Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, and sorry for not asking earlier but have you submitted your DQ yet?
    • As suggested by JK2054 I'll email Evri to their small claims email address, attaching the label and collection receipt and quoting the Money Claims ref number. Is there anything else in addition to sending the email I should do at this stage? Rgds, J
    • Hi, I'd change justice centre to county court. I also wouldn't be including a telegraph article in the bundle. It doens't prove anything law and you don't have distribution rights on it. I also wouldn't personally break down the exhibits on the index page, normally people have a seperate page for this right before the exhibits. The main index page normally just says Exhibits to WX of [Your Name] or at least that's the format I use/see people here use, although really it makes minimal difference.   I also see that despite referencing several judgements you haven't included the EVRi one   paragraph 46 really needs to go imo it has nothing to do with anything. Your in court to apply the law to your case, not to tell the judge about a newspaper that means nothing to your claim.   I also see you've adopted the issues in dispute/not in dispute, which is also known as a scott schedule. if you are taking this approach, for things not in dispute I would say this needs to be things that are agreed between parties, not things like "There is no dispute that I am happy to supply all this evidence which is included in the court bundle." I would say that issues in dispute is to focus on the aspects of the claim that are in dispute, such as whether liability is limited by insurance or not, so I'd be changing that accordingly.   BF should be along shortly to advise on things.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • J, I just numbered them like that; once the witness statement is made, I'll add it to the pages.   The court date has been set as 02 July 2024. Please find attached V6. I will send an unredacted to the email.  claim budle_V6.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CABOT bullying my wife


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have recently been contacted by CABOT over an old credit card bill, the first contact was about a month ago. Cabot sent a postcard to my address headed "to the occupier", asking for anyone who knew me to contact a number provided.

 

Unfortunately, i have misplaced this card but i am sure i have it somewhere?

 

On the second occasion i received a phone call and despite their attempts at bullying me i told them i did not know or acknowledge any debt to their company. I requested that they send me a statement of my account including all payments and charges as they are requesting over three times the amount of my credit limit.

 

I was in the process of putting this request in writing, when i received several letters demanding payment for something i was generally unaware of, six over a seven day period.

 

Today, my wife received a phone call stating i gave her permission to talk about my account only two weeks ago, as far as i was concerned i gave the original card provider for my wife to discuss my account as a result of myself working in a telephone blackspot shortly after i applied for the card around 2000/2001.

 

My wife was told that unless i made a payment within 48hrs it would go to another department and i will have people visiting my house to take away my goods.

 

incidently, i received a letter dated 27-07-2007 and received 05-08-2007 offering me a discount of 30% or the option to repay over five years if i respond in the next 30 days

 

i had a credit limit of £200 and repaid all monies and interest and believe the figure requested is made up from late payment fees and charges.

 

i will pay if i owe but i will not pay the sharks who will try to push for more than their due.

 

any advice, much needed

 

mickyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to find that letter addressed "to the Occupier". Depending on the content, it could be tangible evidence of a breach of the DPA.

 

This doesn't sound like the way Cabot operate. Have they set a DCA on you, such as Ruthbridge?

 

Keep ALL paperwork that arrives, and keep a diary of all calls. This lot have no power to take the action you describe, so don't worry.

 

Get that CCA off to them, making sure that you write I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT WHATSOEVER. Although they will write back and tell you the CCA does not apply to them, and will send your £1 back, it is important to ignore their bullsh!t as there is strong evidence that in at least some cases, rights AND duties of the oriinal lender were transferred on assignment of the account.

 

Also put in the letter that ALL contact will be in writing only.

 

I would also SAR the original creditor. Find out how this has ballooned so drastically, and claim back what you can. If Cabot have added any little "extras", tell them to feck off.

 

Keep posting and keep us up to date. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mickyn

 

This sounds like our little friends at ruthbridge and not cabot as seahorse has said, try and find the card you received if the cards is from EXPRESS delivery or SWIFT delivery then it's redbridge who are acting for cabot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...