Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think rest of your lives is abit strong Bluebell although it may feel like it. Im sure theres one or two caggers that have won and gotten a debt removed for one reason or another.

Share your story to help others :)

use the below link, go to new thread button under notices and let it all out ;)

 

Welcome Finance - The Consumer Forums

Edited by beyondhope
add link

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yeh sorry just a bit stressed and rather downtrodden at moment, so much going on, I have been reading the info. about welcome and cattles you guys post and took a look at others posts, not sure if i want to talk to much yet, but definately going to check my agreement. Lovin all the stuff you guys do though its awesome, made me smile :) and horrible to say but glad am not the only one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmmmmmmmm

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all just to get something out of my head and onto the page so to speak.

I have been thinking following some shal we say unforseen decisions in our courts, do judges have to disclose thier interests such as investments etc. and dont they have a duty to withdraw from any cases where they could possibly have an interest, not suggesting for a minute that there has been any wrong doing in any case mentioned in any of the forums but just a question that has been occupying my empty head for a while.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other day on GMTV an adviser on loan agreements said that very few agreements are actually unenforcible even though there are mistakes etc. He said the courts would enforce 99% of so called unenforcible agreements, I took this to mean even those with prescibed terms missing. He was commenting on the growth of those companies that profess to get the debt cleared for an up front payment. I am wondering how this leaves all of us, this news was quite depressing. What actually is the real reality I wonder?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too read this somewhere that people are being mis informed by these companies or hearing a snippet of something and misinterpreting the cca and putting accounts into dispute etc and not actually getting anywhere :( and that far too many ppl are using the cca request against companies to put their accounts into dispute for no 'proper' reason

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too read this somewhere that people are being mis informed by these companies or hearing a snippet of something and misinterpreting the cca and putting accounts into dispute etc and not actually getting anywhere :( and that far too many ppl are using the cca request against companies to put their accounts into dispute for no 'proper' reason

 

We must also remember that for all of this negativity that there is still a perfectly valid route to take in the event that a creditor does not comply. It is not the case that a stranger can issue in the court against you for £10,000 and produce a bus ticket with a Mr. Man picture on it to win the claim.

 

Granted, the rights of the creditors have been strengthened to some extent which I personally feel is bordering on fraud and a complete bypass of 'fair play' but that's banking and finance for you. As the great British public are happy to do no more than winge at each other whilst handing their earnings over at the same time every month we'll all just have to accept it.

 

The Waksman result was far from terminal and we must also remember the claimant was the individual and that the burden of proof was effectively reversed. Also, if a creditor produces a reconstituted agreement there is a whole avenue of inquiry open to you in order to assess that this piece of paper is in fact a true copy. Let's face it, if the original has gone you need to do quite a bit to prove that what you are now presenting is in fact a true copy of something that can no longer be checked.

 

There is a lot of propoganda at the moment, I'd advise a cautious approach and to sit back and wait for the new lines of attack to surface. It will happen I'm sure, it is early days though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We must also remember that for all of this negativity that there is still a perfectly valid route to take in the event that a creditor does not comply. It is not the case that a stranger can issue in the court against you for £10,000 and produce a bus ticket with a Mr. Man picture on it to win the claim.

 

Granted, the rights of the creditors have been strengthened to some extent which I personally feel is bordering on fraud and a complete bypass of 'fair play' but that's banking and finance for you. As the great British public are happy to do no more than winge at each other whilst handing their earnings over at the same time every month we'll all just have to accept it.

 

The Waksman result was far from terminal and we must also remember the claimant was the individual and that the burden of proof was effectively reversed. Also, if a creditor produces a reconstituted agreement there is a whole avenue of inquiry open to you in order to assess that this piece of paper is in fact a true copy. Let's face it, if the original has gone you need to do quite a bit to prove that what you are now presenting is in fact a true copy of something that can no longer be checked.

 

There is a lot of propoganda at the moment, I'd advise a cautious approach and to sit back and wait for the new lines of attack to surface. It will happen I'm sure, it is early days though.

 

That sums up where we stand at this time as customers/ victims very well. Each case has you so rightly say, will be assessed on it`s own merits. And some of these Agreements are as good has a Bus Ticket.

 

I also think it is a Positive in many ways that people are " Jumping on the Bandwagon ". That says to me that " The Great British Public " are Waking up to what THEIR RIGHTS are.

 

Cheers, MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Sorry to be a messenger of doom but I have seen various people on here saying that they are going to do this and do that with Welcome Finance.

 

i.e the Fraud Squad, the Inland Revenue, the National Press, Television or whatever.

 

Unfortunately whether any of us like it or not, we are indebted to these people as we borrowed money from them and despite some of their practices, a debt is a debt.

 

Becoming a Bankrupt or taking out a Debt Relief Order is the only way to shake these people off.

 

I have been honest and up front with Welcome and they have frozen all my interest and other charges and I am paying them a very reduced amount which they have accepted.

 

" You cannot get blood out of a stone "

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

I have been honest and up front with Welcome and they have frozen all my interest and other charges and I am paying them a very reduced amount which they have accepted.

