Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lost My Kilt Jacket!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6096 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So does that give the company to ask for huge sums of money to replace missing item? (General question, I have absolutely no idea how much it costs to replace a kilt jacket;) !)

 

They could claim for the cost of a new jacket, minus depreciation for the age of the lost jacket.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd probably have to be a like-for-like replacement, with, as I said, less for the age and general wear of the original jacket. That's something for the court to decide IMHO - claimant gives their idea of cost and justification for this assertion, defendant does the same for their own idea and justification, and then the judge decides what's fair.

 

Damn, this'd be right up rosiecotton's street :)

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I paid £10 when I ordered it. Then the rest the day I picked it up. I am willing to pay £100. They said it would cost £280 to buy a new one! but thats a "new" one. And I did not sign anything saying I would be liable to buy a brand new one! what a mess I have got myself in !

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not liable for a new one unless you were the first person to hire the jacket in question. As I said above, you would be liable for the cost of a new one, minus depreciation (so how old the jacket was, plus how many people are likely to have hired it), and minus the money you paid on the deposit (which I'm assuming now adds up to £45?)

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son runs a formal wear hire department for well known High Street store and has advised of their policy.

 

Accidental Damage is covered up to £200.00. ie. Cigarette Burn or Drink Spill.

 

Loss of garments are not covered by insurance and remain the responsibility of the hirer.

 

Their normal charge for the loss of a jacket would be approximately a further payment of 80% of the original outfit hire charge.

 

Think yourself lucky it wasn't the Kilt as this would be Two to three times the outfit hire charge had it been lost.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest weegirl
Think yourself lucky it wasn't the Kilt as this would be Two to three times the outfit hire charge had it been lost.

 

That would have been a sight to see - especially if you wear your kilt like a true Scot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can call the police, but since it's a civil matter, I doubt that they'd get involved.

 

However, just in case, if you haven't yet, you really should report the jacket as stolen from the club and get a crime number.

 

I would also stop communicating by phone, and start getting things in writing. I think the important thing here is to get them to produce their T&Cs and take it from there, and people yelling at one another over the phone is not going to help anyone.

 

FWIW, my personal opinion is that if they are not insured for the loss/theft of this type of item, you should be liable for the cost of replacement for a like for like (bearing in mind age/condition of said jacket) on top of what you paid for the hire (since yougot the benefit of that anyway).

 

Careful of getting this dragged on for longer than necessary, though. It might be arguable that whilst they don't have the jacket or a replacement, they could claim loss from you. After all, it's wedding season and rented kilt jackets are probably being hired out a lot at the moment, so they are effectively minus one jacket to hire and at £45 a pop, it will soon mount up, and if it were my shop, my jackets, I would definitely claim that off the person who hasn't returned the item.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes m8! now its making sense! lol...

 

How could I get a rough idea of that cost though? ...

 

Do you think £100 is a fair sum to give?

 

 

I do, if you've already given them £45. Make them an offer.

 

Have you contacted the police?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've told you what to do! :-)

 

1) Call the police to report theft - Looks like you have done that, but ifit were me, I would have gone down to the station, because around here, if you wait for them to turn up, you could be growing moss round your bare Scottish butt before they do. (A friend of mine got a bullet put through her windscreen outside her house, she found the bullet in her headrest, that was 6 weeks ago, she hasn't even had a return phonecall!) But it might be different where you are, I don't know.

 

2) Contact the shop and ask them to provide you with a copy of their T&Cs. For this purpose, I would suggest you write to them, so that you start laying a paper trail to show that you are not just ignoring them. Say that you are not prepared to just pay up whatever they say simply because they say so, so you want a) a copy of their T&Cs relating to hire and loss/damage to items, b) a quote for the replacement of a like for like jacket in relation to age and condition of the lost jacket from their usual suppliers. Tell them that you do not take kindly to their intimidatory threats of involving the police when you have tried to maintain an open dialogue with them all along ( I hope that's true!), and to desist from such behaviour. Tell them that you will contact them once they have complied with your request for information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes well over the phone they say it will cost £280 for a new jacket and they will let me off with £190? so If I do all this they might get mean and ask for the £280?

 

surely it cant cost all that when my mate bought a kilt for £250 which was much nicer than the 1 I had and that was for the full kilt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind what they say over the phone!

 

Look, you can sit here and worry about what MIGHT happen, or you can type that letter likeI have just told you and get it sent off, and actually start dealing with this the right way.

 

At the moment, I am sorry to say, you are having a case of the "I wish..." and it's not going to help you.

 

You can keep worrying at it or you can do something to make things move forward, up to you. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I had the police at my door last night. They were shocked at the companies attitude (nasty on phone) and about the charges (£190) they were trying to put on me. They said they will give me a crime reference number to take into the shop so they can claim on their insurance.

 

I also phoned up a kilt company who stated the maximum they charge for loss of jacket is £80. I am going into the shop to have a scan at terms and conditions today.

 

Could be interesting (hope they dont try and attack me)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...