Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just an update, finance company rejected my complaint saying they've found damage but can't tell when it's from even though I've shown them how the front end is misaligned in the advert photos compared to another identical model car they're selling.  Dealership now want to charge me to get the car brought back to me but will only discuss over the phone which seems off. They're also saying no damaged was picked up by JLR main dealership before I purchased it but my local JLR dealerships till this day haven't mentioned the damage to me because they don't go into stuff like that for some reason lol  Ombudsman case is still open, not sure if I should leave the car with them or just pay to have it brought back.
    • Hi all, I get esa and pip,  I have £1200 in arrears that I owed my ex partner, I have been paying £100 per month to clear this debt that was setup by standing order, as I have complex needs I forgot about this standing order and have overpaid mainternance by around £4000, I told CSA I am happy for my ex partner to keep overpayment I do not wish to seek anything back, however they have declined to take of the sum of £1200 and are still saying I owe this to my ex partner. In my second question it was announced that pip would stop for mental health, I don't understand the link below Disability benefits system to be reviewed as PM outlines "moral mission" to reform welfare - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK The Prime Minister has outlined a package of sweeping reforms to put work at the heart of welfare and... Does this mean my money is going to stop? I have spoken to my key worker and I am already recieveing help from mental health team and complex needs team along with connections and mind, I just don't get what is going on.
    • No, i haven't had one for about 10+ years. I am thinking of just going to the court in person and pay at the counter
    • I’m pleased to report the dealer has provided a full refund. He admits the vehicle wasn’t as described. This now closes the matter  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lose the Shabbey Habit


boston3603
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I have just been reading boston3603 hardship case and I am in a similar position with abbey and I am looking for some advice/help. It has been such a long time since I posted here I am a bit confused and lost in the whole forums, so I hoping some one could help me through it please.

 

At present my claim is stayed at derby county court for £8212 (as of last year). I have just received a letter from abbey saying that they are taking away my £1200 overdraft as from 1st Jan 2009. Once they do this I will be in deep dodo. I have been off work for the last 3 years because I had spinal surgery and I am only on half pay, so there is still around £1000 per month going into my account. I am slowly drowning and i don't know where to go now. Mortgage & other stuff is is starting to slip and when my O/D is taken away I will be left -£1200 down. Only ay I can see to resolve it is for me to put in a hardship case. Do I send this to abbey, the court or the FSA? Please help.

 

I've also started a new thread so I don't take over bostons thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

After ringing up to ask why our plea for hardship was taking so long, next day got a letter saying we are not considered hardup enough which is why as from this friday, we will be applying for BR.:evil: I am seriously thinking now of telling them to reconsider as we will be BR soon. So although we wont get back the 11000 the bstards owe us, neither will abbey get back the 3000 OD. I stopped paying all my creditors last month, including payments to reduce the OD. For every 15 quid I paid, they slapped on OD service charge of 15.00:rolleyes: If you can, you have to ask what frightens you more. Staying in this situation and have the feckers squeeze the life out of you or go BR....although it is much easier for me as I do not own my home. Keep reading through this place...it is fab and you will find loads of support and inspiration.:)

I wish you all the very best.

Hazel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I have read in the paper today that the banks have been given yet another six months grace to sort themselves out. They are putting off paying out by appealing here there and everywhere. They are still however hammering people with charges and being allowed to do so. Something has to give surely.:x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read in the paper today that the banks have been given yet another six months grace to sort themselves out. They are putting off paying out by appealing here there and everywhere. They are still however hammering people with charges and being allowed to do so. Something has to give surely.:x

It's called the FSA Waiver which has simply been extended since the OFT Test case issues have not yet been completed.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Well, we're waiting to make sure that - when we go back to the court to rescue our stayed claims -we have all of the information so that we need.

 

 

 

The good people of CAG are working hard behind the scenes, we just need to be patient for a little bit longer. I'm sure that when the new information is ready there'll be an announcement!

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...