Jump to content


Cases still being heard after OFT ruling *POST HERE*


claret74
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have read that some cases are still being heard in court despite the OFT ruling. As part of the application to lift the stay, it would be really useful to include details of courts where the Judge has decided to carry on with the case.

If you case is still being heard, or if you have managed to get your stay lifted, please post here so we can include the court details.

Thanks so much,

 

Claret74

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears that these courts are keeping business as usual and hearing cases.

Very useful to include in applications to lift a stay.

 

Aldershot & Farnham County Court,

Bow County Court,

Blackburn County Court,

Bristol County Court, NEW CLAIMS BEING STAYED ?

Caernarfon County Court,

Chester County Court,

Chichester County Court,

Croydon County Court,

Gateshead County Court,

Guildford County Court,

Hitchin County Court,

Hull County Court,

Kettering County Court,

Lancaster County Court,

Leeds Combined Court Centre,

Medway County Court,

Newcastle County Court,

Northampton County Court,

North Shields County Court,

Norwich County Court,

Nottingham County Court,

Oldham County Court,

Oxford Combined Court Centre,

Peterborough Combined Court Centre,

Salford County Court,

Scarborough County Court,

Scun.thorpe County Court,

Slough County Court,

Sunderland County Court,

Thanet County Court,

Watford County Court,

Wellingborough County Court,

West London County Court,

Winchester Combined Court,

Woolwich County Court,

Worcester County Court,

Wrexham Count Court,

 

Claret

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember the banks CAN REQUEST a stay of action but it is ultimately down to the individual judge/court to whether or not they will grant it.

 

if you are lucky to get a judge that is peed off with the whole abuse of the courts time, then you will prob be allowed to continue.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a court hearing against Barclays in the North Shields Courts on Thursday 16th August A.M.

 

I received a letter from Barclays on Saturday that my case had been stayed. However I rang my court this morning and they said no the judge is going ahead as Barclays had not submitted a specific application to a Stay in my case ( which would cost them £65 per case).

 

I'm nervous about going to Court - however I firmly believe in this ( not just about the money now) I have been trying to re-claim since Feburary!:rolleyes:

 

( I have successfully already claimed £745 from Barclays another account & Lloyds £3000 through letters and MCOL)

 

Any advice on Court preperation anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

my only advice is make sure you get your bundle is as soon as you can & then just get familiar with it

 

i have my court date tomorrow & have heard nothing from barclayts except a generalised letter to many about how they "intend" to stay all claims in court until test case goes through

 

I hope they simply forget to turn up!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

erm.... what exactly is 'my bundle' please? Is it the term for all my documents pertaining to this case?

 

Sorry

 

Yes it's the Court Bundle which contains all the relevant documents that will be viewed & considered by all parties in court (Bank, Judge, You)

 

I advised to get them in asap just because I never realised I had to do this & thought my initial particulars of claim and general blurb on Money Claim Online was OK which is silly in hindsight but I just didn't know you see..... :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks . i went to court today birkenhead county court ,i am claiming from the hsbc bank ,they sent me a letter on thursday to say that they are applying for a stay ,turned up at the court and the rep for hsbc was there he also represented other banks ,he chatted to me before hand to introduce himself & said that he is applying for a stay ,i said that i was opposing the stay .anyway went into court spoke to the judge ,he was saying that a decision would be made by january 08 by the high courts & he obviously did not know which way it would go .anyway the hearing lasted about 10 mins .it was stayed ,he also stayed all other cases ,so why we went in there i dont know ,as i got a feeling that he knew already what the outcome would be ,done all i can do now just a case of waiting to see i guess .sorry i cant be more positive but feel a bit gutted at the mo .ps if you havnt been to court before it is not scary just in a room with you ,the judge,rep for the bank,the rep askes for his stay then thr judge takes over with his speel & you argue your case . good luck everyone :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in court today at Morpeth (Judge Kramer) v citicards who tried to apply for stay on the basis that the underlying arguments are the same in credit card and overdraft charges. I managed to look at the CAG doc for appealing stays and read this out in court. The stay was refused with judge seeming particularly interested in Human Rights Act and the fact that Citi can still charge me.

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was in court today at Morpeth (Judge Kramer) v citicards who tried to apply for stay on the basis that the underlying arguments are the same in credit card and overdraft charges. I managed to look at the CAG doc for appealing stays and read this out in court. The stay was refused with judge seeming particularly interested in Human Rights Act and the fact that Citi can still charge me.

 

Wonderful to hear this.

Citi have run the Gauntlet for far too long......they have been given more stays than the Ritz Hotel

Just out of interest was the others that were favoured Citi or other banks ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK guys, I really need help on this one.

 

as you may well can see from this thread Brighton County Court has slapped a general stay on all bank charges cases pending the outcome of the OFT test case.

I applied for a lift to the circuit judge,and lo and behold,a hearing will be held soon(a clerk at the courthouse told me from looking into her comp.system)

 

So,what do i do???? Anybody been to such a hearing yet?What do i have to do?How do i present my case?How do i argue?pls. pls. help as this is my BIG chance to sway the judge and have my case heard and not wait 2 years...

 

PLEASE HELP!!!!!:-) :-) :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like my First Direct current account claim is continuing at Morpeth.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/98802-first-direct-should-i.html#post1091678

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...