Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Duffers mum v Sainsburys Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi duffers mum

 

may i ask how old the sainsburys is

 

ive been trying to find one from 2005

 

barmy, orrible and stupid sent one to a pal of mine,

 

ime sure they made up the agreement and i need to find one to compare

 

any takers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 561
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The account is from 2002 and i've been backwards and forwards with Sainsburys for a few years now, they've obvioulsy had enough and flogged it off to Crapot, who've sent me a reconstructed agreement, unfortunately i didn't follow the advice from this site and carried on making payments to Sainburys so i've got 6 years till its SB :( plenty of time for Crapot to play silly games. I just ignored Barmy Orrible and Stupid when they wrote to me, kept receiving the same old letters every 3 months. The document Crapot have sent me is a load of rubbish but they insist its a true copy...guess it will be up to the court to decide if they go down the road, but I'm quietly confident :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick update..sent a letter off to Crapot before I went away advising them they have not provided the information I requested, returned from holiday today to find another threat-o-gram, saying the full balance is now due (they have whacked on another load of interest) I guess that means the agreement has definately been terminated now? I have no intention of responding anymore to them, they can't provide what i have requested so I guess I'll have to wait and see now if they take me to court :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received another letter from Crapot telling me the that case laws shows a true copy does not mean an exact copy :?: they also state they have requested Sainsburys provide a copy of the signed credit agreement, be interesting to see if Sainsburys can do this as they only ever provided an application form to me and no T&C's relevat to the date of the account! They also say that the purpose of the CCA is for consumer protection not the avoidance of debt which they believe I am attempting in this matter! Hilarious....and if I intend to challenge the enforcability of the credit agreement I must apply to the court to obtain a declaration of unenforceability...where do they get this rubbish from? I know its up to them to prove they can collect on an alleged debt and at the moment what they have provided me with would not allow that...I have to contact them otherewise my account will be escalated...plus the balance has increased again....think I might send them a little reply....just so they know that I know they are talking rubbish..again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

declaration of? :lol: That is certainly one for the ' best outlandish comment from an DCA* what utter tripe, I hope you've kept a copy of the letter?

 

So, you've got to go to court to prove that the debt cannot be collected? :lol: ummm, they want the money, surely it's for them to prove that it is enforceable

but then again they would know this and of course you're now defending a claim? hahah! ridiculous.

 

Personally I wouldn't send them anything further, it's what they want you to do, keep the contact going etc....escalate an unenforceable debt? How are they

going to do that?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I typed out a letter all ready to send and then thought...nawww can't be bothered communicating with them any more, they get on my pip! I certainly have kept the letter they sent me, along with all the other ones....I'll wait and see what Sainsbury's provide them with...they originally got the reconstructed CCA from Sainsburys because its the same as what Sainsburys sent me, although previously Sainsburys had sent a copy of the original application form, I do of course still have the dodgy DN's etc to fall back on, if needs must. I find it amusing that they say if I don't contact them they will escalate up the collections ladder, the account was in dispute with Sainsbury's so shouldn't have been sold in the first place, no CCA, dodgy DN's and other things, but still they threaten court action and CCJ...unbelievable really! I'll keep the thread updated as and when I hear anything else!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just checked my credit file and see that Crapot have added more interest. How on earth they can do this when the only provided me with a reconstructed agreement is making me really cross. They cannot prove my original agreement stated they could add interest/charges after default because they cannot provide a copy of that agreement. Surely they can't get away with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they can add what they like..however enforcing payment of what they are adding to the account is a different kettle of fish...they even added to my account when i was paying them..would have paid forever in that case...stopped payment cca etc in end told em to sling their hook or take me to court and explain their actions in a court of law..they declined

