Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Post, Andie, am waiting on an e-mail on the exact status of an authorised agent, what this entails and the responsibilities involved for the agent and the insurer...will advis asap.

 

Welcome put in black and white on their FSA reglulation advice sheet:

What will you pay us for our services - There is no fee payable.

 

This sheet is given for you to decide if their services are right for you. This gives no indication that they have a financial interest in selling you that policy, in fact it implies the opposite...no fee payable.

 

NU have decided the will happilly accept the dirty mone from this but cold not care less what is happening on their authorised behalf.

 

And the ENITRE thing is run from a non-existent Dept 33, that doesn't actually keep records of anything or anyone (how do they pass an FSA audit or account to HMRC then??)

 

We need Dr Who :p

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just seen this pop up

 

BRIEF-Cattles makes subordination document available

BRIEF-Cattles makes subordination document available - Forbes.com

 

Looks light on details but there are contact numbers and hints of new info. Anyone fancy picking up a phone? :)

 

Oh and for those interested, don't forget you can make yourself some nice alerts

Google Alerts

 

 

Well if they have £500 million to pay back in july its time to batten down the hatches as we will probrably face a barage of phone calls and letters in attempt to get money in... i mean they rang me last night asking for this months payment...half way through the month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Post, Andie, am waiting on an e-mail on the exact status of an authorised agent, what this entails and the responsibilities involved for the agent and the insurer...will advis asap.

 

Welcome put in black and white on their FSA reglulation advice sheet:

What will you pay us for our services - There is no fee payable.

 

This sheet is given for you to decide if their services are right for you. This gives no indication that they have a financial interest in selling you that policy, in fact it implies the opposite...no fee payable.

 

NU have decided the will happilly accept the dirty mone from this but cold not care less what is happening on their authorised behalf.

 

And the ENITRE thing is run from a non-existent Dept 33, that doesn't actually keep records of anything or anyone (how do they pass an FSA audit or account to HMRC then??)

 

We need Dr Who :p

 

 

That sheet thay have given you is an "initial disclosure document" and they have to give you that by law. Its to advise you that they are regulated by the FSA and that they offer certain products and use limited insurers. It will also state that you will recieve no advice from them but they may ask some questions to narrow down the selection of products offered. What they are stateing is that there is no fee for this advice..... what they havent been doing is following it up with the needs and demands statement to determin suitability for any insurance and that is a big no no as it proves that they have durable medium that records if you asked for insurance or not... so potentially any insurance has been mis-sold. On my car finance agreement (not with welcome) i have finance gap which is shown on my needs and demands and on the accompanying letter it tells me that 0.66p is premium tax, of wich they are obliged to disclose to me so NU and DG must get this not disclosing thing from "WE THINK WERE ABOVE THE LAW" book...WRITTEN BY WELCOME FINANCE

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sheet thay have given you is an "initial disclosure document" and they have to give you that by law. Its to advise you that they are regulated by the FSA and that they offer certain products and use limited insurers. It will also state that you will recieve no advice from them but they may ask some questions to narrow down the selection of products offered. What they are stateing is that there is no fee for this advice..... what they havent been doing is following it up with the needs and demands statement to determin suitability for any insurance and that is a big no no as it proves that they have durable medium that records if you asked for insurance or not... so potentially any insurance has been mis-sold. On my car finance agreement (not with welcome) i have finance gap which is shown on my needs and demands and on the accompanying letter it tells me that 0.66p is premium tax, of wich they are obliged to disclose to me so NU and DG must get this not disclosing thing from "WE THINK WERE ABOVE THE LAW" book...WRITTEN BY WELCOME FINANCE

 

LMAO, th book that shall become an obituary :D Thats it..initial disclosure document, I think yo have told me that twice now and I keep forgetting!

 

On the one we have (that was posted I may add) it states:

 

We will advis and make a recommendation for you after we have assessed your needs.

 

Apparently our need was to part with as much money as possible.

 

Anyone dealing with SAR's for NU, read this...it has a dedicated address and Tel number...may be orth trying!

 

Norwich Union Ebroking: e-services: Register Form: Terms

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will get one to you Andie, may be 2moro though, I have to go and use my mums scanner, still can't find the plug for min!

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

LMAO, th book that shall become an obituary :D Thats it..initial disclosure document, I think yo have told me that twice now and I keep forgetting!

 

On the one we have (that was posted I may add) it states:

 

We will advis and make a recommendation for you after we have assessed your needs.

 

Apparently our need was to part with as much money as possible.

 

Anyone dealing with SAR's for NU, read this...it has a dedicated address and Tel number...may be orth trying!

