Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Courts & Stays


Noddy73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks, I just went to post office and sent DG Solicitors and Wandsworth Court the following letter: (I also faxed this and to the court- suggested by the court) and included a copy of the DG letter.

 

On a side note: I do believe that the date was August 2nd - because if I had to send it to the Court by that date, I cant imagine why they would get a later date.....? Anyway, just called the Court, they confirmed it was the 2nd. They suggested I wait to hear from them about the stay. If dont hearing anything, I should presume that the court date moves forward (August 28th) rather than spending the £65 and writing the n224 (i think that was it). Anyway, the court guy seemed to think that the case will be stayed....but the judges are using their own judgement...anyting can happen...thanks for your help....

 

I strongly object to the proposed order of a stay in respect of the claim detailed above upon the following grounds;

 

Human rights

 

Blah blah...

 

The Status Quo

Blah blah....

 

In the alternative

 

In view of the preceding paragraphs, if the court accedes to the defendant’s application for a stay notwithstanding these objections, I respectfully request that the court issues the following injunctions:

  • That the defendant bank is prevented from applying further penalty charges to my account until the final settlement of the matter.
  • That the defendant is prevented from applying interest charges to any outstanding amounts which are comprised of penalties until the settlement of the matter.
  • That the defendant is prevented from closing my account.
  • That the defendant is prevented from making any entry on its own systems or from communicating any similar information to any third party about any matter insofar as it relates to penalty charges until the final settlement of the matter.
  • That the defendant removes any derogatory entry on its own records insofar as it relates to penalty charges. (The Court has the power to do this under the Data Protection Act 1998 )
  • That the defendant arranges the removal of entries from the records of any third parties to whom it has previously communicated information insofar as it relates to penalty charges. (The Court has the power to do this under the Data protection Act 1998.)
  • That these injunctions remain in place until the settlement of my claim.
  • That should my claim proceed to a hearing that a decision should be made at the hearing as to whether these injunctions should be made permanent.
  • That if the matter should not proceed to a hearing because the defendant decides to settle outside court, that these injunctions should become permanent.

I, the Claimant, believe all facts stated to be true.

 

Robert Lissmann

August 17th, 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

so basically what was in the letter which I sent to them today about with headings Human rights, The Overriding Objective, Balance of convenience, The Status Quo, In the alternative etc.

Trying not loose any hope here, but those jerky solicitors may get there stay...i hope this high court thing gets resolved quickly...!

Thanks for your help...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will depend on each individual judge, another thing you could consider using in part C is all the claims they have settled so far since the OFT announcement......... and also some of the ones which the court has struck itself as abuse of process..................

 

the more info you can put in C the better I now feel..............

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Birmingham CC

 

The claim is stayed until further order with a view to awaiting the decision in the test case. Either party my apply at any time by application on notice in accordance with CPR23, to lift the stay. If there is no such application by 30th September 2008, the court will in any event then consider whether to make a further order.

 

So Birmingham are expecting it to last at least a year :evil:

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Huntingdon County Court - Telephoned this morning, All claims are being automatically stayed until OFT case is concluded

Regards

Sophie

 

Thank you

 

Please Note

Advice & opinions of Sophie-Jane are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please confirm:

 

I received letter from DG Solicitors about their intent to apply for a stay. I immediatly sent off a letter protesting their request with the template as above.

 

I would also now like to send in the N224 form - which in my understanding wii mean it gets thrown out becasue Dg missed their August 2nd date of filing for a defence.

 

Still unclear about what to write in part c - does this cost money to file...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nyc thsi is what i did top left hadn corner............ ticked the hearing box......... that is all I did in that box, you could however if oyu want specify the level of jusge.... and parties to be served put DG there........... part A 1 your name.......

 

2 removal of stay order grante don 06.08.2007 and defence be struck out.........

 

part 3 the defendant breached rule 3.4.(2)(b) and you coudl put in © as well................ and human rights act 1998 article 6 of the convention , record of contact between claimant and defendant............... part b

 

ticked the box evidence in part c in support

 

4 signed my name

and address and phone number and email addy

 

over the page on C wrote please fidn attached the supporting evidence, copy letters handed into the court on 26.07.2007 requesting the defence be struck

 

copy of th ehuman rights act 1998 article 6

copy of contact between claimant adn defendant...................

 

statement of truth sign and date................

 

attact copies of everything and make sure the claim ref no is on everythign either type it or hadn write it on the top...........

  • Haha 1

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Request for Judgment by Default (County Court N227) can be elected in the event that the Defendant fails to file a defence within 14 days of service of the summons.

 

To commence such proceedings County Court form N227 should be completed and then sent to the relevant Court with accompanying letter.

 

County Court form N227 is applied where the claim is for an unspecified amount which is to be decided by the Court. County Court Form N225 should be completed for specified amounts.

 

This Request for Judgment by default template is in fixed field format and password protected. Simply press TAB to jump from one field to the next and SHIFT + TAB to go back. Alternatively, use the mouse to click from one field to the next.

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

whislt no expert here but I do nto think you can use the N227 as it states failingot submit a defence within the 14 days..........

 

they did that..............

 

they faile dto submit what requested by the court which is something totally different and is covered under the N244 but that is only my view, othe might know better............

 

I can only go on what I have used....

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bow county court have stayed my case. I filled through MCOL on 1st May 2007 and have only just found out today. I'm so angry, initially I had an order saying that there was no AQ, then one just turned up in the post so I filed it, HSBC didn't even bother and now my case has been stayed. Is there anything I can do? I mean this would have come to a conclusion a while back if there had been no AQ as I was instructed back in June.

 

Very upset, feel like I've been misold information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On Monday at Eastbourne County Court, deputy district judge Parkes lifted a stay on a claim by a man from Hailsham in Sussex, who argued that his bank, HSBC, had procrastinated for months after he first asked for the return of his overdraft charges. That case will now be heard in September.

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

cribgirl you need to check online with your mcol claim and see if you can get a print out of the dates... or phone the court and ask for it........ then have a look at the courts own civil procedures. there are certain form for certain things...... in your case i am sure it is the N227 ........

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Received letter from Preston CC today telling me my case against HSBC has been allocated to the small claims track and will be heard on 25 Sept. 07.

What has been DG solicitors response recently - are they applying for stays, fighting the cases in court or making last minute offers? Anyone help?

 

wazbc

Link to post
Share on other sites

so reading thru that BBC News report, if a stay on the case will cause hardship, u can apply to have it lifted? Would it not make sense to just go for that so long as u can prove it?

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...