Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help HSBC Court Date 6th Sept


Moschops22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have never been on this before so sorry if i'm a bit slow.

 

I have a court date on 6th Sept 07 to reclaim £3K in Bank Charges. I would really like some help putting a bundle together. I have read somewhere that I should not include any correspondence of either mine or HSBC that states 'Without Predudice', is that right?

 

Thanks:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Without prejudice means that it can't be used unless both parties agree to it being used.

 

Here is a link to help you with the bundle:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/97447-court-bundles-dummies.html

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi moschops, (great name, where did you get that from) You are right in thinking that anything with "without predudice" should not be used in the bundle.

I will post you a link for a step by step guide to the bundle. Have a read through it and just come back with any questions along the way.

 

Welcome to the forum!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I'll have a look at it tonight.

 

Moschops is my boyfriends name for me, its from a kids programme when he was younger about a dinosaur and his magic flower!!:D

 

Also I only have my most recent T+C's which doesn't call the charges 'penalties' etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am really stuck. I need to send off my bundle today. I have been looking at Nawandas Particulars of Claim which is different to the Statement of evidence that is recommended in Court Bundles for Dummies. I dont know which one to use.:confused:

 

The statement of evidence says alot of stuff about bank charges being called penalties, but I have no evidence that HSBC have done this, They have always called them charges. So do i delete this bit out of the statement? Please help me:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish you had asked earlier! I have to go out for the rest of the day now but I think Jowalshy will be around later to help.

The thing with the thread for dummies is to read it a few times in order to understand what you will be needing.

It is soe and ws are virtually the same thing. You just need to adapt it to suit your case.

If you have no help on this just keep bumping it up to the top for people to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted my bundles special delivery today only to find that when I got home I had a letter from DG saying they are going to apply for a stay.:evil:

 

What do I need to do next? Is it likely that that the hearing will go ahead if I challenge the stay?

 

I had an offer on 12th June for £2K and I wish I had taken it. Is there any chance I can go back to HSBC and accept the offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letters from DG mean nothing, wait to see what your Judge does and if he places a stay on your claim apply to have it lifted.

 

Keep an eye on what DG were asked to do in the judges directions have they complied ? if not try to get the defense struck out and judgement awarded to you :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry moss only just seen this. Any offers from hsbc will stipulate a time limmit in which you have to accept. After that time they will consider it as a refusal to the offer. Have a look at the offer letter and see what time limmit they imposed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...