Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well Tuesday morning dawned, and I have never been so nervous in my life, not even presenting a tv programme broadcast around the world!, I could not find my rescue remedy anywhere. I took a small spitfire model with me as my dad was a WW2 pilot and a lawyer, so I had his spirit with me. The drive was a nightmare as I just could not concentrate.

 

Arrived and was shaking so much I could hardly write the name tag!! The meeting started, and I asked the chap what he knew about my case, and gave me all the guff about it being a mistake, and how this particular bailiff had made a genuine mistake and was a very experianced. When I stated that I did not beleive he had actually been to my front door, he produced his computer print out, saying it was a semidetached house with a white pvc front door - gosh well you could see that from the road. Even when I challenged him that he would have had to walk pass the only car that actually belonged to me and had not noted down the registration plate. When it came to the second visit even the guy from the council said he doubted that he ever visited!!!! Bailiff man was very patronising and then changed tack when he realised how much I knew about his company and the law.

 

We then discussed about the TCE bill, and used my case as an illustration of why it is flawed, the chap said that he felt that it was very unlikely that they would ever enter and remove goods, and his reasoning for this was the expense and that it was not a cost effective method. From this discussion I get the feeling that removal of cars and clamping will increase dramatically. I also asked what I should do if I hear of any of this companies bailiffs stating that a new law had been introduced and using this to get money. He said to email him immediatley. Not much use if you dont have the name!!!!

 

I then challenged him regarding the disparity of paying by debit card and credit card. He said that it was justifiable and actual cost as it cost them money to process card payments, I countered that why should someone who pays by debit card pay the bulk of the cost when they have the monies there and then but someone paying on a credit card pays a much smaller proportion and they have to wait for the money. The man from the council agreed with me and said that he wanted a dramatic difference when they retender for the contract next year as would all the other companies he was asking to tender. Dont think BG was particularly pleased by this! I will be asking Council to make it a flat fee for debit cards as with every other business. I mentioned the OFT Guidance to collection as he has a lincence he said that it did not apply to bailiff work it was only for debt collection. I mentioned that it was actually the OFT that pointed me to several sections regarding this and were at present looking into this case, he said Oh well I think they will regard these charges as actual and reasonable. Ermm we will have to wait and see. So though not sorted completely this is quite a fundamental change that we are closer to getting a fairer payment system.

 

He then tried to be really nice when he said he would be paying me back my money as an act of goodwill (WTF) and I said please pay it direct to the council as it was enough to pay my next two months council tax. Council man took a note of this, so if they dont pay, the council will have to chase the bailiffs for my council tax money!! It is a present 5 days overdue!!!!

 

At the end of the meeting I told him that I was Form 4ing his bailiff and he got really aggresive, "So you want him to lose his ticket, he will never work as a bailiff again, what is your motivation?" To which I replied that the work that I have had to do since May 3 the stress that it has put me through how it has put my health at risk and strain on my marriage. He replied "Well no damage was done and we did not get in your house, if you do then we will get our lawyers in and I tell you we will fully defend my bailiff!" Council man was a bit shocked and said something along the lines that if this was the only recourse that I had then I did have the right to do it. To be honest part of me things that this bailiff has got notes on his certificate, cos taking it away is the ultimate the judge can do, I think if he is clean all he would get is a telling off and me a small amount of compo.

 

The meeting went on for two hours I was knackered but felt that it was positive, the whole process will take time but we seem to have a good foundation.

 

So next step is too try and work out a plan of checks and balances that we can put to the council but I will not be doing this till september as I value my marriage too much:-D

 

I am sure there is loads I have forgotten so will post it later, sorry it is so long!

 

Sfx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Saffron....you are a star :D

I hope the council Man realised what kind of people the bailiffs are when the head honcho threatened you with solicitors etc in the PRESENCE of the council man as a witness:roll:

 

If he can do that under the circumstances of the meeting, surely it must indicate what else they get up with no officials watching:evil:

 

Anyway Well done again, go and get a nice glass of wine and congratulate yourself on a job well done :)

 

Love and hugs

 

Dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Herbie

Well done Saffron. I will ring you during the week.

 

What bailiffs must realise is that they have a very priveldged role. In this they are allowed BY LAW to come into your home ( by peaceful means of course) and list items that they can take if you do not pay them. No debt collector in the country is allowed to do this. In addition when collecting Magistrate Court FINES they have the right to break into your home. Therefore if they do not carry out their role correctly there must be some method of complaint.

 

From years of experience clients have found that complaints to the bailiff companies are useless with the same applying to the local authorities.

 

The option open to complain about a certificated bailiff is a Form 4 complaint that must be made to the court that granted the certificate. The bailiff is fully aware that this method of reddress is available and he can avoid it by sticking to the law. It is that simple.

 

Yes, there is a strong possibility that the bailiff will lose his employment. But that could have been avoided. It must be understood that nearly all cases that go to the courts on a Form 4 are becasue of excessive overcharging to both vulnerable groups and those who are ignorant of the legal fee scale.

 

In a nutshell, the bailiff is being GREEDY.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The option open to complain about a certificated bailiff is a Form 4 complaint that must be made to the court that granted the certificate. The bailiff is fully aware that this method of reddress is available and he can avoid it by sticking to the law. It is that simple.

 

Yes, there is a strong possibility that the bailiff will lose his employment. But that could have been avoided. It must be understood that nearly all cases that go to the courts on a Form 4 are becasue of excessive overcharging to both vulnerable groups and those who are ignorant of the legal fee scale.

 

In a nutshell, the bailiff is being GREEDY.

 

It's actually worse than that ... they are taking advantage of vulnerable people who are at their weakest.

 

They are vultures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, vultures are pretty fascinating, and above all, intelligent, one of Earth's most intelligent aves! I'd liken them to remora fish - they think they're bigger than they are, they're all mouth, and they like to latch on and take you for a ride.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, vultures are pretty fascinating, and above all, intelligent, one of Earth's most intelligent aves! I'd liken them to remora fish - they think they're bigger than they are, they're all mouth, and they like to latch on and take you for a ride.

:eek::lol: I giggled at that but how right you are

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well received a phone call from Honcho man yesterday saying - he was surprsied that I had gone down the form 4 route and asking what I wanted to acheive - he said that they had compensated me, to which I said no you are refunding the incorrect charges. Surprise surprise he has not to date refunded them!! So I am in arrears on my council tax and the Head of Revenue is having to chase his bailiffs for it!!!!

 

He says he will call me back today, part of me wants to know how much he would pay me to withdraw the complaint - don't know what to do.

 

SFx

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally i would check again if he has paid, and if not persuade your council to seek a liability order against him.:D..now wouldn't that just bugger up his certificate..

I'm sure SX you will know what to do,you have so far given out enough good advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

*BIG HUG*

 

Oh saffron I'm so sorry to hear you are still up to the eyes with this bunch of idiots.:x

 

It seemed after your meeting you were getting somewhere, but keep your chin up and as setmefree says you have an increadible knack of finding solutions for everyone elses problems so I'm sure you will come up trumps for this new twist in your battle.

 

I wish I couold suggest something to help but I'm at a loss :(

 

However, if you want to talk (even if its about big Brother) to take your mind of things just give me a shout

 

Love and hugs Dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the most fascinating thread I've read on CAG so far.

Subscribing.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...