Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chiggers -vs- HSBC


Chiggers
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This could be a very long story, so I've tried to cut it down as much aas possible. I would really appreciate any input or ideas.

 

Took out a student account with HSBC whilst at Uni (9 years ago). Spent much time with bank charges! Then became self employed two years ago, which means salary is staggered, hence resulting in bank charges!

 

1/ In feb 07 I asked HSBC for all statements.

2/ On 1st March 07 I sent request letter to HSBC asking for repayment (with all charges highlighted, interest calculated etc). The amount claimed for totals around £4000.

3/ Response from bank saying they are looking into it.

4/ send second letter, but hear nothing back within 14 days.

5/ Apply for Court Hearing.

6/ Right at the last minute HSBC put in a defence!

7/ The court hearing is now set for 2nd August. The Notice states the following:

"Before the claim is listed for hearing, the judge has ordered that a preliminary hearing should take place to consider whether the claim can be disposed of because the defendant has no real prospect of success at a final hearing"

The General Form of Judegment states "At this hearing the court will consider either to stay the claim pending the decision in a test case, or to give directions for this claim to be heard as a test case".

8/ In the third week of June I send a nudge to the Solicitors (DG).

9/ I eventually hear back with an offer for £1000!! I use details on your forums to send back a letter requesting the full claim plus court costs - totalling £4230. (I can post on all correspondance letters if anyone wants to see them!)

10/ I hear nothing back from the Solicitors (or from Mr Loker, Quality Services Manager at HSBC who I sent a copy of the letter to).

11/ On 16th July I send another nudge letter stating that it would be beneficial to DG to settle out of Court etc (again using details posted on forums) and that I would accept £4230 as full settlement. I sent the letter recorded delivery to DG and Mr Loker. I also emailed DG Solicitors a copy.

 

I have still heard nothing back. I have tried phoning DG but now they have a standard divert on their number, which now asks me to send a letter - doesn't give me the option to leave a voicemail!!

 

I'm thinking of sending them a further nudge by fax on Monday (if I have heard nothing) - what do you think??

 

Plus, is this usual for DG to leave it so late to settle before Court date?? Do you think that I will have to go to Court?? Getting panicky now!!

 

Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I there. I too had a prelim hearing. It was set for 25th July (next Wednesday) I sent a mini court bundle to DG 14 days before the prelim hearing and received a full offer the other day. Here is a link to my thread it may answer a few questions you may have:-

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-fd-hfc-successes/72807-jw-hsbc-new-post.html

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't late - you've got two weeks before the court date!

 

You almost certainly won't end up in court. But if you do, you should resist a stay pending a decision in a test case - it is just more delay and is playing into the hands of HSBC. And you should push for the defence to be struck out as an abuse of process and for lack of prospect of success.

 

You might as well keep nudging DG - just so they know you haven't lost interest. I expect you'll get your offer next week. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input. I've had a look at the mini court bundle on the forum, so I'm going to adapt it to my case over the weekend. I nearly panicked when your reply said it should be before 14 days - that was yesterday!!!!

 

However, the General Form of Judgement states:

 

"4. Not less than 14 days before the preliminary hearing, the Defendant shall file with the Court and serve upon the Claimant details of any cases proceeding as a test case, the decision in which will determine the issues in this claim.

 

5. The Claimant may make any representations to the Court in writing provided these are received by the court and served on the Defendant no less than 5 days before the preliminary hearing."

 

So, if I send my bundle on Monday to the Court and DG, this is 10days before hearing - do you think this will be ok??

 

Also, as we are past the 14 days before hearing, am I correct in thinking that (as I haven't received anything in the post) DG/HSBC can now not send any details of the case to the Court?? What exactly does this mean?

 

With my bundle should I attach the Court Judgement Form, highlighting the sections which states they should have responded 14 days before hearing, and therefore nudge them to settle??

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right that DG should have responded by now. But the judge always has discretion to be flexible with dates like this (although he also has the power to take their non-compliance into account in his judgment/decisions). But certainly mention to DG the fact that they've missed the deadline.

 

What were 1, 2 and 3?

 

Paragraph 5 is basically asking you to tell the judge what you want him to do - so that he can consider it - if you don't tell him what you want, you will only get it if he is a master of guessing. This is where you can ask for the defence to be struck out. But don't forget to send a copy to DG too.

