Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

American Express


chris5219
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I don't know if anyone has had a similar problem to me. Some years ago I had an American Express card the payments were up to date but sometimes I was late paying. I had a phone call from American Express saying if I didn't pay it asap it will get passed to a debt collector. I paid but it still got passed to Newman's DCA. I was charged £235.00 for this "privledge" Newman's started to hassle me for payment I queried the £235.00 charge and was told in was in the terms and conditions I told them I had never seen this. I had started to feel ill by this time as we had other debt problems and the with the stress of anything I just put this on the "back burner" for the time being. Newman's phoned me almost every night I offered them £50.00 per month they wanted £70.00 although I couldn't really afford this I paid them £70.00 under duress. During an argument with them I told them I was going to a debt management service this was said in anger i was fed up with the phone calls. They took me at my word and passed the account back to American Express I started paying American Express £70.00 per month. Then out of the blue a letter arrived from AIC DCA. They also charged me £275.00 they started to hassle me at work and home and in letters. By this time I was angry I'd been charged all this money I had never stopped paying anyone but I still got all this hassle. I contacted Payplan who sorted it all out for me and AIC went quiet for a couple of years. In December 2005 I got made redundant from work and then had some sort of breakdown I now have agoraphobia and cant work. Payplan pay token payments to our creditors now because although my husband works we have a huge mortgage. Our creditors accepted this until along came CapQuest they took over Amex account. Although they never charged me I was bullied into paying £50.00 per month which I did until this month when I just couldn't afford it so I cancelled the DD and wrote to Capquest and explained why. I then had a call from one of them at Capquest saying if I don't pay they will take me to court and add all the interest on I said do that then. I then got a letter from H.L. Legal saying they want full payment by 10th August. I decided to write to Capquest enclosing £10.00 asking for an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). Meanwhile I get another letter from H.L. Legal adding on solicitors and court fees plus £58.72 I dont know what this is, but they told me they would be adding interest on a daily basis until its paid. This was dated 6th August bearing in mind I was supposed to have had until 10th August to pay. Capquest then acknowledged the letter and asked me to pay token payments until they get the information I want. I feel I have not been fairly treated by American Express the card was paid up to date and over £500.00 of charges wasn't right. I've asked Amex several times for statements and terms and conditions but never got an answer. Plus I dont think all my payments have been applied because the amount never seems to go down Capquest have never acknowledged Payplan who have been paying them all along and AIC before them.

Sorry about the long story but American Express are horrible to deal with, none of my other creditors are like this.

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You probably need to send an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to AmEx as well as they will have made unlawful late payment charges which you can claim back, and, while you're at it, ask them for a copy of an exectuted agreement under s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as amended) (that will cost an extra £1). In your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), specifically ask for a copy of the deed of assignment for the account when it was passed to Capquest. This should rattle a few cages at least.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not suggesting you ask for T&Cs (altoug they might be useful) but for a "copy of an executed agreement" - you are entitled to this under s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. What it means is a opy of the agreement (not the application from) with your signature on and a signature of someone acting for Amex, properly dated. ifthey can't provide that then they are in big problems under s78(6) of the Act.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven,

 

I'm going to write and ask for exactly what you've said the signed copy. When it got passed to Newman's I asked what this charge was and was just told its in the terms and conditions but if its Newman's terms and conditions maybe I should ask them for this signed agreement too? Although I never signed anything from Newman's.

 

Its good that we can do this now, these banks and credit card company's have had it all their way for much too long.

 

I'll keep you posted.

 

Many thanks

 

Chrissie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Newmans won't have their own T&Cs - they had your agreement assigned to them and the T&Cs can only be chenged wit hyour agreement. Youcould write to them for a copy of the executed agreement too - it keeps them all on their toes.

 

You may find that this starts getting passed backwards and forewards between Amex and Newmans - don't let this confuse you but keep at both until Newmans pass it back to amex which they probably will do (especially if neiher can provide a copy of the executed agreement within the 12 days so that the account goes into default. DCAs don't want that sort of hassle - they are into easy money only.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same thing, I asked them for a signed copy of the credit agreement and all they have sent me is a signed copy (by me) of my application form and that is all! There does not appear to be and I definitely don't have a copy of any agreement be it CC or PPI agreement with Amex at all.

 

They are outside the 12 + 30 days so what exactly can I get back from Amex?

 

:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not so much what you can get back as the fact that the agreement is unenforcable - they cannot

 

1) seek payment

2) add charges or interest

3) communicate info about it to a 3rd party

4) add any mark to your credit history with a CRA

 

If it is over the 12+30 days then they have committed an offence and you can report tham to the OFT for them to take action under ss167 and 169 of the CCA 1974.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steven, I still want my PPI and penalty charges back though and I am pursuing these at the moment. I read somewhere that you should be able to claim more back i.e. interest charges if the agreement in unenforceable, is this not the case?

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven 4064,

 

Thanks for that, I'll write to Newmans. I'll dig out Newmans address I must have it here somewhere or maybe their address is on the web?

 

Great site isn't it? I've got another thread in the mortgages section I'm going to do the same with our old mortgage company Gmac.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Chrissie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...