 

Norwich Union Ebroking: e-services: Register Form: Terms

 

 

It shouldnt really state that... what it should say is that

you will not recieve advice from us.

We may ask questions to narrow down the selection of products that we will provide details on....

now here is the funny bit...

You will then need to make your own choice on how to proceed...... if only.

 

i think that initial disclosure and needs and demands is going to play a big part in reclaiming money back or rendering agreements unenforcable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will get one to you Andie, may be 2moro though, I have to go and use my mums scanner, still can't find the plug for min!

 

 

Andie..if they dont give you that sheet....then straight away they are in breach of the FSA`s regulations as ist contains all the Key Facts.......... Where i work, we have to give that to the customer before we discuss any info on insurance or finance and thats the fsa basic requirement

Link to post
Share on other sites

It shouldnt really state that... what it should say is that

you will not recieve advice from us.

We may ask questions to narrow down the selection of products that we will provide details on....

now here is the funny bit...

You will then need to make your own choice on how to proceed...... if only.

 

i think that initial disclosure and needs and demands is going to play a big part in reclaiming money back or rendering agreements unenforcable.

 

Aha, you are right, it is this that will snooker them. I as reading up on this and there are 2 types of sales, Advised and Non-advised.

 

Welcome sem to be trying to mix both...they state on the initial disclosure that they will assess your needs and advise (advised sale) yet their demands & needs is a basic brief desciption of each policy type....thats all you have to go on (and no personal info assessed whatsoever) to base a decision on (non-advised sale).

 

If they claim to have assessed yor suitability and advised you their insurance covers you then let them prove that. Like you said, in a durable medium, lets see them provide a single personal fact about any of us or a completed questionnair of any kind....Then lets see them prove the sale was fair, unbiased and in our best interests, actually provide some proof of this.

 

Sorry, reading so much of this just now, regurgitating automatically!

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha, you are right, it is this that will snooker them. I as reading up on this and there are 2 types of sales, Advised and Non-advised.

 

Welcome sem to be trying to mix both...they state on the initial disclosure that they will assess your needs and advise (advised sale) yet their demands & needs is a basic brief desciption of each policy type....thats all you have to go on (and no personal info assessed whatsoever) to base a decision on (non-advised sale).

 

If they claim to have assessed yor suitability and advised you their insurance covers you then let them prove that. Like you said, in a durable medium, lets see them provide a single personal fact about any of us or a completed questionnair of any kind....Then lets see them prove the sale was fair, unbiased and in our best interests, actually provide some proof of this.

 

Sorry, reading so much of this just now, regurgitating automatically!

 

 

dipply,

if you are up for a good read then this will give you a really good understanding of what we are talking about; section 5.2 is the part on needs and demands.

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/hb-releases/rel73/rel73icobs.pdf

get stuck into that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do Mojo! ;)

 

Post, read this, keeping in mind they claim you do not pay a fee for their service, and thy mention no commission:

 

ICOBS 4.3 Fee disclosure

 

 

ICOBS 4.3.1 rule_icon.gif06/01/2008 (1) A firm must provide its customer with details of the amount of any fees other than premium monies for an insurance mediation activity.

(2) The details must be given before the customer incurs liability to pay the fee, or before conclusion of the contract, whichever is earlier.

(3) To the extent that an actual fee cannot be given, a firm must give the basis for calculation.

 

ICOBS 4.3.2 guide_icon.gif06/01/2008 The fee disclosure requirement extends to all such fees that may be charged during the life of a policy. Their definition of Fee is: any payment or remuneration offered or made by a client to a firm in connection with designated investment business or with any other business of the firm, including (where applicable) any mark-up or mark-down.

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

There we are Mojo:

 

Statement of demands and needs

 

ICOBS 5.2.2 rule_icon.gif06/01/2008 (1) Prior to the conclusion of a contract, a firm must specify, in particular on the basis of information provided by the customer, the demands and the needs of that customer as well as the underlying reasons for any advice given to the customer on that policy.

(2) The details must be modulated according to the complexity of the policy proposed.

 

This details a demands & needs statement relevant to that individual customer, dtailing their actal demands & needs and their reasons for the advice given to THAT customer - not a generic 'one fits all' statement just describing the products and asking you to sign the bottom.

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I am at it, one of the basic points the FSA has crackd up about is the customer not bing told they can 'shop around' for PPI. If Welcome had actually listed NU as the insurer on th documentation, like their initial disclosre document states they will, you would concievably then have been abl to approach NU direct for a quote.

 

Wonder how much the price difference would have been :rolleyes:

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...