Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi all

- I am gutted I was expecting to get up and welcome would be no more :(

I wonder why they haven't released there results yet??? I thought they had to do this before the end of the financial year?

 

Anyway slightly off track I know but I can't get an answer at compliance department does anyone know if they have an e-mail address? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a call last night offering me a re-write if i make this months payment today.... it sounds as if they are desperate to collect as much money today.

 

Go Mojo!! what they offering??

 

Tell them you will think about it at 0.5% APR

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to the FD of the company I work for , he recons that is the actions of a company in BIG trouble but he says they will survive a little while yet unless something else big happens.

Case Statistics 13 Wins - 0 Losses

Cases In Progress 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE 1-Cattles says loans to units may be subordinated

 

31-MAR-2009 08:22

 

LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - Troubled British sub-prime lender Cattles said on Tuesday it may have to take second place to bank creditors in recovering loans it made to its own subsidiaries.

 

In a statement, Cattles said guarantees held by bank creditors may give them priority over the company's own repayment claims against its operating units.

 

Shares in Cattles, already under pressure due to concerns over the group's funding, have collapsed in the past six weeks after the company issued several profit warnings and said it had uncovered accounting errors.

 

The company, which lends to people who cannot get credit from mainstream banks, revealed earlier this month that it had breached its banking covenants, and warned it would make a loss for 2008.

 

Cattles said on Tuesday it was looking into the legal effect of its bank creditors' guarantees, and would provide a further update 'in due course.'

 

Cattles shares closed at 3.2 pence on Monday, down 84 percent since the beginning of the year.

 

(Reporting by Myles Neligan; Editing by Rupert Winchester) Keywords: CATTLES/

 

([email protected]; + 44 207 542 13 73)

 

 

Basically this mean, Erm in Stewie's own understanding.

 

Cattles has several companies and these companies have loaned monies to each other internally. Subsidiaries of Cattles that have loaned the company money are second in line to be repaid. First the banks, then stake/bond holders and then shareholders.

 

Basically this stops them from worming their way out of getting rid of any cash in case they go under. Like taking a loan from my family and then a loan from the bank. I loose my job, I should pay my bank first and family come second (Ok ok weird example, but you get the point)

 

Stewie

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go Mojo!! what they offering??

 

Tell them you will think about it at 0.5% APR

 

I have told them that if i was to do a re-write then the contract needs to be backed up with a breakdown of everything and will be subject to being cross checked by an expert....surprisingly he would not agree, he came back with a new monthly figure instantly but would not disclose the breakdown over the phone ... he told me he would call me today to collect my monthly payment... i told him to shove it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this what they are doing now ? Offering re-writes ? Should I expect a call ?? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm I wonder what the nicest way I can tell them to go away is ?? lol :lol:

Edited by HSBCrusher
language

Forsure

 

** One woman crusade against the rip off lenders ! **

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically this mean, Erm in Stewie's own understanding.

 

Cattles has several companies and these companies have loaned monies to each other internally. Subsidiaries of Cattles that have loaned the company money are second in line to be repaid. First the banks, then stake/bond holders and then shareholders.

 

Basically this stops them from worming their way out of getting rid of any cash in case they go under. Like taking a loan from my family and then a loan from the bank. I loose my job, I should pay my bank first and family come second (Ok ok weird example, but you get the point)

 

Stewie

 

 

your right stewie, thats a good example in laymans terms.

 

I cannot see how cattles can survive. All revenue collected by the subsideries such as welcome will be blead dry of everything that comes in through there banks and no funds will be fed up through the cattles system. This means that all none essential parts of welcome will close as there will be little working capital to operate with and collecting may be done from strategically positioned offices around the UK, there is no point in keeping offices round the uk open that are going to be a drain on available cash. The banks will look for every available source of cash and asset including secured loan books. There is also all the uncollectable debt and the issues with HMRC, fraudulent insurance policies.... i think we may see welcome round for a couple of months until they have been blead dry. I may be wrong but i hope im not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this what they are doing now ? Offering re-writes ? Should I expect a call ?? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm I wonder what the nicest way I can tell them to go away is ?? lol :lol:

 

 

I have a sneaking suspicion that we are not dealing with your average welcome employee here. For some reason and no explanation our dealings have now changed offices and are dealing with people that we have not dealt with before. These people may have been drafted in to try and secure as much money as possible by taking a more polite approach, offering re-writes and doing deals, this may also be part of there in-house cleaning and way of getting dodgy agreements either re-written or paid up... just be wary of any offers they make.. and suspicious.

Edited by HSBCrusher
language
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, how can branches survive if they are unable to lend at present.

 

Rewrites at lower APR will not be as profitable.

 

your right stewie, thats a good example in laymans terms.

 

I cannot see how cattles can survive. All revenue collected by the subsideries such as welcome will be blead dry of everything that comes in through there banks and no funds will be fed up through the cattles system. This means that all none essential parts of welcome will close as there will be little working capital to operate with and collecting may be done from strategically positioned offices around the UK, there is no point in keeping offices round the uk open that are going to be a drain on available cash. The banks will look for every available source of cash and asset including secured loan books. There is also all the uncollectable debt and the issues with HMRC, fraudulent insurance policies.... i think we may see welcome round for a couple of months until they have been blead dry. I may be wrong but i hope im not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are your views andie303

what would postggj think

i for one am dumbfounded

i think there has been a little scullduggery in the meetings with cattles and creditors and deloitte !!!!

 

my honest opinion is the same as it has always been. it's not the lse or the traders that will schedule the end of this company. it will be brought down by government agencies investigating criminal activities

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, how can branches survive if they are unable to lend at present.

 

Rewrites at lower APR will not be as profitable.

 

 

Thats what i mean, branches will close but a couple of strategically placed offices aroung the uk will be used to collect, these will be funded by self generated minimum working capital. There is obviously a lot more to it yet and i suspect that cattles being as devious as they are will probrabley have a legal team as we speak looking at the contracts between them and the banks to try and stop this all happening.... i just cant see how they could get out of this.... therers statement says it all and coupled with what we know on this thread.. they are gonners

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, how can branches survive if they are unable to lend at present.

 

Rewrites at lower APR will not be as profitable.

 

 

At present I don’t think they are concerned about profits or lending to sustain the company going forward. Its about the here and now and if they will survive the next few weeks.

If I was a holder of Cattles stock, I would want answers or at least some idea of what is happening with the money I have invested.

I would be very very careful with the offer of new contracts and lower APR deals. You have this whole thread as evidence of the suspect dealings Welcome are willing to do at any cost!

WFS could not give a s**t about your well being or your personal circumstances I can assure you. Its all about the green.

Rule of thumb with Welcome.

If it looks like a rat, it smells like a rat. Then guess what. It is a rat!

If it sounds too good to be true, then it often is!

Nothing in this world is for free!

Ok enough of that :grin: I couldn’t help myself for a minute

Stewie

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, how can branches survive if they are unable to lend at present.

 

Rewrites at lower APR will not be as profitable.

 

Re writes at a lower apr would be better than a total loss on that account if lets say it should show up in a national newspaper that the contract may be invalid.

Case Statistics 13 Wins - 0 Losses

Cases In Progress 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, how can branches survive if they are unable to lend at present.

 

Rewrites at lower APR will not be as profitable.

 

 

it all about damage limitation, even at a lower APR it may well be a way of getting dodgy agreements more secure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...