Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

jordash v barclaycard #1 ...... WON


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i wrote to barclaycard for the statements for two credit cards on the 8th of january and the 40 day limit for them was last saturday and they still havn't arrived even though i received a letter for each card dated the 2nd of february from a karen thompson saying that they would have my statements to me within the time limit which should've been saturday just gone.

So i thought id give them untill after the weekend just incase they were in the post but nothing turned up today so i thought id give barclaycard a call asking where they were. They said that they never received the letter until the 2nd of february and that they where using that as the date!!!! which confused me a bit, surely it doesnt take a month to open a letter,? and can they change the date to suit themselves? im sure they'd love that if i said sorry i didnt pay my bill but ive only just got it through the post. Shame i cant give them a penalty charge because their happy to give them out to us for being late.

 

Anyway im just kind of wondering what to do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlueRuby

First of all, don't let the bank set the date to suit themselves! You keep to the date you specified. If you click on the link below you will find a letter (template 3 I think) that you can use. I'm just about to use template 2, so go ahead and sock it to them! :)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a SAR to barclaycard on 10th Jan I had letter saying they were going to fulfil my request within the 40 days however, i received a letter today saying that there is a delay due to the volume of similar requests. They go on to say thta they have made the Information Comissioner's Office aware of the challenges they are facing. They apologise for the delay and assure me that I will get the statements as soon as they can. They finish the letter by saying 'We regret that we are not able to enter into correspondence with you about this issue'

 

I will be sending the non-compliance letter, I think 40days is a reasonable amount of time to get my statements up on the computer system and print them off!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, Ive had similar conversations with CC Co's. I then pull the recorded slips and tell them when it was signed for and (when evailable) who by! That always go down well! ;)

Barclays :- Settled March 07:o

 

RBS:- Acct Discharged May 07 :o (chase for more and CRA deletion???):confused:

Barclaycard: - CCA recieved 24/1/07. WOW! :o (GITS!!!) :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

today i finally received my statements through for two credit card accounts with barclaycard, but before i get the ball rolling with the letters, i just wondered was there a different letter to send for when claiming from a credit card than from a current account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm about to post a slightly modified version of the banks prelim, changing the words in the 'My request' section about refused DDs and overdraft limits to 'late payments, exceeding credit limits and so forth...' and in the 'What I require' section, I've just stated the charges plus the interest (i'm going for contractual) and taken out the word 'overdraft'.

HTH and hope it's OK for me too!

HALIFAX

30th Oct 06 - 18th Jan 07 - Success in claiming £3617.95

HALIFAX 2nd claim

5th Mar - 16th Apr - Success in claiming £176

EGG (3 accounts)

20th Jan 07 - SAR posted

17th Mar 07 - Paperwork received - bits missing

19th Mar - Non-compliance for missing bits posted

9th Apr - ICO complaint filed

BARCLAYCARD

20th Jan 07 - SAR posted

21st Mar - Statements received

23rd Mar - Prelim posted

31st Mar - Offer for £30 rec'd

10th Apr - LBA sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have finally received all of my statements from barclaycard (after about three months) and wrote a letter asking for £612 in charges back.

Today i received a letter from them saying that they will refund the difference between what they charged and £12, which works out at about £240.

I want to refuse this offer because its still about £400 short of what i asked for. If i refuse it, i know it'll probably be a long time after till i see it but i can wait.

This is kind of where i am confused because there isnt a set limit on charges with banks so ive gone for everything, but is it different with credit card charges? can they get away with only refunding the difference or shall i still go for the lot like i would like to?

 

Also i am going to be claiming for my second barclaycard but have heard about claiming contractual interest aswell, any chance someone could explain this a little or provide a link so i can read up on it please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have finally received all of my statements from barclaycard (after about three months) and wrote a letter asking for £612 in charges back.

Today i received a letter from them saying that they will refund the difference between what they charged and £12, which works out at about £240.

I want to refuse this offer because its still about £400 short of what i asked for. If i refuse it, i know it'll probably be a long time after till i see it but i can wait.

This is kind of where i am confused because there isnt a set limit on charges with banks so ive gone for everything, but is it different with credit card charges? can they get away with only refunding the difference or shall i still go for the lot like i would like to?

 

Also i am going to be claiming for my second barclaycard but have heard about claiming contractual interest aswell, any chance someone could explain this a little or provide a link so i can read up on it please?

 

You are entitled to the full amount, this link will help.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

i have received a copy of the defence from barclaycard and with it a notice to say that the AQ has been dispensed with at my local court. What happens now then?

 

Also follows a copy of their defenc, is it any different to what others have had or is this just a standard defence?

 

their defence:

1. barclaycard is a trading division of barclays bank plc and not a legal entity in its own right.

2.the particulars of claim are summary and do not provide details of the account held with the defendant. Accordingly, this defence is summary in nature and the defendant reserves the right to amend this statement of case in due course.

3. to the extent it is alleged that the claimant incurred charges on the claimant's account for unathourised borrowings (whether late payment fees, exceeding overdraft credit limit fees, or any other such fees (the "charges"), the defendant puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and date thereof.

4. The defendants standard terms and conditions ("terms"), which the claimant accepted upon opening the account, entitle the defendant to debit the charges from customer accounts upon certain events (including, but not limited to, exceeding account credit limits and/or unathourised borrowing and/or failing to make sufficiant monthly payments to reduce the account balance by the required date).

5.it is the responsability of the account holder to properly monitor the account so as to ensure compliance, for example, with the obligation to make payments by the required date.

6. the terms gave the claimant a fair and transparent view of the obligations and entitlements set out above, including the basis on which the defendant would be entitled to debit the charges from the claimants account.

