Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Diskmandave-vs-Wescot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5433 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Letter going back by return!!

Attached: Copy letter 13/08/2007

Dear Sirs,

This letter is a complaint and should be dealt with under your formal complaints procedure.

I refer to your recent letter dated 11/12/2007 which was received on 14/12/2007 which is referenced as “S27/”.

I wrote to you on 13/08/2007, a copy of this letter is attached for your reference, requesting;

  • A copy of original credit agreement.
  • Total amount outstanding when you acquired the account.
  • A listing of all monies paid to date.
  • A listing of all credits and debits to the account to date.
  • The current balance of the account.
  • A copy of the original default notice.
  • You should also be aware that the original terms and conditions relating to the account should have been sent also and as a matter of course when responding to a Section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 request for documentation.

All that you have provided is a copy of an original application form for a credit card and a balance of account. This in no way satisfies my request and therefore this account is now in dispute and I no longer acknowledge any debt to you.

Having taken legal advice I am aware that the copy of the original application form that you have sent me does not contain any of the prescribed terms set out by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and is completely unenforceable and has been so since the date that you purchased this account from MBNA, and therefore, as ignorance of the law is seen as no excuse, you have been collecting upon an unenforceable credit agreement since 1998 and thus collecting payments by deception which is a serious criminal offence that could bring into question your fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

I am very sure that you are aware of Section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

And that Section 189 of the Act states;

“Creditor “ means the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement or

the person to whom his rights and duties under the agreement have passed by

assignment or operation of law, and in relation to a prospective consumer credit

agreement, includes the prospective creditor;

My aims to resolve this dispute;

  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, and in writing, disclaim any and all future interest in this matter.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, refund all monies paid toward this unenforceable account and with compound interest of 8% from the date that the first payment was made under duress and threat of legal action.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, admit that they should have been in receipt of an enforceable credit agreement from MBNA Bank when they purchased this account.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, admit that they wrongfully purchased an unenforceable account without having sight of an enforceable regulated credit agreement having taken 3 months to provide a copy of an application form provided by MBNA Bank.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, provide to me, the alleged debtor, a copy of the Deed of Assignment that should exist in relation to the sale of this alleged debt.

In closing, I might add that should you consider legal action in this matter, I am more than capable of defending such a claim and more so to making a counterclaim for the reasons set out above. Should a successful Counterclaim Judgment be entered you would be subject to additional costs.

I look forward to your co-operation and due diligence in this matter.

Yours faithfully,

X xxxx xxx xXXv xvx XVX x x x v

DMD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am amazed that MBNA managed to find anything. They must have had pneumatic drills in their cellars to dig that one up.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW what a great Credit agreement Dave, its full of no prescribed terms:)

 

i wonder if theyve been taking a leaf out of Barclaycards books with regards to how to Balls up a credit agreement

This is my biggest creditor!! :D £4500 at the outset!!! :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice response Dave see you havent lost your touch since your pink status

you wouldnt be the same!!!!!:) You really been paying these muppets for nine years on an unenforcable?

 

 

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice response Dave see you havent lost your touch since your pink status

you wouldnt be the same!!!!!:) You really been paying these muppets for nine years on an unenforcable?

 

 

Regards

Andy

Andy, as you seem to be an authority, and you've obviously been following me... Can you suggest anything better..... ?

 

Best wishes, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Response... In the envelope... :D

 

Attached: Copy letter 13/08/2007

Dear Sirs,

 

This letter is a complaint and should be dealt with under your formal complaints procedure.

 

I refer to your recent letter dated 11/12/2007 which was received on 14/12/2007 which is referenced as “S27/”.

 

I wrote to you on 13/08/2007, a copy of this letter is attached for your reference, requesting;

  • A copy of original credit agreement.
  • Total amount outstanding when you acquired the account.
  • A listing of all monies paid to date.
  • A listing of all credits and debits to the account to date.
  • The current balance of the account.
  • A copy of the original default notice.
  • You should also be aware that the original terms and conditions relating to the account should have been sent also and as a matter of course when responding to a Section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 request for documentation.

All that you have provided is a copy of an original application form for a credit card and a balance of account. This in no way satisfies my request and therefore this account is now in dispute and I no longer acknowledge any debt to you.

 

Having taken legal advice I am aware that the copy of the original application form that you have sent me does not contain any of the prescribed terms set out by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and is completely unenforceable and has been so since the date that you purchased this account from MBNA, and therefore, as ignorance of the law is seen as no excuse, you have been collecting upon an unenforceable credit agreement since 1998 and thus collecting payments by deception which is a serious criminal offence that could bring into question your fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

 

 

 

I am very sure that you are aware of Section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

 

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

And that Section 189 of the Act states;

 

“Creditor “ means the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement or

the person to whom his rights and duties under the agreement have passed by

assignment or operation of law, and in relation to a prospective consumer credit

agreement, includes the prospective creditor;

 

My aims to resolve this dispute;

  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, and in writing, disclaim any and all future interest in this matter.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, refund all monies paid toward this unenforceable account and with compound interest of 8% from the date that the first payment was made under duress and threat of legal action.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, admit that they should have been in receipt of an enforceable credit agreement from MBNA Bank when they purchased this account.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, admit that they wrongfully purchased an unenforceable account without having sight of an enforceable regulated credit agreement having taken 3 months to provide a copy of an application form provided by MBNA Bank.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, provide to me, the alleged debtor, a copy of the Deed of Assignment that should exist in relation to the sale of this alleged debt.

