Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Correct but wont stop them chasing you though even if no payment for  6 years (statute Barred) Some DCA s buy debts (the debt is assigned to them) and some do issue court claims ...just so you are aware.   Andy
    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As Long As It Rattled Mr P

 

Judges Are Well Aware Of Welcome Finance

 

Mud Sticks

 

No Smoke With Out Fire

 

He seems perfectly at home in that court - I have the feeling he's been there a lot :D

 

Was thinking about getting the case transeferred to a court by me so I don't have to traipse all that way back with my money - it's just not safe :lol:

 

On a serious note though - it would be easier than me going to them - and it would be interesting to see if they'd come to another court.

 

The only reason they turn up is it's on his doorstep and he's got nothing else to do with his time til his redundancy comes through

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Andi, i think the rule of thumb on defaults are they must be handserved into our hand, or they must arrive through recorded post...agan if somone could clarify this it would be helpful.

 

The date on the "without prejudice" letter is 11 may, but only states fourteen (14) days..in bold print, the paragraph in my previous post is word for word...

 

The default notice attatched to letter, has 11 may 09 as date of notice... the actual wording from this stated further down in the notice is..

"To remedy the breach you must pay to us the total arrears of (increased by £226 in 1 week) within fourteen (14) days."

"IF THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE IS TAKEN BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN NO FURTHER ENFORCEMENTACTION WILL BE TAKEN IN RESPECT OF THE BREACH."

blah blah...

This notice has not been signed by anyone??

 

 

HAS A DATE BEEN INSERTED, NOT THE 14 DAYS TO RECTIFY THE BREACH

 

WELCOME STILL CANT DO A DECENT DEFAULT NOTICE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andi, i think the rule of thumb on defaults are they must be handserved into our hand, or they must arrive through recorded post...agan if somone could clarify this it would be helpful.

 

The date on the "without prejudice" letter is 11 may, but only states fourteen (14) days..in bold print, the paragraph in my previous post is word for word...

 

The default notice attatched to letter, has 11 may 09 as date of notice... the actual wording from this stated further down in the notice is..

"To remedy the breach you must pay to us the total arrears of (increased by £226 in 1 week) within fourteen (14) days."

"IF THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE IS TAKEN BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN NO FURTHER ENFORCEMENTACTION WILL BE TAKEN IN RESPECT OF THE BREACH."

blah blah...

This notice has not been signed by anyone??

 

Invalid default it must say blah blah blah 14 days {DATE when the 14 days is up}

 

toilet paper!

 

get your complaints going!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Invalid default it must say blah blah blah 14 days {DATE when the 14 days is up}

 

toilet paper!

 

get your complaints going!

 

Just read the notice they issued me with... no date :)

 

Right who do i complain too? and what is the relevent piece of legislation/ best practice or whatever...

 

Can they get anything right :?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's the CCA 1974 thats the relevent legislation

 

Section 88 sets out the Contents and Effects of a Default Notice:

Quote:

 

(88) Contents and effect of default notice.

 

(1) The default notice must be in the prescribed form and specify -

 

(a) the nature of the alleged breach;

 

(b) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date before which that action is to be taken;

 

© if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach, and the date before which it is to be paid.

 

(2) A date specified under subsection (1) must not be less than seven days (14 Days from 19/12/2006, see below) after the date of service of the default notice, and the creditor or owner shall not take action such as is mentioned in section 87(1) before the date so specified or (if no requirement is made under subsection (1)) before those seven days have elapsed.

 

(3) The default notice must not treat as a breach failure to comply with a provision of the agreement which becomes operative only on breach of some other provision, but if the breach of that other provision is not duly remedied or compensation demanded under subsection (1) is not duly paid, or (where no requirement is made under subsection (1)) if the seven days mentioned in subsection (2) have elapsed (now 14 Days, see below), the creditor or owner may treat the failure as a breach and section 87(1) shall not apply to it.

 

(4) The default notice must contain information in the prescribed terms about the consequences of failure to comply with it.

 

(5) A default notice making a requirement under subsection (1) may include a provision for the taking of action such as is mentioned in section 87(1) at any time after the restriction imposed by subsection (2) will cease, together with a statement that the provision will be ineffective if the breach is duly remedied or the compensation duly paid.

 

The Act does mention the word Date, suggesting that is what Parliament wanted to see appear in a Default Notice...

Quote:

(b) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date before which that action is to be taken;

See also the following:

 

Quote:

See: Consumer Credit Act (1974) and related Regulations

 

The PDF you want is Post #4 of the above Sticky Thread, and it's PDF number 6...

 

Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561)

 

Details of breach of agreement and action required to remedy, or pay compensation for, the breach

 

3

 

A specification of:--

 

(a) the provision of the agreement alleged to have been breached; and

 

(b) the nature of the alleged breach of the agreement, specifying clearly the matters complained of; and either

 

© if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date, being a date [not less than fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which that action is to be taken; or

 

(d) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach and the date, being a date [not less than fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which it is to be paid.

 

To confirm when the 7 Days became 14 Days, look further down to the notes towards the bottom...

Quote:

 

NOTES

 

Amendment

 

Para 3: in sub-paras ©, (d) words "not less than fourteen days" in square brackets substituted by SI 2006/3094, regs 2, 3.

 

Date in force: 19 December 2006: see SI 2006/3094, reg 1.

 

The key part that affects this would be:

 

Quote:

(d) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach and the date, being a date [not less than fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which it is to be paid.

The word date is therefore mentioned several times!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Invalid default it must say blah blah blah 14 days {DATE when the 14 days is up}

 

toilet paper!

 

get your complaints going!

 

Just what i thought, thanks guys!

 

So when do you expect round 3 to commence, Andi?

 

Post good to see you back on the thread!

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just what i thought, thanks guys!

 

So when do you expect round 3 to commence, Andi?

 

Post good to see you back on the thread!

 

 

First date after 35 days - so me thinking end July beginning of august.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really just want him to say "this is my show" when we're in bed that would be soooooooooo funny :D

 

or at the very least recording it so I can have it as my message tone!

 

 

Oh god I need help!!

 

 

:eek::eek:UUUURRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!

 

TOO MUCH INFORMATION, ANDI :p

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys , i have two accounts with welcome,

got this the other day-

we refer to your enquiry in which you requested a settlement figure along with a request that we provide an undertaking to remove our interest.

 

you may accept this letter as our undertaking that upon receipt of the full settlement the discharge documents will be sent to the relevent land registry district to remove our interest.

can anyone guess the type of account this refers to ,

well guys what do you think?.

 

received this on the 25th of last month with a 50% discount to settle and was only valid till the end of the month.

requested another on the 29th of the month, valid for 31days and the amount is less than the last but still 50% discount.??

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcome are very good at speaking double dutch

 

if you are doing a settlement, get the figures in writing

 

now the 50 % discount sounds very good but it depends on how long you have had the loan and how much has been paid back

 

blood out of a stone comes to mind getting a statement from welcome

 

welcome/cattles are desperate for money at the moment so some seriouse discount can be done

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, have no idea why it say stuff about the land registry,

i have an unsecured loan, paid for two years with no statements,

i havnt see the agreement for the car, car was taken out jan 08.

sent requests first week in feb 09,

paid loan for two years and only found out after a telephone call with them in jan 09 that i was paying for ppi on the loan

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think as usual, welcome have done you up like a kipper,

they realise this from your sar that you want answers

the 50% discount seems to be a carrot

 

they are in default of your sar,

ill post a letter in a mo to send

 

did you send the sar by recorded delievery and was it sent to compliance in nottingham

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...