7. if, and to the extent it is the claimant's case that the failure to make monthly payments and/or failure to remain within the agreed credit limit, constituted a breach of the terms, and that the contractual entitlement to debit the charges from the claimant's account constitutes a liquidated damages clause, the same is denied. The charges applied to the claimants account were payments that the claimant agreed to make upon the events described by reason of the terms. Accordingly, it is the denied that the charges or any charges constitute unfair and/or unreasonable charges, and it is denied that the legal principles governing the enforceability of liquidated damages clauses applies or is relevant to the charges, as alleged by the claimant, or at all, and/or that the charges are otherwise unenforceable

8. futher or alternatively it is denied that any such charges constitute unlawful penalty charges or are in breach of the unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations 1999, (particularly but without limitation to, paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2), or are in breach of s.4 of the unfair (contracts) terms act 1977 (or any other provision), or are unreasonable within the meaning of s.15 of the supply of goods and services act 1982 (or indeed any other provision).

9. further or alternatively, without prjudice to the matters pleaded above, if the claimants failure to make sufficiant account payments by the required date and/or to remain with a pre agreed credit limits constituted a breach of the terms, the defendant avers that the charges were nonetheless valid and enforcable

10.it is further denied that the charges were unlawfully debited from the claimants account. it is averred that the said charges and interest are and remain lawful and enforceable and that the defendant was entitiled to debit the same.

11. accordingly, it is averrd that the charges are legally enforceable and the defendant was entitled to debit the charge from the claimants account.

12. the defendant denies that it is liable to the claimant for the sums calimed and interest, as pleaded or at all.

13. in the alternative, and without prejudice to matters stated above, if (which is denied) the said charges or any part thereof are unlawful or unenforceable as alleged by the claimant or at all, and the charges were a consequence of the breach of contract by the claimant, the defendant has nonetheless suffered loss and damage as a consequenceof such breach of contract by failing to make monthly payments and/or failing to remain within the agreeed credit limit. accordingly, in the event that the defendant is unable to rely on its express entitlement to enforce the charges as set out above, it will seek to reover to the extent necessary such loss and damage as it actually suffered, which will not necessarily be limited to the valueof the said charges, and the defendant seeks to set off such sums against any liabilty owed hereunder to the claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi three. exactly same stage as i am, see troodles below your thread. No idea what to do now and no replies to my query as yet. i think its in your interest to try to get hold of t& cs, but i havent got them as yet. Totally lost at the moment so at least were in the same boat, (without a paddle!!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i see yeah, its thrown me a little because where i claimed before against barclays i had to complete an AQ and this time i dont. do i now just wait for a court date?

and secondly it was against their bank last time not barclaycard so im just wondering if this is a standard defence that has been entered

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I received the same for Barclays Bank but last week I received a order from the Court to submit the list of charges before the 7/6 if not the claim will be strike out so I deliver in hand to the courts the list of charges again and recorded delivery to the solicitors . The receptionist at the Court asked somebody there and they told me that in 5 days I will get a court date. So you can send them again the list of charges as if you look at the beginning of the defence they state that the particulars of claim "do not provide particulars of the precise charges alleged" etc etc. and also to the Solicitors so you dont have to wait again.

I will be doing the same for Barclaycard.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats exactly what they want

:-x To drive you mad enough to the point where you give up:-x

 

Dont whatever you do....

Send your list of charges and wait for date....Dispensing of the AQ seems nothing to worry about...Keep asking your questions and somebody more knowledgeable than me will be along soon to answer your question about

Barclays/Barclaycard

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your support everyone, I will keep updating not received anything yet from court do I just wait or send my list of charges when they send me the court location ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Def wait for the court date i had exactly the same letter i just ignored it as it was all a load of rubbish to me just a waste of paper, then just as i was going to contact the courts i had a letter from them saying they will proceed with the court proceedings im yet to recieve a date but fingers crossed it will go in my favour!

Nationwide Won - £2000 :D

Barclay Card - Hearing Date 14/08/07 :???:

Capital One - N1 Filed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats exactly what they want

:-x To drive you mad enough to the point where you give up:-x

 

Dont whatever you do....

Send your list of charges and wait for date....Dispensing of the AQ seems nothing to worry about...Keep asking your questions and somebody more knowledgeable than me will be along soon to answer your question about

Barclays/Barclaycard

 

Thanks for that. I will send a list of charges asap. The bank already has the charges from the initial letters i sent them, requesting refunds. More fool me for expecting them to give copies to their solicitors. Should i send charges to the court as well, even though they havent requested them ?

Will keep all informed, in mean time any news/tips would be helpful.

8) head now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi emmanuel 159 It would be good if you could start your own thread...

emmanuel 159 V Barclays...Or as you choose..

Tell us what stage you are at and you questions will be answered much quicker and clearer as they wont be confused with other threads...

Good luck.. Everybody is behind you..;)

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I have too received a defence from Barclaycard with exactly the same standard wording. I was wondering, do we follow the procedure where although the AQ is dispensed, we actually send in the Draft Order for Allocation Questionnaires (bankfodder's post)???

I have set up my own thread but want same answers as you guys. Good luck all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

following my letter from the courts last week saying that the aq should be dispensed with, i received another letter today, this time from my local court and to my surprise there was an AQ in the envelope for which i have taken to the court this morning.

has anyone else a letter saying that the AQ should be dispensed with and then later received one through the post??

 

Also is the defence that barclaycard entered standard for eveyone? i only ask because point 1 has got me a little worried that i have put the wrong name on the claim. can someone clear this up for me as i am to submit a different claim for another barclaycard i hold and wouldnt want to file it incorrectly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...