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The last I heard from Crapot was last year, when they said they would contact Sainsburys for a copy of my CCA (which Sainsburys could never provide when I asked for it), all they have provided so far is a reconstructed cca which bears no resemblence to anything I would have signed...However they are still adding interest and the balance is increasing by quite a lot each month. Should I continue to ignore them and let them add the interest or should I contact them and tell them, once again that they should not be adding interest when they don't have an agreement which says they can|? There is about another 3 years before the default falls off my credit file, but over 5 years until it becomes statute barred because I was paying Sainsbury's a nominal amount...am getting quite worried about the increasing balance...my previous dealings with DCA's has never encountered any interest being added...advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Crapot are still adding interest to my account, despite being unable to provide a copy of the CCA (other the reconstructed rubbish the provided last year), the balance has increased by almost £1,000 since they took the account over last year. I'm starting to get mighty fed up with it now...i've heard nothing from them for months and months, the last being they would contact the original company for a copy of the CCA, I don't want to contact them for fear they will start harrassing me all over again, but then again I don't see why they should be charging interest on something they can't prove is owing. Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep as above ignore em..as i said they can add what they like..so what?? until they are prepared to put it before a court and then explain their actions i wouldnt even bother contacting them..if they are leaving you alone as it goes let sleeping dogs lie...unless your original agreement allowed them to add to the account then dont worry bout it....no cca no agreement this is never ever going to see inside a court room

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they can't prove whether the original agreement allowed for interest to be added or not, because they can't provide the CCA! I know I shouldn't worry about it, but when I see the balance increasing I can't help it. This is the last one really to be causing me any problems M&S have just accepted a F&F of 30%, 1st Cretins haven't been in touch since I got their SD set aside with costs awarded in 2008, and another vanished off my credit file months ago, don't know where it went, but wont' worry about it, until it reappears!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can spend your time worrying bout it...but there is really not a lot of point....either they come up with the cca initiate court action, or they can add what they like till kingdom come....its not worth losing sleep over them honest....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Just before Christmas and out come the leeches! Received a letter with what Crapot say is the CCA, its what Sainsbury's originally sent me, no T&C's which of course should be included as should all the variants of the T&C's. I'm aware that things have changed now regarding CCA's, but my position has also changed and I'm now in the ranks of the great unemployed. The balance has increased on this account due to Crapots charges. I can offer them something as a F&F and I am inclined to do this because I just want to get shot of it now..the only other thing I can offer is £1 a month because i'm on JSA. If this went to court and I'm on benefits what would be the likely outcome?

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would not even think of offering any F&F until they comply with your s 78 request. They will just smell blood and pester you more.

 

What charges have they added? They can’t add anything if there’s no T&Cs to say they can. Idiots.

 

Have a read up of Carey v HSBC to determine what they have to supply –*it’s not ALL variants of T&Cs, just those applicable when the account was opened and those applicable when it was terminated. If they are recons, they MUST have your name and address on there, EXACTLY as they were when you took out the alleged agreement and also those in force when (if?) the account was terminated.

 

They cannot enforce while they remain in breach of a valid s 78 request – Phoenix Recoveries v Devendra Kotecha [2011] refers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent off my F&F offer to them now, but have stated I know they have not complied fully with my request. I really just want to be shot of it. If they don't accept then they will not get a penny, simples! They will have to take me to court and with no job, no income (bar the JSA which i'll only get for 6 months) i don't fancy their chances much **waves at guests** . I don't want to get involved in letter ping pong..i've moved on a lot with my life and have a good credit file now (bar the defaults which will drop off shortly), really don't want to risk a CCJ messing everything up again.

 

If it went to court..where would it stand with the dodgy Default Notices? Could it get chucked out for that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have added almost £1,000 of charges, despite my sending letters saying you don't have the CCA to prove you can do this...they just said the original agreement I signed would have allowed for this..yes I know...the very documnet they couldn't provide..hey ho...they are a bunch of ******** aren't they!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

They did send me the T&C's under seperate cover, but they are not contained within one document, although I don't think that makes any difference now..think i'm stuffed on this one, they turned down my F&F advising they would accept a figure in excess of 7 times the amount I offered, I could barely get the amount together that I offered, so no chance of anything higher, i'm unemployed, with a disability and little chance of finding a job..my JSA will expire in April and then i'll get nothing as DH will be expected to keep me (but not liable for my debts thankfully!) Meanwhile this bunch of leeches continue to add interest of almost £100 per month..dread to think what the outstanding balance will be by the time it goes to court (which i'm pretty sure it will do now). Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...