 

Remember also that the hearing in August is not a full hearing - it is just to decide what happens next. Although I am pretty sure you'll get a full offer by then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parts 1,2 and 3 just relate to the date and place of the hearing, and that the claim has been ordered to the small claims track.

 

I'm just printing out my bundle (methinks I'm going to run out of ink though!!), and just noticed that I need to add terms and conditions for the account. Have looked on HSBC's website, but can't seem to find them. Any ideas???

 

Also, when you say the Judge wants me to tell him what to do, what exactly should I put - I mean do I need to provide reference to laws/rules? Presumably I can't write and just say I want HSBC to be struck out!!?? (Sorry for being stupid!!)

 

Thanks for all your help anyways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more thing - can I claim for interest during the 6 months that this dispute has been going on? Can I also claim for expenses due to Court case (eg 1 day's salary, travel expenses) if this case goes that far - or do you think that is pushing it??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looked at your thread Jo - very interesting read. Glad you won! Can't believe it got so close to your prelim hearing - guess that takes a little weight off my mind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Chiggers, this came from a set of directions issued to another member so was writen by a District Judge, should give you some ideas for wording relating to strike outs.

 

The defence be struck out as an abuse of process.

 

If the defendant seeks to set aside the strike out, the Defendant shall, with its application attach a schedule of all the cases where a similar defence has been filed and where they allowed the claim to go to trial and did not settle giving details of the action number, the court and the date of adjudication by the court.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're certainly not being stupid, Chiggers!

 

The thing to remember about all this is that it is YOUR claim. You have issued proceedings in court because you want something done. Up to a point, it will be obvious to the judge what you want, and he is more than capable of sorting it out without asking you which of the tools at his disposal he should use. However, if you ask him to use a certain tool then he is in a position to consider your suggestion - if you don't ask you're less likely to get.

 

You don't necessarily need to quote the exact part of the Civil Procedure Rules you're asking him to apply, but it never hurts if you do. Strike outs are done under Part 3, and should be applied for as soon as possible - and the rules say they prefer you to do it before the case is allocated (to a track) but they can still consider it now - and it can't do any harm.

 

So you might say something like:

 

"It is contended that the defendant has no intention of contesting this case in court, and is using the delays inherent in the court process to put off making the settlement that they will inevitably make. On this basis I respectfully request that the defence case be struck out under Part 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules (specifically, rule 3.4(1)(b)) as an abuse of process."

 

You could (and probably should) include here a list of cases where HSBC have settled out of court - you can get this from the Survey Results link at the top of the page. This will support what you are saying and give the judge more reason to give you your strike out order.

 

On the question of interest, it is good practice to work out what the daily interest on your claim is and state this on your schedule of charges - for the sake of clarity. And yes, you keep applying interest until you get a settlement (because the court would apply interest to the date of judgment if it got that far).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info - still putting my court bundle together!

Where exactly do I get the list of where Hsbc has settled out of court??? I've been to the Survey results link, but can't seem to be able to get onto anything for Hsbc??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help!!!!!!!

 

Does anyone have anything downloadable that I can attach with my letter to the Court - with regards to asking judge to respectfully strike the defence out of court???

 

I wanted to put something along the lines of:

 

The Claimaant respectfully requests that an order may be made as follows:

 

1. That the Defence be struck out as it is an abuse of process, pursuant to rule 3.4 (2)(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules, on the basis that the Defendant has filed a template defence then subsequently settled each and every other claim of this nature.

Since May 2006, I am aware of over 100 clims of this nature in which the Defendant has filed an acknowledgement of service, then a Defence, then has breached the order for pre-hearing directions, then has finally settled without liability shortly in advance of the hearing or trial.

 

 

However, I need to attached smaple list of similar cliams, including their claim numbers, but cannot find anything anywhere!!

 

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the link to settled claims which shows the claim No etc. If when you print it off, enlarge the font size. It should then print off a bit clearer.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=138&Itemid=82

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so so so so much!!! You are an absolute star! I can now send of my bundle to the court with covering letter requesting defence be struck out.Yeah! Perhaps cutting it a little bit fine, but I guess these things were sent to test us!!

 

Hsbc have now phoned 8 times in last 3 days (yes over weekend, at during evening) requesting I pay overdraft off!! I seriously hate them, and will not stop until I win!!!

 

(Want to say a very rude word but shall refrain!!)

 

Thanks everyone for their help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they call again DO NOT go through the security bit. Tell them that if they wish to talk to you, to put it in writing.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...