Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court case , please help


bethcharlie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Recently i was given judgemment by default against the HSBC in my court case . They did not put their questionaire in on time and were struck out .

They have now applied for this judgement to be set asideand applying for an order of stay until after the case with the OFT is decided .

I was sent a letter from my local County Court saying there will be a hearing for this on Sept 14 2007 .

Can anyone please give me advice on what i should do .

do i have to say anything in court or can i appeal against this ,

 

Someone please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recently i was awarded judgement by default against the HSBC Bank . They did not put their questionaire in on time and were struck out .

They have now applied to the court for this judgement to be set aside and for an order of stay .

I got a letter from my local county court stating that a hearing for this will be on 14 september .

Could anyone please give me any advice on what to do now or what to say in court about this or can i appeal against this .

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,just my opinion but i recon the judge might just tell them or if not you INSIST that ,,A judgment was made and they had the oppertunity to defend themselves previously and chose not to so why just as certain matters ie oft case has came to light should the judgement be overturned and further wasting the time of the court,,like i said just my opinion but get as many opinions as you can, but dont worry you will get there in the end!! jezzy

R.B.S Mastercard £7,189.00 written off default removed

NatWest Goldcard

Natwest business account

Natwest joint personal

B&Q Trade account

Debenhams store card

leeds mortgage

Nationwide

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

IF YOU HAVE FOUND MY ADVICE HELPFULL PLEASE CLICK ON MY SCALES, ALL ADVICE IS GIVEN IN GOOD FAITH AND IS MY OPINION ONLY

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there,just my opinion but i recon the judge might just tell them or if not you INSIST that ,,A judgment was made and they had the oppertunity to defend themselves previously and chose not to so why just as certain matters ie oft case has came to light should the judgement be overturned and further wasting the time of the court,,like i said just my opinion but get as many opinions as you can, but dont worry you will get there in the end!! jezzy

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok , well courts dont usually like to award judgement by default as its not resolution to the actual arguement (hope that makes sense) I asked for the date to assertain if the bank had waited an unreasonable time before asking for the set aside. What you need to do now is provide the court with the letter from link above regarding the stay, also include a list of all the claims that the bank has settled both prior and after the OFT case. This can be found in the litigation forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , i am posting this thread again in the hope for more help .

 

I recently won my court case against HSBC bank . I was given judgement by default on 25th July 2007 , the bank did not return their questionaire on time and were struck out .

I then returned the claims form to the court on the 26th July stating that i wanted the money paying to me immediately and then on the 30th July received a copy from the courts stating that the bank must pay the claimant forthwith .

I received nothing from the bank and they applied for the judgement to be set aside and for an order of stay on the case .

I then received a letter from the courts dated 7th August that the defendents hearing for appliction for a Set Aside The Judgement will be heard on September 14th .

Could anyone please give me some good advice on what i should do now , any info would be gratefully appreciated .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically you are going to have to convince the court that HSBC's actions are unreasonable. Most courts would rather see a case resolved than award judgement by default. As I stated in my post above you need to provide the court with a list of all the claims that they have settled so far. I would also read through the success threads to see if they have applied for set asides and then subsequently settled the case.

Can you post what the order says please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi livelylad ,

 

Thanks for your reply . The order says ;

 

To the defendant ;

You have not replied to the claim form . It is therefore ordered that you must pay the claimant £4407.08 for debt and interest and £120 for costs .

You must pay the claimant forthwith .

 

Also i received a letter from the banks solicitors saying that they had applied for it to be set aside because of an administration error over the dates to reply . In other words they forgot to get it in on time .

On the courts own website it cleary states that you can only appeal against a judgement by default if you have a very good reason . ie ;

You did not receive the papers ;

You were out of the country etc ; Not that it was an administrative error . Do you think this might go in my favour .

Also should i write a letter to the court before the case opposing it .

The judgement was also made before the OFT test case was made public and there solicitors are now using this as a reason for it to be set aside .

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...