Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds make offer then dont pay?`


tlrose
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have been claiming £130 from Lloyds. On the 3rd July they wrote to me telling me that they were going to pay me £750 as full and final settlement to my claim and it would be credited to my account within ten working days. Ten working days would have been Tuesday just gone.

 

It hasnt been credited and I cannot contact them. The telephone number for the service recovery centre in Andover is constantly busy and thier message service doesnt work.

 

It all seems a little strange to me. Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats right. Thats why I find it so strange that they offered to settle for £750. I didnt question it at the time because I just that if they wanted to pay that much its up to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have sent a standard letter and have made an offer do they have to honour it?

 

Where does that leave my claim? Will they then just credit the £130 or will I have to continue to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly the same has happened to me. I claimed for two separate charges in two separate accounts. I got the letters and one charge was paid immediately the other has gone well past the 10 days and still hasn't been paid. The charges were for less than your's - still waiting for £240.

 

I couldn't get through to them either. Tried the usual Lloyds number as well and they said it's a major problem no one can get through to Debt recovery and there is 'no other number'. Total shambles. I've had to write another complaint letter and now wait another 28 days for a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect as you probably do that they've sent you a standard letter and have now realised their mistake. You could fax them to see what's going on.

 

Or wait and see what someone else in the know here thinks. I'm not sure how things stand seeing as they have made you an offer and you have agreed to it :confused:

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't get through to them at all. It's engaged all the time (purposely I guessed) and the facility they have to leave a message doesn't work.

 

Don't bother with the fax - I sent two and they ignored both. I'm so mad at them for offering the payment and then not honoring it. They are unbelieveable!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The number rings through to an automated service. Then tells you that all lines busy and asks you to leave a message. After the message has been left it says that the message box is full and the message cannot be stored.

 

If they're sloppiness means they have to pay over the odds then so be it. They've been ripping people off for years.

 

Would a court uphold the offer? Or could Lloyds claim some kind of pitiful defence.

 

Thanks for all your help on this everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as im aware they are under no obligation to honour the offer. It would also be apparent that you cannot use the offer in any court proceedings. Its just a simple mistake they make due to sending out standard letters.

 

I would say they will pay up your claim in full but no more, maybe within 3 weeks, thats the kind of timescales im hearing as they have also agreed to repay mine.

 

Added - Rumour has it they may be making a batch of settlements tomorrow, dont quote me on that though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 5 weeks now since we got the letter and they haven't paid or acknowledged anything. So now I'm having to go through it again for the final half - court proceeding will have to start even though I got a full offer. I just can't understand why they'd offer then not see it through. It wasn't even the standard £750 letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a chase along with a copy of their offer. Id be quite stern and say failure to pay up within 14 days will now result in me taking you to court, this will then add fees on to the amount owed.

 

That should get them moving, remember always chase them up as they have probably got thousands of them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

i couldnt get through either so i phoned the head office number and told them about the telephone system at andover not working, they sent them an email for me with my ref no asking them whats going on with my claim and thats when i recieved the standard letter of 750 quid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...