Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Problem with Toshiba LCD TV - advise needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5986 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

I bought a LCD Toshiba TV from Index in October 2005.

 

It is now not working. You can get sound from it but no picture.

 

We called Index and were told that the warranty that comes with it has expired, my husband called Toshiba and they were no help either.

 

My Stepdad has told us about an act that we should be covered under as you would expect a TV to last a little bit longer than 22 months.

 

Can anyone offer any advise please on how we can get this TV sorted?

 

Thank you

Halifax - Claimed £1400 settled @ £1102 :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't think Index shops still existed? Littlewoods, as far as I recall, sold them to Argos who then sold most of them? (Happy to be corrected).

 

Your stepdad is referring to the Sales of Goods Act 1979, SOGA for short, and yes, he is quite right, a TV should last more than 22 months.

 

This one has me stumped, as your contract is with the retailer, and the retailer in this instance is not there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Index no longer trade as a company, they closed all stores and sold property off to Argos in 2005. Kinda confuses me though because I swear the change over was implemented before october, as I currently work in an ex-index store which opened in september 05. (Just a note Argos have no liability if you did buy it from index)

 

Regarding the sales of goods act, a product should be made to a satisfactory quality, this includes durability of the item. If an item breaks due to an inherent fault within a reasonable amount of time (the length of time varies from item and reasonable would be the length of time a normal person would expect the product to last), you would be entitled to a repair or replacement of the item.

 

This is outlined under section 48 of the Sales of Goods act.

 

This should help:

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

(Just to clarify index brand wasn't sold to argos, but a proportion of the properties were. 33 to be exact. The stores mostly start with an 8 too :p)

 

(BTW I know index did have a helpline number, but I thought that would have closed down now, How did you contact index?)

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the circumstances then, best bet probably is to get one of those engineers with no callout fee, or to a shop that will diagnose FOC, and get a quote for repairs. The last time I had a problem like yours, it cost me £80 :-(, all it took was a spot of soldering and voila, good as new and TV has been working fine ever since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

last time i was in chester i was in argos and the stuff they were selling was index but to be truthfull i cant remember wether it was last year or the year before lol sorry that does not help....

bookworm oh most knoledgeable one can you help this one...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/112922-wrongly-accused-shoplifting.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

last time i was in chester i was in argos and the stuff they were selling was index but to be truthfull i cant remember wether it was last year or the year before lol sorry that does not help....

bookworm oh most knoledgeable one can you help this one...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/112922-wrongly-accused-shoplifting.html

 

I can't, no, police powers don't come under consumer law, and I have no idea of what they can and can't do.

 

Sorry for hijack, GG! I'll go have a look at your issue now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, ok, LXdirect, part of the Littlewoods group, very much existing company, ok dokie.

 

Right, so you want to send them a nice but firm letter. Were you actually just told that warranty had expired and nothing more, or did they say something on the lines of "nothing we can do" or "nothing to do with us", as it makes a difference? In one case, they are telling you a fact, leaving you to draw your own (erroneous) conclusions, in the other, they are misleading you. You will need to phrase your letter accordingly.

 

The rest of the letter should quote this, taken from Trading Standards website:

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) says that goods should be as follows:

  • Of satisfactory quality. This means the goods must meet the standards that any reasonable person would expect, taking into account the description, the price and all other relevant information. In some circumstances, the retailer may be liable for any statement made by the manufacturer about the goods.

Satisfactory quality includes the appearance and finish of the goods, their safety and durability and whether they are free from defects (including minor faults)

 

 

and point out that 22 months is hardly going to come under the "satisfactory" part of durability, and that.

 

Ask them how they plan to remedy the situation, and give them 14 days to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court is your recourse and, as a general rule, companies don't like going to court because it makes for bad publicity AND costs them money. I would not be shy about saying you are willing to go down this route is they will not resolve the matter.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

the only prob with lcd's over 18 months old is they wernt given a good shelf life in the first place, this is why plasma tv's took off so well.

when speaking to the company who sold it, always make them feel that its in good customer relations if they do what you need them to do.

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I was told as well Bookie.

 

An LCD screen is pure solid state - they have an estimated life of 60,000 hours and cannot get screen 'burn-in' ( ie you don't need a screen saver on an LCD monitor)

 

A plasma screen is slowly moving towards this lifespan - particularly the high end brands. Early plasma TVs have already gone to the graveyard. Plasma screens can get 'burn-in)

 

In the early days of flat screen, plasma was better at handing moving pictures (TV as opposed to computer screen) but LCD has now caught up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either is a sufficient remedy, it depends what's at fault.

 

If a £2 part has failed it is unreasonable to expect a replacement TV.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I work in the computer trade and seem to remember hearing something about EEC rules that all electrical appliances carry a 5 Year Warranty although I may be wrong. But if this is the case then the manufacturer is in breach of warranty.

Have you looked at Sale of good atc BRIGHTHOUSE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I work in the computer trade and seem to remember hearing something about EEC rules that all electrical appliances carry a 5 Year Warranty although I may be wrong. But if this is the case then the manufacturer is in breach of warranty.

Have you looked at Sale of good atc BRIGHTHOUSE

 

Hello.

 

Yes, you may find my thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/111368-sale-goods-act-brighthouse.html interesting. It is about a similar problem.

 

I don't know of, and am certainly not aware of, any EEC rules suggesting that all electrical appliances carry 5 year warranties - in fact I would doubt this very much...

 

What you CAN be sure of, though, is that most "high end" electrical/domestic appliances are expected to be free from manufacturer's faults for considerably longer than 12 months.

 

Any warranty (whether a 12 month manufacturer's warranty or private extended warranty) is IN ADDITION to your basic statuatory rights, which amongst other things, state your product should be "durable" to a degree expected by a "reasonable" person. Would a "reasonable" person expect to purchase an expensive TV every two years?

 

The most important thing to remember is that YOUR RIGHTS DO NOT COME TO AN END ONCE A MANUFACTURER'S 12 MONTH WARRANTY HAS EXPIRED.

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Right guys I need your help!

I wrote to them initially on 27th September and gave them 14 days.

Then we were in the middle of the postal strike so I gave them a bit longer.

Wrote to them again on 3rd November giving another 2 weeks.

 

No reply

 

What do I do now????

Halifax - Claimed £1400 settled @ £1102 :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your second letter did you put on it Letter Before Action?

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe 'Which' have evidence that the reasonable period for electrical goods is about 5 years.

 

Oops- posted this after reading page one of two- so its a bit late.

written entirely without prejudice to my whole rights and pleas in law and may not be founded upon in any proceedings.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...