Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wanted to thank whomever fixed my post, I just read some other people with similar problems and sorry I should have done the spacing and alignment of text before posting.  I will make sure to keep it clean and proper for following posts. Thank you for fixing the initial post. 
    • Haven't got time to look at the moment but I will later this evening.   At least you probably have something that can be submitted as a last resort - if needed,   Let's see what FTMDave has to say when he's back from football
    • Go to the slc website See if you can register and look at your file on their portal we have found lots of people can still view their stuff.    
    • See if this is in order please. I photo of the chimney and Hale Surveys remaining.   Bundle 24 JanM.pdf
    • Hi all,  A good friend of mine recently had a similar issue and this is my first car. I've had a consistent barrage of problems.  I purchased a vehicle from Beavers Cars Dealership - From Auto Trader.  This is a draft I've written: Dear Beavers Cars, I'm writing to you about the Audi A4 (2007) I bought from you for £3200 on Sunday January 09 2022. The vehicle had prior faults before purchasing the car, during the test drive the Engine Light came on.   This being my first car as I've recently only passed my driving test, Amir who dealt with me re-assured me that this fault is nothing serious. I phoned a friend who advised me that this is a major fault and that needs to be looked at.   Amir took me to a local garage 1 minute from the Offices and had a mechanic he knew inspect this fault. The mechanic advised that the throttle flaps are shown as an error code on his machine and need to be cleaned, he took the throttle flap device off to clean it, the fault still persisted, he replaced the entire unit which then cleared the fault. I spent roughly 3 hours in the garage trying to resolve the fault error codes. I then was shown that these codes were cleared and that its all now in good condition and working.   only test drove this vehicle at maximum of 40mphs and as it was central London taking it on the motorway was a long way away. I paid a £200 deposit initially on Saturday the 8th January 2022 and went to London on 9th January 2022 to check this car. Once everything was sorted at the time, I was convinced by a sales pitch of Amir that this car is road safe and I'm able to drive it back to Brighton with no issues. I paid the remaining £3000.   Upon leaving to the motorway, the engine was struggling and it was making a very seriously bad noise, the turbo was not picking up properly and it really felt like there may be something seriously wrong with the car, when I would pull up to roundabouts the car revs would flicker and the car would shake.   I then had it serviced and got a Carbon Clean on the engine and everything seems to be in order, it started to drive a little better, but I barely ever gone over 40mph.   I wanted to speak with Amir to discuss this and tried calling on the 20th January 2022, knowing I still have my rights under the Consumer Act 2015, but wanted to address the issues and find a solution. I was unable to get hold of him.   The third time I went onto the motorway on 22/01/2022 after going around 65mph the Revs just went to 5 and my car started to slow down, I was not able to push more than 35mph in a 70mph, which almost caused a collision. I luckily was only 20 minutes away from home and was able to come off the Motorway and get home safely.   During some of the inspections that I had the engineers that Amir took me to by Beavers Cars dealership is called Speedy's Autos. He said that the car is road safe and being a mechanic shop re-assured me.   Since I had the car, the drivers seat-belt would unclip from time to time, I was told the tread on my left front tire is below the legal limit. I've had the sensors, electrics and front and rear brake lights needing replacements by what it sounds like the Turbo completely went   and I should not have been allowed to drive this car back to Brighton. It put me and others at risk especially when they knew I've only just got my drivers licence and was still a new driver.   I would like a full refund for the £3200, I've already spent money on a set of new tyres, wheel alignment and brand new brake pads and brake disks and a repair on the seat buckle luckily the parts can be returned and wheels aren't due to be fitted until Monday 24/01/2022.   I've also already paid for Road Tax, Parking Permit and insurance on this car which I will have to sort out. . The Consumer Rights Act 2015 makes it an implied term of the contract I have with Beavers Cars that goods be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality. As you are in breach of contract and I've owned the vehicle for less than 6 years, I am within my statutory rights to ask for a refund at no further cost to me. I look forward to hearing from you within 14 days with details of how you plan to resolve this matter. Yours sincerely,   ........................     Any help would be appreciated.  I've sent this over to them via text to Amir who I been dealing with from Beaver Cars in Hounslow - I do not have an email for them.    Amir Beavers Cars 61 – 67 Salisbury Road Hounslow Middlesex TW4 7NW Dear Sir/Madam Ref: xxxxxx On 09/01/2022 I purchased, and took delivery of, the above vehicle an Audi A4 Avant 2007 from you. On 22/01/2022 I discovered that it was not of satisfactory quality: the turbo cut out and car would not go over 40 mph, even after restarting.   The Consumer Rights Act 2015 requires dealers to supply goods that are fit for purpose, as described and of satisfactory quality. However, the vehicle is clearly not roadworthy. You are therefore in breach of contract.   I am legally entitled to reject the vehicle and to be reimbursed the original purchase of £3200. I look forward to receiving your cheque or banks transfer refund to my account: xxxxxx – Account Number: XXXXXXXX Sort-code: XXXXXX the total sum of £3200 within 14 days. If you fail to reimburse me, I shall have no alternative but to issue a claim against you in the county court for recovery of the money without further reference to you. Yours faithfully   If they refuse to refund me, what would be my next steps? Thank you
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

