Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deed of Assignment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok story is, I have an old debt with the DWP for a crisis loan, this was taken out in 2002.

 

I totally forgot about it, and to be honest don't remember getting any correspondence about it (marriage breakup, being homeless and then getting a council house etc etc)

 

Anyway, beginning of July, a guy from Legal and Trade turned up on my doorstep with regard to this, I said that I wanted to deal with the DWP and he said no, I HAD to pay his company. So I told him that if he provided me with the proper paperwork to prove that his company had the right to collect, then I wanted to see it, and I wanted bank details so that I could set up a payment to them. He said ok, will sort it with the office and off he went.

 

I didn't hear another things from them.

 

Then on Friday I got a letter from CCS stating that iQor Services (formerly Legal and Trade) had referred the debt to them for collection.

 

So now I want to send to them, some sort of letter asking for proof that they have the legal right to collect this debt (I have a sneaky feeling that L&G couldn;t come up with the paperwork and that's why they have passed it on), and try as I might I just can't find a letter that does what I need, is there one on here somewhere, or could one of you lovely people knock me one up please?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

August unfortunately.

 

They do say on the letter that if they receive no response from me, they have no recourse but to ask their client for specific instructions regarding litigation. The Social Security Administration Act 1992 allows this action. Costs will be added etc etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA THEM

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

ENCLOSE £1.00 postal order, they have 12 working days to comply after which the alleged debt is in dispute and cannot be pursued or transferred to another agent. After an additional 30 days assuming they haven't complied, they would be committing a criminal offence.

Use letter N

Send by recorded delivery and don't use your signature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have to sign an agreement with respect to the crisis loan? Did it stipulate a start for repayments and repayment amounts? Have you made any repayments? They would normally be deducted from benefits on a weekly basis.

 

It's my understanding that this type you would have had to sign an agreement included in your 'letter of offer' which would have included the above info.

 

If the debt has been purchased by this company then they should have all of these details on file. Normally such a loan would have no interest applied.

 

I would still go down the route of cca request to the collectors and ask if they are acting on behalf of a creditor or claiming ownership of the alleged debt.

 

Other forum members who may be more accustomed to dealing with an issue regarding a crisis loan may give more detailed advice.

 

It's also worth looking at Job Centre Plus (crisis loans) on the web as it may jog your memory as to your application.

 

Best wishes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Social Fund debts aren't covered by the statute of limitations act and won't be statute barred after six years. Normally the DWP will arrange to take the repayments directly from any benefits you are receiving, using a fixed formula they deduct a few quid a week. They often do this without even bothering to inform you first,.... except in the case of some disability and child related benefits which may be exempted by law.

 

The first step would be to contact your local DWP office and tell them you have an outstanding Social Fund loan you wish to repay. It should be far easier to deal with them than a private debt collection company. If the debt has already been 'sold' to an outside agency, it may prove difficult but I have a feeling they will accept your offer of repayment as selling Social Fund debts to outside companies has legal implications to the Taxpayer who effectively financed your loan in the first place. To sell the rights to a private company who may then use the debt to profit from you, would IMO, be illegal, and a slippery slope toward privatisation of the Social Security system. (Watch out....it's heading that way)

 

Try DWP first...see what they've got to say for themselves.

 

PS It might be a bit pointless CCA'ing them. They will just produce your original form or a screenprint. Social Fund loans are not (I'm fairly certain) subject to the CCA'74 or any since.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...