Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Defence stands struck out and court vacated.**WON**


gab55
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have received a letter today from my local court to say that: LLOYDS FAILED TO FILE ANS SERVE DOCUMENTS, PURSUANT TO THE ORDER OF THE 21/5 AND THE 26/6 AND THE DEFENCE STANDS STRUCK OUT AND THE COURT VACATED AND FULL PAYMENT DUE FORTHWITH TO THE CLAIMANT.

 

Has this happened to anyone else, when is payment likely as forthwith means immediate! do i need to chase [problem] or leave it to the courts.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is common.

 

Without any background, to clarify, does the court document say Judgement for Claimant (usually at the top)?

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry being really thick here, i have just found another letter that reads:

The defence be struck out without further order and judgment shall be entered for the claimant.

I have spoken to the court and they say i need do nothing and to contact them if they do not pay?

 

So i take it taht means they are entering the judgement on my behalf and i just sit and wait for payment?

 

Is taht right, i have read your thread but not sure if i need to go down those lines.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court staff, they mean well, but frequently misinform.

 

You say entering judgement, but you have this already.

 

Yes you can do nothing and wait and they may well pay in any event, but I would keep the pressure up as my post 4 above.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have received a letter today from my local court to say that: LLOYDS FAILED TO FILE ANS SERVE DOCUMENTS, PURSUANT TO THE ORDER OF THE 21/5 AND THE 26/6 AND THE DEFENCE STANDS STRUCK OUT AND THE COURT VACATED AND FULL PAYMENT DUE FORTHWITH TO THE CLAIMANT.

 

Has this happened to anyone else, when is payment likely as forthwith means immediate! do i need to chase [problem] or leave it to the courts.

 

Thanks

What order did they not comply with, just out of interest? And which court?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back?! Where did I go?:confused:

 

I'm always here, me. Just sometimes you don't see me!!:o :D

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn. Busted again! I forgot you super-dupers were all seeing!:D

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

Money in the bank today,

Amount claimed 2700.00

Amount received 2700.00.

This is also my second win as i won on account 1 in may for 2200.00,

4700.00 better off hopefully now we can get sorted and restore some normality to the finances.

Thanks to all who helped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rec'd your bundle docs, for which my thanks. Sori if I should not be posting on here, but all this computer stuff fazes me! Couldnt open the image tho, wonder if thats my ancient machine, or just me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rec'd your bundle docs, for which my thanks. Sori if I should not be posting on here, but all this computer stuff fazes me! Couldnt open the image tho, wonder if thats my ancient machine, or just me.

 

Sori folks, posted on wrong thread. Am looking to respond to Guido T. Blasted computers, hate 'em!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...