Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • One of the things that we will need to discover through a statutory subject access request is how they verified the identity of this mystery person. Presumably that person couldn't actually give any ID so does that mean that the inspectors simply took her word for it? It will be useful to know the answers to these questions because all of these companies have duties to process your personal data accurately. If they failed to do that then they could be liable to you for the distress caused as well as any other damage. I'm just trying to envisage a scenario where a ticket inspector stops a young woman who then says that she's been travelling without a ticket. The inspector asks her her name and address and she gives the false name and address. The inspector then asks her to verify this by identification. The woman then says that she is not carrying anything with her. What happens at that point? How does it work? Does the inspector then have to take your word for it and warn her that she will be contacted with a possible sanction? If that's as far as it goes, then it seems a bit ridiculous to me that you stop somebody for travelling without a ticket – evident dishonesty. Then they give the controller their name and address which can't be verified and so the controller has to accept that and on that basis a procedure is started against the named person on the basis that the contact details which were given at the time must be true – even though that person has already demonstrated their dishonesty by travelling without a ticket. Or, are we going to find – if there is a statutory disclosure, that this person is travelling around with some documentation which identifies her as you, your husband or one of your two daughters? Which of course would be very much more serious. This is why we want a list of the rail companies – as much information as possible so that we can start forcing them to disclose information about how this all occurred. I will also be interested in sending an SAR to action fraud to see what they have done with your allegation which you made some time ago and about which you never heard anything further.
    • Evening all,   Right, just spoke to my SIL at length.....................   In response to Andy's question regarding T's & C's, that answer remains the same. The staff MORE cards and general public's cards both had the same T's & C's.   As for when he started the unofficial swiping practice, his best guesstimate is around September 2015.   Another development during our conversation, I asked him if he ever asked customers for their permission to swipe his card to claim their unclaimed points. He said he never actually asked but some regulars would forget their cards sometimes and tell him to take the points. Also, Stonegate would sometimes have promotions like half price food and drinks etc. However to claim the offer you had to have a MORE card. Again, if regulars had forgotten their MORE card he would use his for them to get the offers. I know this doesn't help his cause but in case its relevant I thought I'd offer it up.   I have impressed upon him the urgency of this now so if any more info is required just ask and I will get it.   Cheers
    • The company is called Robinson Way, it was a Barclaycard credit card.   I  moved about 12 months after Barclaycard stopped replying to my letters (re the charges, 2013) - so I did not tell them about my moving, but at the time of the original debt I was living back with my folks; so this most recent letter was sent to there, and my folks forwarded it to me - and likewise, if they had sent me anything in the interim it would have been forwarded to me.
    • I do agree with you.How sad I am right now . I wish I could go back. Mg7  
    • No way I will be doing this again. The way I’m feeling now. stealing doesn’t pay what I’m going through right now , it’s really hard. I wish I could have learned the first time. thank you for your help.   mg7  
  • Our picks

Fealkat V Abbey - Judgement what happens next?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4853 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi All, After my success with LLoyds, I'm now helping out a friend with her battle against Abbey - bring it on!!

 

I followed all the steps detailed here and following the bog standard replies, started a claim with MCOL on the 18/06/07.

 

Having not received any communication or defence from them I entered a Judgement of default on the 11/07/07. I still haven't received anything from them and have phoned the court who have told me that I can start the warrant procedure whithin a reasonable time.

 

I've read and re-read the forums and it appears that usually Abbey DO enter a defence at some point so I'm confused not to have heard anything.

 

Would someone mind advising me on how long I should wait before executing the warrant or what my next step should be?

 

Many thanks in advance for any help which will be gratefully received!!

 

Feralkat :)

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest louis wu

I think the thing to do is to call the court, and ask them what the judge would consider a 'reasonable time frame'. Explain that you are not a solicitor, but believe Abbey are abusing their position and wasting yours, and the courts time.

 

See what the say, but I suspect that the judge will give them at least a fortnight to comply.

 

Keep us informed

 

louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Louis - I thought that 14 days would be fair and the lady I spoke to at the court thought that it sounded OK.

 

I guess I'll take the next step on the 15th July - a week today.

 

Does anyone know if many other people have won in this fashion?

 

Many thanks

 

Feralkat

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Feralkat

 

There is a good chance that Abbey will ask for the judgement to be set aside once they receive your warrant of execution. Do a search for threads by Elisedriver as she had this happen to her, as did NatalieC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the buggers keep denying receiving any paperwork, its absolutely staggering the amount of paperwork that seems to get lost on its way to them

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll look those two up - thanks!!

 

How can they lose post that is sent recorded delivery?!! You'd think they would come up with something better - the dog/hamster/baby ate it or something!! They've had plenty of practise now :D

 

Thanks for your advice guys!

 

Feralkat

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again!!

 

Well I still haven't heard a peep from Abbey - I find it completly staggering that they have not responded at all!!

 

The address that I used with MCOL (and all previous letters) was the local branch address, they replied to the first letters that I sent there (the usual 'Sorry you're not happy letters') but have ignored anything from the courts :???:

 

Do you think that I should now start the warrant procedure? They have had over 2 weeks since the judgement so they have had plenty of time.

 

Should I amend the address with the MCOL to a central office, could that be the problem? I think that if they have replied from the branch address before there is no reason why they can't reply from there now?

 

Any thoughts gratefully received - please!!

 

FeralKat

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Feralkat, ring MCOL, there should be a form that you fill in to file for judgement (have you already done this?) if you have done this it is time to send the Baliffs in, again MCOL and tell that that you want to do this, it costs about £50? but this is recoverable

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done the judgement - will execute the warrent now. I'm hoping that the 'test case' won't affect this because Abbey have not replied I'm hoping that they cant apply for a stay on the basis of the test case?

 

What do you think?

 

Many thanks for your reply

 

Feralkat

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in all honesty, they might apply for a stay anyway. But you might as well go for it anyway, they might just cough up, oh and if the baliffs are going in, take your camcorder lol and perhaps the local press might be interested, see Rekas thread :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't that just be LOVELY - I'd invite everyone from here and we could all go and laugh at them!!

 

Will execute the warrant and then let you know how I get on :)

 

Many thanks

 

Feralkat

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallo All,

 

Well, I have today issued the warrant - I'm guessing (from what I have read in other threads) that Abbey will now apply for a stay?

 

If they do not do that, does anyone know what is likely to happen next?

 

Does anyone have any ideas on how the test case might affect the claim at this stage?

 

Many many thanks for any help :D

 

Feralkat

:)Lloyds ***WON*** £3,500 :)
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...