Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is My Agreement Enforceable - Useful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Reader & mightyacorn - if they are both MBNA agreements, you may be better starting a new thread in the MBNA forum where you will receive more specific advice. This is such a large thread your enquiries stand the chance of getting lost, also MBNA seem to have their own peculiar way of doing things :rolleyes:

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have several accounts in dispute. I got a letter today from my OC which waffles on about the copies they've send in the past. Curiously, they also state that they have sent a copy of the terms ' both current and historic'. Are they implying that current PTs can be applied retroactively? Thing agreement is pre 2004 and a dud, anyway, but are they chancing their arm by saying this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have several accounts in dispute. I got a letter today from my OC which waffles on about the copies they've send in the past. Curiously, they also state that they have sent a copy of the terms ' both current and historic'. Are they implying that current PTs can be applied retroactively? Thing agreement is pre 2004 and a dud, anyway, but are they chancing their arm by saying this?

 

what they are saying is that there is a clause in the original T & C's which allows them to change the T & C's anytime they like

 

i have always thought this to be a grossly unfair contractual term and even more so now that the EU have brought out a new dictat on unfair terms and i hope soon that someone will test it out

 

as things stand now the creditor could give you 30 days notice that the minimum payment is 25% of the balance

 

change a term so that you have to pay in person at a branch standing on one leg whistling god save the queen

Link to post
Share on other sites

do u need to be hopping when u whistle whilest on one leg?

What if u cant whistle?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

of course i did0- also noticed she is in Norfolk so she must be a bootiful Bird!

 

 

I applied for a bernard matthews Job was over qualified.

 

Oh says yes i am a bootiful bird.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know i am from norfolk born and breed as they say.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol

 

born norwich dragged up norwich now in great yarmouth.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what they are saying is that there is a clause in the original T & C's which allows them to change the T & C's anytime they like

 

i have always thought this to be a grossly unfair contractual term and even more so now that the EU have brought out a new dictat on unfair terms and i hope soon that someone will test it out

 

as things stand now the creditor could give you 30 days notice that the minimum payment is 25% of the balance

 

change a term so that you have to pay in person at a branch standing on one leg whistling god save the queen

 

I won't put up with that - no way! What you've said was exactly what I was thinking. The account I was referring to is definitely unenforceable but I get the impression that the bank is trying anything to get the repayments started again and I do expect this (and my other 'in dispute' accounts) to go to court at some point; I can't see them giving up. What I am now concerned about is the possibilty of the goal posts being moved, as it were, for I am sure that is what the bank troll was hinting at in his recent letter.

Edited by FlyboyAgain
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

what they are saying is that there is a clause in the original T & C's which allows them to change the T & C's anytime they like

 

 

I can undersatnd a company changing its T&Cs, but there is no way that they can expect these changes to applied retroactively!! Or am I wrong? If I am, we all may as well give up now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caggers

 

Could you please give your opinions in regards to the agreement below. The prescribed terms are incorrect in that the payment schedule does not agree with the stated APR. It took me a mammoth amount of time to actually work out the figures but I need make sure what I am saying is correct.

 

Here's an extract from my skeleton argument in regards to this;

 

.....5.The written agreement the claimant cities in the Particulars of Claim do not comply with section 61 of the consumer credit act 1974 which states that for an agreement to be compliant with the regulations it must embody within the agreement, the prescribed terms laid out in the S11983/1553. Without the prescribed terms the agreement does not conform to section 60(1) CCA 1974 and therefore cannot be properly executed as described in section 61(1) CCA 1974.

6. The purported agreement is flawed in that the payment schedule does not correspond with the stated APR. The agreement states;

The amount of credit is stated as being “12,812.00” the stated APR is stated as being “32.6%”

The interest charged on the amount of credit is therefore £4,176.712

The first payment being on the collection of the goods i.e. “On the Date of this Agreement” is stated as £3,408.00

It then states 47 payments of £447.88, which amounts to a total of £21,050.36

Now this would bring the total amount payable to £28,635.072, which is not correct as the agreement states the total amount payable as being £24,458.36

 

7. The agreement refers to a first instalment of £3408, which includes the documentation fee of £225, the first payment being on collection of goods. This is incorrect as the repayments should be repaying the loan and the deposit paid should not be stated as being part of the loan.

 

As the documentation fee is included within the first payment and is therefore being treated as credit and not within the ‘Total Charge for Credit”. The agreement therefore fails to give regard to s9(4) of the CCA 1974 which provides that;

 

"an item entering into the total charge for credit shall not be treated as credit even though time is allowed for its payment".

 

The agreement was therefore not properly executed, and should be deemed unenforceable since it fails to contain the "prescribed terms" namely that it does not correctly stipulate a payment schedule that agrees with the stated APR.

The prescribed terms are outlined in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) inter alia: -....

 

Here is the said agreement;

 

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7063/xagreementpg1.jpg

 

Here is a link to my thread incase your interested in the full story

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/189249-notice-return-goods-court.html

 

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Caggers

 

Could you please give your opinions in regards to the agreement below. The prescribed terms are incorrect in that the payment schedule does not agree with the stated APR. It took me a mammoth amount of time to actually work out the figures but I need make sure what I am saying is correct.

 

Here's an extract from my skeleton argument in regards to this;

 

 

 

Here is the said agreement;

 

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7063/xagreementpg1.jpg

 

Here is a link to my thread incase your interested in the full story

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/189249-notice-return-goods-court.html

 

 

Thanks in advance

 

i'm no expert BUt i think you should also feature on the "documention

 

i think you will find that the courts would say that the inclusion of this for interest charges would make the documentation fee exhorbitantly expensive and as a one off fee should not have been subject to you paying interest on it over 47 months at 32%

 

if this is the case then it makes the whole agreement unenforceable

 

i would suggst and accountant would be a good place to obtain an independent confirmation of your figures and exactly what this documentation fee actually cost you over 47 months

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blondie can you post the two CCA agreements up into this thread, I notice there are no cancellation rights on the agreement and I'm not sure if there is a significance.

 

Post them here ->>Is My Agreement Enforceable - Useful

 

 

Cheers

 

S.

Hi Caggers

Can anyone give me any advice, this is the link to my thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/203669-ccj-copes-solicitors-arrow.html

the agreements i have already attached a couple of posts up

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question - I'm pretty new to this

 

I have a loan that is settled and a credit card that is settled - can I still send for the agreements to see if they are enforeceable - they were taken out in 2000. If so and they are unenforceable can I claim back waht I have already paid them?

 

Thanks

 

mandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick note to say that's two of my HBOS cards unenforceable, as they can't provide the correct paperwork. Even still, they are trying to accuse me of avoiding liability, ie, denying the existence of the debt, which I am not.

 

Be aware of this: it's duplicitous, an attempt to trick you into saying that you don't owe them anything, which they could then use against you at a later date. Choose your words carefully and don't let them trick you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm no expert BUt i think you should also feature on the "documention

 

i think you will find that the courts would say that the inclusion of this for interest charges would make the documentation fee exhorbitantly expensive and as a one off fee should not have been subject to you paying interest on it over 47 months at 32%

 

if this is the case then it makes the whole agreement unenforceable

 

i would suggst and accountant would be a good place to obtain an independent confirmation of your figures and exactly what this documentation fee actually cost you over 47 months

 

Thanks

 

This is a good point. The thing is the documentation fee should never have been treated as part of loan. Do you know if this would could be related to some sort of "unfair terms" law/act?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...