Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

American Express


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I don't know if anyone has had a similar problem to me. Some years ago I had an American Express card the payments were up to date but sometimes I was late paying. I had a phone call from American Express saying if I didn't pay it asap it will get passed to a debt collector. I paid but it still got passed to Newman's DCA. I was charged £235.00 for this "privledge" Newman's started to hassle me for payment I queried the £235.00 charge and was told in was in the terms and conditions I told them I had never seen this. I had started to feel ill by this time as we had other debt problems and the with the stress of anything I just put this on the "back burner" for the time being. Newman's phoned me almost every night I offered them £50.00 per month they wanted £70.00 although I couldn't really afford this I paid them £70.00 under duress. During an argument with them I told them I was going to a debt management service this was said in anger i was fed up with the phone calls. They took me at my word and passed the account back to American Express I started paying American Express £70.00 per month. Then out of the blue a letter arrived from AIC DCA. They also charged me £275.00 they started to hassle me at work and home and in letters. By this time I was angry I'd been charged all this money I had never stopped paying anyone but I still got all this hassle. I contacted Payplan who sorted it all out for me and AIC went quiet for a couple of years. In December 2005 I got made redundant from work and then had some sort of breakdown I now have agoraphobia and cant work. Payplan pay token payments to our creditors now because although my husband works we have a huge mortgage. Our creditors accepted this until along came CapQuest they took over Amex account. Although they never charged me I was bullied into paying £50.00 per month which I did until this month when I just couldn't afford it so I cancelled the DD and wrote to Capquest and explained why. I then had a call from one of them at Capquest saying if I don't pay they will take me to court and add all the interest on I said do that then. I then got a letter from H.L. Legal saying they want full payment by 10th August. I decided to write to Capquest enclosing £10.00 asking for an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). Meanwhile I get another letter from H.L. Legal adding on solicitors and court fees plus £58.72 I dont know what this is, but they told me they would be adding interest on a daily basis until its paid. This was dated 6th August bearing in mind I was supposed to have had until 10th August to pay. Capquest then acknowledged the letter and asked me to pay token payments until they get the information I want. I feel I have not been fairly treated by American Express the card was paid up to date and over £500.00 of charges wasn't right. I've asked Amex several times for statements and terms and conditions but never got an answer. Plus I dont think all my payments have been applied because the amount never seems to go down Capquest have never acknowledged Payplan who have been paying them all along and AIC before them.

Sorry about the long story but American Express are horrible to deal with, none of my other creditors are like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had horrendous problems with Newman and Amex - they are the pits. Newman charged me best part of £1000 after my card defaulted but I managed to get it fully refunded after I asked them to justify how the charge was made up - ie in the same way as penalty charges it should reflect their actual costs only.

 

I also made a formal complaint after they threatened to make me bankrupt in an english court - they cant as I live in Scotland and unreasonable threats like this are outwith the FSA guidelines for debt collection. You should fight them and take back the initiative with the support of CAG.

  • Haha 1

All comments are my personal views - if in doubt then seek professional advice. If you think i've helped then please tip my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...