide not to accept any version of Income/Expense without these being confirmed by such a third party)

 

Your disputes are a separate issue to the account collection, though - they aren't dependant one on another neither. You owe the money, they are entitled to default/terminate and sell the debt on - the fact you're querying it will prevent collection, but bear in mind you may not be entitled to those charges/fees back as you might not win, (unlikely, but anything is possible!) so don't rely on it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your honest advice, Car.

 

The frustrating thing is, if the bank gave me this breathing space they'd eventually get back the whole balance instead of selling it to a DCA for 30p in the pound or something!

 

As it stands, it's actually far more beneficial to me to let the account default and go to a DCA, negotiate a 40% settlement with them, then wait for my bank charges (etc) to come back to me and pay it off with that!

edinburghbeerbucket :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are defaulted (have a default registered on your credit file - they may "default" your account, but not record it!) you need to challenge this in your claim for charges.

 

If you can show - as you can - that the majority of the balance is made up of charges that are proven illegal, you can ask the Court to make an order under S.14 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to have the default removed, if BOS won't agree. (You may need advise from others on this, as you're probably governed by Scottish Law, though)

 

If they settle with you, make sure it's conditional on complete removal of the default not just marking it as satisfied/settled. (A satisfied default will still adversely effect your credit rating)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...