Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

REALLY high bank fees!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6108 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last year I tried to access funds held by my local Halifax...some £8,000.00 had been deposited into my account to consolidate other debts and was cleared yet the Halifax refused to allow me to even touch a couple of hundred pounds when I tried to pay bills via telephone banking, something I had done many times before. So I went into my local branch to get to the bottom of the situation. Shortly after my arrival I was again refused access to my account, had my card confiscated, the account was closed on the spot and I accused of theft by the assistant manager. I promptly called the Police but the Halifax staff intercepted the Police before they got to me and without even listening to me, the Police beat me almost unconscious in the Assistant Managers office, then asked me who I was and arrested me for complaining that I wanted to access my money. Later, two of the seven Police in attendance charged ME with assault among other ludicrous and entirely false allegations. That goes to court this month, but then it is my turn. I have received harassment and threats almost every day of my recovery, my medical records have been mixed in with those of someone else, the Halifax are refusing to release CCTV footage on the grounds that footage may incriminate Police and staff but if the Police officer in charge of the case wishes to request the footage they can release it to him...that officer inflicted brain injuries on me in the bank, so it is unlikely that he will request that footage.

 

To add further insult to injury, the Halifax are demanding I pay them over £90.00 for a transaction which they allege took place some five months or so AFTER the account was closed and foreclosed on a loan of some £5,000.00. This will effectively bankrupt me.

 

I suspect this is a rather unusual set of circumstances, I also suspect that many will think my story dubious, however I have no reason to lie and do you really think someone could concoct such an elaborate story? I am more than happy to speak with any members of the press and media about this and would be delighted to hear from any members of the legal fraternity who might be interested in taking on such a bizzare case with a view to helping me prosecute. I am in Dorset by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, please, are you for real or just joking?if you are serious, i apologise.i have nothing constructive to offer.i am so sorry.i simply want to *bump* this up for people to help.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]if my response has been of help to you, please click on my scales. thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be sceptical but you must admit this is some story.

Are you demanding some sort of internal police inquiry then.

 

BTW I was happy to see Halifax have reinstated your account theneven after all the bedlam that you say took place in the managers office.

 

to be 100% honest I would never step foot in a branch that had mistreated and abused me in the way you claim to have been treated.

Are you very brave.

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Overflow,

 

It's ok, I expect most people to be sceptical it is as you say, some story. I am hoping to prosecute the Police involved as normal citizens, then on to the IPCC. The IPCC refused to hear my complaint before the Police have me in court...the IPCC say this because it may reflect unfavourably on the officers involved.

 

The thing with the Halifax re-instating my account is that they didn't even bother to ask me if I would like an account with them...they seem to have simply gone ahead, opened one for me, withdrawn £90.00 and are trying to stiff me for it! They did after all close the account in October 2006...I even have the date, name of the employee, time of closure and branch it was closed at.

 

It is extremely unlikely that I will ever enter another Halifax Branch...As far as I am concerned I have no bank account with the Halifax and that is that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Try the CAB - we are NOT proffesionals here, this is a self help forum!

 

They ignored everything from the CAB...They have ignored everything from the Ombudsman...My only alternative beyond this is to help myself to the branch in a way as legal and as "hands on" as they have been with me. This has literally driven me to the point of no longer caring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glen

I have one question for you ,

WHY havent you seen a good lawyer over this ?

I dont mean to sound negative about your troubles but you must admit this sounds like a horror story.

I appologise if I seem like a doubting Thomas , but if you are genuine then I really really feel for you.

You must pursue this further,and perhaps seek help of councelor as well.

Wish I could help more. Take care x

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have a lawyer, however he is unable to do anything at the moment as the police involved have me up on trumped up charges on this situation. So until they have finished their prosecution of me I am unable to begin mine of them. When the police involved are bent, who do you call? Like I said, I have tried the CAB and the Ombudsman as well as writing to the Halifax myself. The Halifax Bank has simply ignored ALL parties. Even my medical records were tampered with on this...I was horrified to see my medical records which were sent to my solicitor had someone elses medical records and my medication had been incorrectly listed.

 

This can ALL be easily verified by members of the press if interested. I assure you I am not paranoid, this is not a fabricated story at all. This incident is testing the edge of sanity though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glen

 

Im not doubting you really Im not.

 

I just wish there was something I could do to help.

 

Thinking about it you'd need a really good memory and a fantastic imagination to make up a story like this.

 

I suppose your Lawyer has approached the GMC to report the way they have messed about with your records.

 

I went through a court case with alocal Hospital when my late husband passed away (wont go into details).

 

The GMC were very helpful and launched an investigation into it,which quite suprised me cause normally they all tend to stick together when something like this happens.

 

Although I cant offer any constructive help if ever you need to let off steam or just want to talk you can always PM me.

 

Sometimes just talking things through helps ease the pain and the stress which you are going through.

Please try not to get too down . I hope it will all come right in the end.

 

My very best wishes are with you.

 

Regards :)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a terrible situation. Hopefully after the court case, when all the CCTV and evidence are put forward, you can resolve this matter and proceed with your complaints.

 

I wish you the best of luck- fighting against the system is always difficult.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...