Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

nationwide abuse of credit referencing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hya this is my first post so forgive me if ive posted it in the wrong place. I need help as Last Tuesday i went to Nationwide to apply for the Basic Flex account. Now all sounds very straight forward as there is not a credit application right. Well NO, they told me that i was not entitled to this account as i have had a previous account before, they said the basic flex account is only for people who have never had a bank account not for people with bad credit. So assuming they must be right i was like OK. They then told me they have to run a credit check. I informed them that i didnt want any credit facilities as i have bad credit, so i didnt want a rejection for credit on my file. They told me i cannot get a bank account without being credit scored. So i went along with it, not realising they were trying to give me credit. The system refused (as it would as i have Bad credit) so they said it goes to head office for a decision and i should find out within five days whether or not they can give me an account. After leaving i was very confused and didnt really understand what they were saying. Then today i recieved a letter telling me that i have been refused for a bank accouint with information about why i would be refused credit. The thing is the lady told me i would get a cash card account only before i left the branch ( which i already knew). So why was i refused for credit when i didnt apply for it. Are they allowed to make an application of credit without my permission? also who is the basic flex account for because i thought it was for people with bad credit? Also with the basic flex account is there supposed to be a credit scoring? Does anyone know what i should do about this?

Please tell me if i am wrong about them doing something wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Basic Flex account is not as such designed for people with bad credt it is only designed for people that dont want any facilities with there account such as over draft and cheque book etc the account still lets you have DD and SO set up on the account it is basically a pay in take out account, you cant buy things on card etc, i used to have this account with Nationwide and i wanted to upgrade it as i'd had it since i was 16 and couldn't do anything with it, they said i would have to close this account and open a new one which i thought was fine but in did an application which they did a credit check on and i got declined even though i have a clear credit file, i think the way banks now open accounts they have to for some strange reason do credit checks on you which is rubbish because if you have a basic account like Nationwides where you cant go overdrawn, cant pay by card and cant write cheques why do a credit check, it is totally pathetic and i share your frustration its a bank account not a bl**dy credit card/loan, you used to be able to get a bank account anywhere but now days you cant.

 

You do have the right to appeal against the decision and they could change there mind, my partner and i have just appealed to Halifax as they 2 turned us to down despite being a customer for 6 years to upgrade our account.

 

Needless to say i am no longer with Nationwide and stung them for £2000 worth of bank charges which i won!

Nationwide Won - £2000 :D

Barclay Card - Hearing Date 14/08/07 :???:

Capital One - N1 Filed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the information you provided i found it very useful. What i dont understand is why i wasnt allowed to apply for the Basic account when i specifically stated that i wanted no credit facilities what so ever i just wanted an account where my money can go in and i can only take it out. I have also just checked their terms and conditions and they state that you are not allowed this account if you are a holder of another account elswhere, i didnt think this was correct? sure i have been told you are not required to declare any accounts with other banks. Any more info on this?

Also are they allowed to try and see if im eligible for credit with them even though i told them i didnt want it. Also does that mean they made me apply for this account by deception?

Anyone who has any more info on this it would be gratefully recieved as im not use to dealing with banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see your point and im under the same impression as you i thought that you could have as many basic or any bank accounts as you liked didnt know if you already had a basic account that you couldn't have another one anyway how the hell would they know if you had one elsewhere as you said you dont have to declare it, i would say that you have been made to apply for this under deception, i used to work for a bank so i know that the workers get comission when people apply for accounts but not on basic accounts only one with credit facilities! Last year i wanted to open a savings account with HSBC bearing in mind this is an account that i would only be paying money in each month didnt have any access to it what so ever and they credit checked me for this a savings account i went mental as they didnt get my permission to do this.....i would suggest you definately appeal this with all the points you mention and as they never told you that you would be credit checked or that you feel you have been decived get them to remove the search from your credit file, i would do this all in writing so you have a copy, i have had searched removed from my file by contacting Experian and querying it!

 

Anyone else that can give anymore info would be great!

Nationwide Won - £2000 :D

Barclay Card - Hearing Date 14/08/07 :???:

Capital One - N1 Filed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to point out where you say "I didn’t want a rejection for credit on my file", if you mean your credit file held with the credit agency's, no record is made of the success or failure of any particular search. All that is recorded is that a search by nationwide (or whoever) was carried out, not the outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Planner thanks for your info, however if a search has been put on your credit file and no account is added afterwards then wouldnt anyone be able to see that i had failed the credit check? and besides all information warns you that too many searches adversally affects your file. were they allowed to apply for credit without my consent???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all. If your renting a place, a credit reference agency might do a search and yet no account would appear afterwards.

 

You might go for a mortgage, they would credit check you, you could be approved for it and then the sale falls through and you dont buy the house so no account appears.

 

A search appearing is no indication what so ever of the likley result of that search.

 

Best of luck getting that account!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite right Planner. I know from experience that when a credit search is done on your file it impacts on your overall score successful or not. This is kept on file for 12 months from the date of search then falls off. I had a similar thing with RBS where i actually told them not to do a search and was assured that a basic account doesn't have a search. When he punched it into the computer it made the search anyway.

I can see the point of doing searches on credit applications but why don't they do an unrecorded search for none credit applications that way it doesn't impact your score yet still gives them the info they need, they claim its only to check your identity and length of time at your current address so it shouldn't be a problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Expressit

There are two types of searches recorded, the one for basic accounts, identity checks etc. is normally not seen by anyone else who does a search in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks royboy68 i thought so. Would i be within my right to ask them to remove it off my file as i thought it was illegal for companies to run credit applications without my consent. as i was told it was still gonna be a cash card only account. Yet from the letter they sent me it was a rejection for an account with credit facilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told some time ago that Banks/Building Societies do run credit checks on new customers, sorry cannot remember exactly why though. I think it is something to do with money laundering legislation, ie they need to make sure you are not going to be using them to money launder.

 

Equifax searches remain for 6 months, Experian 12 months, debt searches with Experian remain for 6 years for some strange reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Skintbag

I put an official complaint into the RBS stating that as far as i was concerned they had broken the law by accessing my credit file without my consent and even worse with my explicit forbidance. After a lengthy investigation they agreed to remove it. Saying that, i never checked back to see if they actually did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought they done credit check just to confirm that there is no frauds or bankcruptcy on file . That's what I was told when I applied for an account with the co-op. Said i Just want basic account( to hide money from OH as he spends too much! lol) and they sent me an account with an electron card whic I am not fussed about as my current bank accounts alreay have the electron. When I go into the BOS for naything they always try and an want me to upgrade my account and I am sick of the telling no as i like to be able to spend the money that's in the bank and not get it on credit.

Skint - try applying for the co-op basic account. My local branch is 50 miles away but can use all facilites for it at my local post office so doesn't make any difference.

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you submit an application there are 2 reasons banks & lenders check your credit files.

 

The first is to make sure you are who you say you are. (To deter ID theft)

 

The second is to help them assess you, to see if you're capable of operating your account in a sensible manner. (To deter fraud and assess risk).

 

Every set of Terms & Conditions I've ever read, states that they may or will carryout a check on your credit file and or share data with other agencies.

 

The system I use to deter ID Theft and protect myself ( see Identity Theft protection, ID fraud prevention tips, Impersonation fraud assistance) now forces ALL lenders to check applicants credit files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand all of that, obviously for fraud but i didnt think they were allowed to apply for an account with credit unless i say thats what i want. Thwe letter they sent me states that the credit account i applied for i was declined but the point is i didnt apply for a account with credit. also they misinformed me that i was not allowed there basic account, which is on the CAB website that i am allowed to apply fo r that one:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...