Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lemma v the Glorious Amex


lemma1968
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5884 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been dealing with SRJ who had been instrucetd by Amex to collect a debt of about £700.

 

I CCA'd SRJ in July and this week we got a response saying:

 

" We thank you for your patience while we contacted our client.

Unfortunately we have been unable to locate a copy of the original agreement therefore, we confirm that we are no longer instructed in connection with this matter and have closed our file and returned the account to our client"

 

I'm am trying to chalk this up as a success but is it likely that Amex will flog this on to some other DCA?

 

The other thing is, we also SAR'd them. We have received a big envelope containing a number of statements going back to 2002 - not all i don't think - and a letter from a Data Protection Co-ordinator saying:

 

"I have been passed your letter by our correspindence department and understand you wish to exercise your right of Subject Access under s7 DPA.

 

I have enclosed copy statements for you and am able to provide those free of charge as a goodwill gesture.

 

Should you have queries regafding the charges on these statements please do not hesitate to contact us in writing and kindly attach the relevant statements.

 

However, should you require a full disclosure we require you to complete the enclosed form andreturn it to the address above with a fee of £10."

 

 

Ee did enclose a £10 cheque and they have retunred it to us.

 

The statements show about £140 in late payment charges and over limit fees from £15 - £20 each. There are also intermittent charges for Creditor Premium Insurance and Repayment Protection Plan - neither of which my other half can remember asking for, amd he is very ANTI PPI in any form.

 

What should be my next move?

 

Do we CCA amex directly now or let sleeping dogs lie?

 

If we go ahead with reclaiming what and how should we do? And the PPI?

 

Thanks folks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

What should be my next move?

 

Do we CCA amex directly now or let sleeping dogs lie?

 

If we go ahead with reclaiming what and how should we do? And the PPI?

 

Thanks folks

 

Hi Lemma,

 

Well the answer is what do you want to do...You have documentary eveidence that they do not have the agreement and have written the debt off. So leave it be...

 

If you want to pursue them for a refund of all payments and interest you will open a hornets nest that you may or may not win...

 

Have you not answered your own question in a round about sort of way?

 

Good luck whatever you decide,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would add to what Penfold has said the following:

 

They have sent you statements from 2002 because that is 6 years ago. They are assuming you are going to reclaim charges and are assuming that anything earlier is prevented by s5 of the Limitations Act 1980. This is not so - they should have sent everything and that is why you sent them £10. It's up to you as PF says, but I would write back and tell them you want "full dislosure" as they put it and pay the £10 again. There may be loads more charges before 2002.

 

Secondly, what has happened is that SRJ were collecting the debt on behalf of Amex. Quite properly, they went back to Amex for the agreement and stopped collecting in the meantime (At last, a DCA that abides by the rules :)). When none was forthcoming, again quite properly, they returned the file to Amex.

 

What will happen next? I wouldn't be at all surprised if the whole thing started again with a different DCA - either collecting on behalf of Amex as SRJ were, or having bought the debt outright (more fool them ;)). Either way, a CCA request directly to Amex would not go amis at this point.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...