In closing, I might add that should you consider legal action in this matter, I am more than capable of defending such a claim and more so to making a counterclaim for the reasons set out above. Should a successful Counterclaim Judgment be entered you would be subject to additional costs.

 

I look forward to your co-operation and due diligence in this matter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

X xxxx xxx xXXv xvx XVX x x x v

 

 

DMD.

 

Going 1st class Signed For in the morning...! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do not hate me for this. Realised you have enveloped it while I was typing!

 

Dear Sirs,

 

This letter is a complaint and should be dealt with under your formal complaints procedure. Love this - saves on a lot of wasted postage

 

I refer to your recent letter dated 11/12/2007 which was received on 14/12/2007 which is referenced as “S27/”.

 

I wrote to you on 13/08/2007, a copy of this letter is attached for your reference, requesting;

  • A copy of original credit agreement.
  • Total amount outstanding when you acquired the account.
  • A listing of all monies paid to date.
  • A listing of all credits and debits to the account to date.
  • The current balance of the account.
  • A copy of the original default notice.
  • You should also be aware that the original terms and conditions relating to the account should have been sent also and as a matter of course when responding to a Section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 request for documentation.

All that you have provided is a copy of an original application form for a credit card and a balance of account. This in no way satisfies my request and therefore this account is now in dispute and I no longer acknowledge any alleged debt to you. (take out “to you” – as the debt is not acknowledged to anyone now)

Having taken legal advice I am aware that the copy of the original application form that you have sent me does not contain; any of the prescribed terms set out by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, is completely unenforceable and has been so since the date that you claim to have purchased this account from MBNA, and therefore, as (delete , and therefore, as) I feel obliged to inform you that; ignorance of the law is seen as no excuse, you have been collecting upon (delete collecting upon) pressurising payments from me for an unenforceable credit agreement since 1998 and thus (delete and thus) .You will no doubt realise that you have been* collecting payments by deception which is a serious criminal offence that could bring into question your fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

 

* reason for this change is to avoid them coming back saying that they did not know it was uncollectible due to not “purchasing” the actual agreement.

(I am very sure that you are aware of Section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

 

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

And that Section 189 of the Act states;

 

“Creditor “ means the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement or

the person to whom his rights and duties under the agreement have passed by

assignment or operation of law, and in relation to a prospective consumer credit

agreement, includes the prospective creditor;) Not sure assignments are absolute so personally I would avoid giving them a get out response. Also from Moonhawks thread, Aktiv seem to claim they are not agents either.

 

My aims to resolve this dispute;

  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, and in writing, disclaim any and all future interest in this matter.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, refund all monies paid toward this unenforceable account and with compound interest of 8% from the date that the first payment was made under duress and threat of legal action.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, admit that they should have been in receipt of an enforceable credit agreement from MBNA Bank when they purchased this account.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, admit that they wrongfully purchased an unenforceable account without having sight of an enforceable regulated credit agreement having taken 3 months to provide a copy of an application form provided by MBNA Bank.
  • Wescot Credit Services, without further delay, provide to me, the alleged debtor, a copy of the Deed of Assignment that should exist in relation to the sale of this alleged debt.

In closing, I might add that should you consider legal action in this matter, I am more than capable of defending such a claim and more so to (delete and more so) , including making a counterclaim for the reasons set out above. Should a successful Counterclaim Judgment be entered, you would be subject to additional costs.

 

I look forward to your co-operation and due diligence in this matter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

X xxxx xxx xXXv xvx XVX x x x v

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a similar scenario with one of mine, Dave....

 

It's worth going for a refund, but it'll be an uphill battle with no guarantees. Mine's been going on since the CCA default in January, but they are now in a very tight corner with the FOS because they have to issue a final, written response to my complaint... which they really, really don't want to do. The complaint only relates to stuff after April, 2007 by the way.... but there's enough there to get them hung nicely anyway. ;)

 

Excellent letter Dave :D .... let's see what tosh they come back with now. Bet there'll be no court claim from them now though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
It's taken them 6 weeks to shuffle that around their office bearing in mind my letter was signed for on the 19th of December!! :rolleyes:

 

Dave, you are slipping. I thought you would have a letter ready to remind them of their complaints procedure, it was signed for on 19 Dec (not 24 Jan) so their clock has nearly ticked out to the FOS already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...