struck out TSB bank charges HELP


paul283
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

hope you can help? just heard from court that they have struck my claim out to retrieve my bank charges from Lloyds TSB. I thought that I sent everything that was asked for but then they sent me an order again asking for particulars of the claim specifying a list of all charges complained of showing the date and amount of each one and the stated reason for it. This I thought I did. I'm not sure if I understood what was asked of me but next thing I have a reply today dated 9th July 07 stating it was struck out. Can you help in telling me what I need to do now and whether the information I am supplying is correct and what they want?

Unfortunately, I need help urgently as I only have a couple of days to reply. Thanks alot.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul, as your case is in Birmingham you need to PM Gary H, he will give you further help as how to procede.

Good Luck:D

Birmingham County Court

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

hope you can help? just heard from court that they have struck my claim out to retrieve my bank charges from Lloyds TSB. I thought that I sent everything that was asked for but then they sent me an order again asking for particulars of the claim specifying a list of all charges complained of showing the date and amount of each one and the stated reason for it. This I thought I did. I'm not sure if I understood what was asked of me but next thing I have a reply today dated 9th July 07 stating it was struck out. Can you help in telling me what I need to do now and whether the information I am supplying is correct and what they want?

Unfortunately, I need help urgently as I only have a couple of days to reply. Thanks alot.

 

Paul

Nobody will be able to tell you if what you supplied was correct if you don't show us what the court asked for!

 

Can you post up the order's from the court please? The one which asked for further information and the one which informed you the claim was struck out.

 

Also please show us exactly what you provided in response to the first.

 

All may not be lost but you need to act quickly.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary

This is the first order i recieved was

Unless the claiment by 4pm on may 16th 2007 files at court and serves on the defendant further written particulars of the claim specifying the name,account number and sorting code of the account referred to,and a list of all the charges complained of showing the date and the amount of each one and the stated reason for it,the claim shall stand struck out without further order.

 

I sent them a list of charges set out the way requested by the order.

 

Then i recieved another order stating

Upon reading the court file it is noted

1.The documents filed at court by the claimant on 14th may 2007 do not comply with the order on 24th april 2007 besause

 

a)they do not appear to have been sent to the defendant as required.correspondence with the defendant before the claim was issued is not sufficient to clarify before the court.

b)the list of charges attached does not specify the reason given for each charge.it appears from the amounts that many of the charges may be for interest,which is not a matter apparently within the complaints made in the particulars of claim.

 

 

So i sent another list of charges without the interest on and specifyed what each charge was for and the amount and the date as requested by the first order.These were sent to the court and the defendant recorded delivery.

 

 

Then recieved this on monday 9th july

Upon the claimant having failed to provide the defendant with the further particulars of the claim required by the order of 24th april 2007 and 30th may 2007.

it is ordered that

1.claim stands struck out.

2.this order has been made by the court of its own initiative under cpr3.3.any party affected by this order may apply to have it set aside,varied or stayed within 7 days of the date on which the order is served on that party.

 

 

hope this helps

cheers paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...