Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Steve63 v Cap 1


steve1963
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5798 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok,

Some of you may be aware that I am butting heads with Cap1, well here is the full protracted saga to date.

I took out the card in approx 2000 and maintained it pretty well up until earlier this year when because of unemployment I missed 1 payment which in turn attracted some charges.

I wrote to C1 and explained that I was out of work however after looking at my finances I could afford to pay £20 a month, now for some reason two people from different depts at Cap 1 got involved. One was fairly helpful however the other was quite aggressive and didn't want to work with me towards getting something sorted.

I even said that things were looking better and hopfully by the end of August I might be able to go back to making my minimum monthly payment this wasn't good enough and they demanded I pay my arrears which I am not in a position to do.

In some of the letters the snotty one sent they have made reference to my agreement and that I knew the terms and condition when I took out the card so I decided to request a copy of my original consumer credit agreement, this is what they sent. A copy of the current agreement with my name and current (I lived elsewhere when I took the card out) address on it.

IMG_1180.jpg

At the same time they issued a delault notice on the account.

They are now starting the phone calls again, tonight I had 2 within 10 minutes of each other the first was a pretty aggresive english chap who got shirty with me because I wouldn't answer the security questions and told me I better change my attitude, I know I shouldn't have but I couldn't help laughing which I don't think helped matters. The second from a very stern young lady who I did actually talk to and told her that the account was now in dispute and we got into a little banter about what I should have recieved for my CCA request. She asked me if I had written to tell them that I wasn't happy with the info they sent out and as it happens the letter went today.

So this is where it's at, can anyone give me any insight into how this may pan out and how to approach the issue from here on in.

Cheers

Steve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write in to them reminding them that the account is in dispute. Say that you DO NOT give permission to be contacted by telephone and all communications must be in writing. You can add a bit about the OFT guidance as well, with the relevant bits highlighted. I did this with a DCA and it did the trick, no more phone calls!. I'll see if I can manage to pm it to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update,

Wrote back to cap1 telling them a copy of current terms and cond were not good enough and the account is now in dispute.

Today I recieved a copy of 'Form 4405 Application Certificate' with 2 signatues at the bottom . It's a single sided A4 sheet with just a small section at the bottom which has the heading 'Credit Card Account Agreement' and the sig boxes.

There is also a response from our Ellie (she's not just an office manager you know, she's an executive office manager) saying they have complied with my request and to supply the current terms and conditions is in compliance with section 78 (is it??) and that is her final response, so ya boo sucks!!

Should I write back thanking them but pointing out that this is an application form and the account is still in dispute or just ignore them and wait for the 30 days to be up.

Any help would be most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

OK I have not heard a peep out of Cap 1 for about a month.

They sent a 'application certificate' and then nothing.

I don't suppose for one minute they have forgotten about me but I see little point in prodding them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I have not heard a peep out of Cap 1 for about a month.

They sent a 'application certificate' and then nothing.

I don't suppose for one minute they have forgotten about me but I see little point in prodding them.

 

 

Steve

 

Can you post this up, with your personal details removed?.

 

This looks like an Unenforcable agreement from what you are saying.

Have a look at Mrsc 's thread in this forum.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sorry not been around much, got a lot going on at home with the little ones.

 

Update is:

 

Last week I got a letter from Fredricksons telling me to pay within 10 days or court action will be taken. I replied in writing telling them the account was in dispute and should not have been passed to them and suggested they pass it back at their earliest convenience.

 

Then there was a message on the answer phone last Friday asking me to call back before 9pm.

 

Anyone any advice on how to deal with this?

 

ukaviator

I will try and put up a pic but I still don't have a scanner so have to use my camera so it's not very clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't have all your stataments then you should send an SAR to CAp1 so you can wwork out the unlawful charges.

 

You should write to Fredricksons (copy to CAp1) headed "ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE" in big bold letters. Tell them that they, although they may have technically complied with your request under s78(1) of the consumer credit act 1974, they have not supplied you with a copy of an executable agreement and therefore have not provided you with a copy of any agreement that is enforceable in court. Further, you disagree with the amount of the alleged debt becasue of the inclusion of unlawful penalty charges.

 

Once you ghet your statements (or if you already have them) start a claim for the repayment of the unlawful charges (and default removel, if there is one).

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got another letter from Fredricksons today.

 

Dear Mr *******

We thank you for your recent communication

 

Your account has been placed on hold for 15 days to allow you to contact our client on freephone 0800 9524914 for the information you require.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

So what should I do now, Cap one have already sent their poor excuse for a CCA and I don't think they will come up with anything more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frdrckson's have anticipated the letter proposed in post #15. I would write to Cap1 (copy this letter from Fedrickson's) and remind them that they have not supplied a copy of an executed agreement to prove that they have the right to enforce the debt. You will assume that, as they haven't produeced a copy of an executed agreement that they cannot - ie one does not exist. If you don't hear from them within 7 days you will assume that that is the end of the matter.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK so nothing came back from Cap one but the phone calls have started from Fredricksons again.

I have printed out the cca request to send to Fredricksons and written out the cheque, is this the right thing to do?

Also are we 100% sure that the agreement is not enforceable, and can someone just outline why so that I can at least feel like I know what I am talking about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an application form, which is a pre-contractual document and therefore void under s59 of the CCA 1974. It does not contain the terms prescribed in schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 and is therefore unenforceable by virtue of ss 61, 65 and 127 of the CCA 1974. This last sentence would not be true if the agreement had been signed after April 2007 (but it was signed in 2000 so that's OK)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sorry for not updating this thread but there has not been much going on.

The account was with Fredricksons so I CCA'd them and it went quiet, then I started to get calls from NCO but I refused to talk to them so they wrote to me, so I CCA'd them and it went quite again until this morning.

The postie bought a letter from Cap1 (probably the first direct comms in 6 months) this is what is said.

 

TERMS OF YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD AGREEMENT

Thank you for your recent request. Please see overleaf for the current terms of your agreement with us.

For the rest of your terms and conditions, please see the leaflet enclosed.

If you have any further queries about the account please call our Customer Services Dept on the number below.

 

The enclosed leaflet mentioned has a tear off strip to sign if I want to cancel the agreement.

 

Bit confusing this, are they just trying to get me to make contact??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve63

 

The leaflet sent, are these your old terms and conditions from when you took out the card?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...