Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • And the date would be helpful .....PI claims have a Statute of Limitation of 3 years.  I would contact your daughter and get her to pass it on to her Insurance company to deal with...that's why you have Insurance.
    • I received a penalty notice for parking on a town carpark monitored by G24.  I am a 73 year old NHS Responder and had an urgent request to collect emergency medication for a neighbour.  In my haste I parked as near to the pharmacy as I could, thinking I would be only a couple of minutes and also believing that the car park was free because of the lockdown. There was a queue in the pharmacy and it took me half an hour to get the medication.  My neighbour died shortly afterwards.  I received the penalty notice from G24 demanding £100, and immediately responded with an appeal.  They claim they responded but I did not receive the letter.  A second, identical, penalty notice arrived two months later and I again responded immediately with a copy of my previous letter.  G24 responded and denied my appeal, then referred me to an Independent Appeal Service in Macclesfield.  The IAS refuted my claim, saying I am out of time because I did not respond within 21 days when my first appeal was denied - this is because that communication did not reach me. G24 have confirmed that they are willing for my independent appeal to proceed but the IAS now want £15 to consider the appeal and have rejected my application.  I cannot afford this amount and it is extremely unfair to penalise me for doing my Christian duty when a vulnerable person was in dire need.  I am an NHS Responder voluntarily and at my own expense, so why should I have to pay out £100 when consideration should be given to the circumstances surrounding the "misdemeanour".  Yes, I parked, but if an ambulance had parked, would there still have been a penalty charge ?  I was as much part of the NHS as an ambulance on that occasion and therefore I feel strongly that G24 should take the circumstances into account.
    • https://www.google.com/maps/place/Hazlebarrow+Rd,+Jordanthorpe,+Sheffield/@53.3249661,-1.4618968,192a,35y,180h/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4879830fcbc4e607:0xa8514d877d9f3e37!8m2!3d53.3252332!4d-1.4624469   Bank fodder, I don't know from where your image is, but the link that I have produced above is the location of the collision, opposite no 41 Hazlebarrow Road, just before the place where there are three white lines across the grass. You will see that there is minimal bend in the road although there is more bend earlier near the junction with Ormond Way, so emphasising this is steering the OP in the wrong direction.   The OP did mention in an early post the speed of 30 mph., but I suspect that this was merely an indication that she does not consider that she was speeding, rather than a precise speed.
    • Really just what can she do? Due to covid she may have to wait 2/3 and be unable to drive plus why are the fines so High? We dont even know if she was driving as we both use the same cars regularly Is it better to download an SD and complete or better to attend the court to do this as we are unsure as to what the court office has done this morning   Thanks  
    • They have to have grounds to disagree....its based on your Financial I & E..if all you can afford is £10pm...that's what they get if the court orders it.   You can fight a CO application...but as its a joint mortgage and debt...it would be very difficult..not impossible...but why bother ? 
  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 27 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

The MP's campaign-Responses


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4751 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

ohoh, could you let me know what his name is please, you forgot to give me it, thanks

 

D'OH!!!

 

Andrew Pelling.

 

Sorry!

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Joan Humble MP.

got a reply in writing today, apparrently one of her aids wrote to the oft asking about the situation and all she advised me to do was to read the leaflett she recieved, and that was it. what are we paying them for?, i could have done that!!!!

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

baconbuttyman

 

What a derisory response! I'd write straight back to her with that very point. I don't know who else saw it, but Peter Oborne's excellent documentary on C4 last night really brought home where our political representatives' priorities lie :roll:

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites
D'OH!!!

 

Andrew Pelling.

 

Sorry!

 

Not to worry ohoh, & thank you.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Joan Humble MP.

got a reply in writing today, apparrently one of her aids wrote to the oft asking about the situation and all she advised me to do was to read the leaflett she recieved, and that was it. what are we paying them for?, i could have done that!!!!

 

I think I should mark Joan Humble as a (green) Not Interested, & only sending you a leaflet; what good is that ?? I agree wholeheartedly, what are we paying them for ??

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks as though we are going to have to hope & pray that the majority of honest politicians outweigh the corrupt politicians, & that at the end of the day, they will be helping us challenge the banks.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi olden, it would be great if there were. Unfortunately there seems to be an awful lot of MP's that are retiring just before the next election lol.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Macboy & Ja-de,

On return from my Hols I have received reply from Joan Humble MP.

 

Dear Mr Croze,

Further to previous correspondence, I enclose for your attention a copy of a letter I have received from the Financial Services Authority in response to enquiries I have made on your behalf.

 

I hope you will find this information helpful and of interest.

 

Blah Blah Blah.

 

Joan Humble.

 

attached is a 2 page letter from Dr. Thomas Huertas that he says he was asked by Hector Sants to send. also attached is a copy of the press release of 27 July.

 

do you want me to scan and let you have a copy of the reply? I am sure that I have read it somewhere else.

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stone

 

Welcome back and hope you had a great break! There has been another response from Joan Humble further up the thread (less than impressive I might add :roll:).

 

However, if there's anything different to add then by all means post it - that's what we've had this new thread set up for ;)

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Joan Humble MP.

got a reply in writing today, apparrently one of her aids wrote to the oft asking about the situation and all she advised me to do was to read the leaflett she recieved, and that was it. what are we paying them for?, i could have done that!!!!

 

 

Me too!!!!

It wasn't Clare Curtis Thomas was it??

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Stone

 

Welcome back and hope you had a great break! There has been another response from Joan Humble further up the thread (less than impressive I might add :roll:).

 

However, if there's anything different to add then by all means post it - that's what we've had this new thread set up for ;)

 

 

I haven`t done this before so lets see if the old dog has learned a new trick.

 

joanhumble1.jpg

 

joanhumble2.jpg

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done you, Stone :D Nicely geek-ed ;)

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well done you, Stone :D Nicely geek-ed ;)

 

This response from Mrs. Humble comes after pestering her. Email her at Westminster, wrote to her at constituency office and all so Email to PA at Westminster. So maybe she just got pee`d off whith me!

  • Haha 1

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like our Joan is anything but humble, stone :roll:

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All

 

Please can you use the correct thread to notify when you've written to an MP?

 

Thanks

Mac

  • Haha 1
  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome back stone, hope you had a nice holiday.

  • Haha 1

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Welcome back stone, hope you had a nice holiday.

 

Thanks Ja-de, yeah we had a great time chillin out, Things are moving on for me now, chack my thread. rearin to go again.

 

stargate6.gif

  • Haha 1

=======================================================================================================

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

 

 

Halifax Won £1180.00

NatWest Won £876.00

Halifax 2 N1 submitted 20/07/07 stayed 24/08/07 N244 Application filed 31/08/07 hearing set for 12/11/07 rescheduled for 29/01/2008. Application dismissed stay still in place.

Charity Group £200 compo for lost passport.

HM revenue & Customs; demand for WTC overpayment £632.12. Disputed, their error. Did not have to repay.

All opinions expressed are my own and have no legal standing and no connection to CAG

 

All errors/typos etc are not my fault the blame lies with the spelling gremlins

 

<<<<<< If any of this has been helpful, PLEASE click my scales

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do, & thank you for the click.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

stone, the letter is a standard template the FSA sent to all of us mine is exactly the same, they must think we are stupid!! They don't seem to have an inkling about this do they, what the hell is Joan Humble on about, any plans to clarify the legal position ? doesn't she know anything about whats being going on?? about the OFT case??

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...