 

" You cannot get blood out of a stone "

 

Really?? What sort of finance do u have with them? ie Car, Secured etc.

 

how much do u owe and how much did you and do you now pay a month?

 

sorry for the questions, but really interested in this and would like to see if you in a similar postion to me as i would be interested in arranging this if at all possible as I am a stone with little blood too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Voda, you was the one that was shoting the loudest about going to watchdog here . and you also contacted Dom Littlewood here .

Here you also wanted welcome employees to PM you so you could meet with them . . .

 

Point I am making is that in your words they have made you ill and put you through all kinds of crap, just reading your posts I can tell what you have been through so I am sure you can understand everyones frustrations and motive to fight back.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said OZZY. Sorry Voda but, yes you have done well for your self arranging these things with the ****. And I`m sure we all wish you the best of luck.

 

You are also quite right you can NOT get blood out of a stone. I believe most people who have a gripe with Welscum would and have been trying to pay what they owe. It is obvious though, not everybody has been afforded the same level of understanding which you have been very fortunate to receive.

 

Let`s face it if they were honest and up front in their dealings from the beginning, and fair in their approach to ALL who are having difficulties then their would be no need for these kind of forums.

 

They do not play the game by the set down rules. At least everyone of us is doing that. They deserve everything they get, or don`t get because of this attitude of being above the LAW.

 

Cheers, MARK

Edited by mark1arby
deletion
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/244025-delfi101-et-al-weightmans-2.html#post2729941

 

Please please please, do not look from the doom and gloom point of view, see the above thread, the case above would have been declared "enforceable" by many on this forum, we took it to trial, won and recovered our costs in doing so.

 

Welcome are notorious at making errors, we have hundreds of cases on the go against this type of lender and we have yet to lose a case where we have gone to trial against them. I accept that you are reliant on the docs givng you the ammo and sometimes there is no unenforceability but the fact remains that 9 times outtta 10 its in our favor not the lenders

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Thank you for your posts.

 

Yes I tried the media but nobody replied to me.

 

I fully accept that there are others on here that have been dealt with very badly by this company so I suppose that I have been fortunate.

 

I suppose that I have got to an age when the fight has left me now.

 

Gram 1, my loan was simply a Personal Loan.

 

It's not a secured loan or for a car.

 

Let's just say that I am now only paying around 10% of the original monthly amount and it will take years to pay off the loan.

 

WF would rather have some money than none at all so after providing them with my monthly income and expenditure that was endorsed by the Debt charity CCCS, they had no option but to accept the figure that I could afford each month.

 

Good luck with everything.

 

Voda

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Yes they have frozen the interest and other charges.

 

I recently received a statement from them and there are no charges anymore.

 

They have not actually said that this freezing is for the lifetime of the loan.

 

I suggest that the best way to deal with WF is to talk to them like I have done.

 

Voda

 

Are you absolutely certain that they have frozen the interest and charges? Welcome wouldn't be Welcome without some [problem] or other. If they have frozen the interest and charges, have they agreed to do so for the lifetime of the loan?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck to you if they have done this but I'd be sceptical of it lasting for the lifetime of the loan. And then where will your reduced payment get you once they re-apply interest and charges every month?

 

If you can get the balance down quickly whilst it's sans interest then fair enough but I've had 8 years of dealings with Welcome and if they told me it was Wednesday, I'd buy a newspaper to make sure.

 

I hope you got everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally with you Ted, before I sent one letter I tried in vain for 5 months to discuss and resolve by talking to them . . only with shear desperation I wrote a letter and did my homework to realize there was far more wrong than my orriginal "small" query.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Voda

 

I appreciate how stressed and despondent Welcome situations can make you feel but I urge that you keep a very close eye on your accounts and credit records. In my personal experience Welcome agreed to "freeze charges/interest" in my situation, only for me to then be defaulted behind the scenes and extra charges added to compensate the interest they froze. Bear in mind that they are under immense scrutiny at the moment and need to be seen to be playing by the rules, indeed they may become lawful and reasonable in their actions if they survive as a company? Who knows? But many people are, as has been said on this forum, not treated as fairly. I would be having a cautionary attitude and microscopic eye on your account, if you don't already have it, get it in writing the term the interest will be held and how much will be applied when that is up, and perhaps be prepared for harassment again for increasing payments after a period of time. I do wish you all the best and glad it has been resolved somewhat for you.

 

am :)

 

Hi,

 

Yes they have frozen the interest and other charges.

 

I recently received a statement from them and there are no charges anymore.

 

They have not actually said that this freezing is for the lifetime of the loan.

 

I suggest that the best way to deal with WF is to talk to them like I have done.

 

Voda

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the only one with a cautious word!! I must type quicker!!!!:grin:

 

Good luck to you if they have done this but I'd be sceptical of it lasting for the lifetime of the loan. And then where will your reduced payment get you once they re-apply interest and charges every month?

 

If you can get the balance down quickly whilst it's sans interest then fair enough but I've had 8 years of dealings with Welcome and if they told me it was Wednesday, I'd buy a newspaper to make sure.

 

I hope you got everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...