Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How many times can a Judgment be set aside for the same reason?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all. I'm Weird Al and new here.

 

Could somebody please advise?

 

Can a defendant apply for a second set aside for the same reason as given for the first set aside-namely-that they haven't filed a defence?

 

If this will be granted again then surely there must come a point where the Judge has to say enough is enough.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the Attention of the Case Manager

 

In the matter of

 

XXX vs Weird Al Yankovic

 

Claim Number XXX

 

In XXX Court

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Soliciters Address

 

DATE

 

YOUR ADDRESS

 

 

Dear Sir Or Madam,

 

RE: RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR SET ASIDE,

 

I have recieved a application for set aside from the defence, and would like to respectfully submit to the court my reasons for objecting to it:

 

On DATE, the defendant applied for a set aside for a judgement in default to be set aside.

 

The defendant claimed that he was either unable to file a defence, or did not know that the court required a defence to be filed.

 

This set aside was granted.

 

The defendant has again failed to file a defence on time. It has not asked me to provide any clarification or disclosure or to negotiate with me in any way as to the management of the case. Neither did it inform me or the court of any reason for failing to file a defence before the date of the defence.

 

It is clear the defendant was aware that the results of its failure to file a defence in time would result in unnecessary delay, distress, and cost.

 

It seems to me that this behaviour is entirely vexatious and against the Overriding Objectives of the court and since the Defendant was entirely aware of the requirements of the court this application appears to be vexatious.

 

I would therefore ask the court to reject the defendants application, and consider a Civil Restraint Order against him.

 

Yours Sincerly,

 

XXX.

  • Haha 3

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, excellent! Thanks buddy.

 

What are the chances of the court agreeing to this tom?

 

Reasonable. Even if the court ignores it, if the defendant then loses, then they're in deep ... stuff:)

 

if they do it again, after this, they'd probably be found in contempt of court... and have a nice spell inside.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to bother you again tom.

 

Could I mention the fact that it is my very strong beleif, which I have proof of, that it would also be in the public interest for me to gain judgment so that I can follow up a complaint I have with the OFT about this company?

 

It appears the OFT, although interested, are awaiting some solid basis to get involved as there are several claims going in to the courts about the same complaints against this company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to bother you again tom.

 

Could I mention the fact that it is my very strong beleif, which I have proof of, that it would also be in the public interest for me to gain judgment so that I can follow up a complaint I have with the OFT about this company?

 

It appears the OFT, although interested, are awaiting some solid basis to get involved as there are several claims going in to the courts about the same complaints against this company.

 

Frankly, in that case, it might be better to allow the case to go to court, so everything goes on the record.

 

Up to you, of course...

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do. It's a financial company too but I can't obviously go into it much.

 

I imagine I will be able to name and shame in the future if I ever get judgment though? After all, it would only be the truth.

 

 

nice one.

 

remember, the truth cannot be libellous!!

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...