Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jackdaniels vs B.O.S


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok here is the state of play - thanks to everyone who has helped me through the months :)

 

i sent in my S.A.R request on the 29th March - after 44 days there was no reply from bank of scotland.

 

on the 8th of May i sent my non compliance letter and received all of my statements on the 1st of June

 

i then sent my prelim letter on the 4th of june asking for my charges to be repayed - in which i received my standard rejection letter on the 9th June.

 

on the 11th June i sent the L.B.A and heard nothing back

 

on the 6th of june i got another bank charge for a failed DD which sent my account into minus 39 quid , so an unauthorised overdraft was sure to follow , this gave me rage because i dont get paid for a while, my working tax credit is needed to get me to work, they would have took it when it went in and i wouldnt have been able to go to work, so this got me fired up.

 

i phoned the bank , told them my circumstances and the nice woman on the phone reversed the charge as goodwill gesture but said i would still get the ovwerdraft charge put on next month

 

then i phoned customer services and asked for my case to be re evaluated as i didnt agree with their "investigation" and that i was not entitled to my bank charges back - she said it was no problem and that she actually had my L.B.A letter in her pile , she too was really helpful and said the standard time for a reply is 8 weeks but this gets backdated depending on the date they receive the L.B.A, which was 4 weeks ago, so she said i will have a reply within a couple of weeks.

 

so here is hoping!!!! im claiming back about £860 , i'll keep you all posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at about the same stage as you in my claim. Sent letter asking for my charges back on the 28th May, got normal reject letter on the 9th June. I then sent off my LBA on the 12th June giving 14 days. Once the 14 days had expired I called them and was told I could go on and proceed court proceedings if I wanted to. They too said That the 40 days is taken from the date they receive the first letter. On second phonecall nice lady said my claim had been escalated and I should be a little patient as there was a huge backlog. She said a senior review manager would be likely to call me to negotiate a settlement in the newt week or two. Dont know if this was a delay tactic but am waiting my time patiently till around pay day when I will commence court action.

Holding thumbs for you and hope to hear good news from you soon.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i agree mate, the advice on here is goldust and everyone is really helpful.

 

ahh, so we both at same stage, this should be interesting cause she said the same thing on phone to me, (that my case was getting passed to the review manager) - although she never hinted to the fact that he would phone me with an offer.... im determined to get full amount and i know they will try to get me to settle for half.

 

i wish you all the luck in the world mate, hopefully you will be enjoying a lump sum very soon :) - you'll have to let us know when you receive that phone call

Link to post
Share on other sites

also...

 

 

yep thats another reason why ive been stalling, they had received my L.B.A but i had not heard anything back about it and i couldnt file a court action because ive no money for the court fee until i get paid - i just read on money saving expert that people were phoning customer services to ask for a re evaluation so thought id give it a try... after doing it myself and reading about everyone else that is doing it i would highly recommend to anyone that before you file anything with the court, just give them a phone and see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice lady said my claim had been escalated and I should be a little patient as there was a huge backlog. She said a senior review manager would be likely to call me to negotiate a settlement in the newt week or two.

 

THAT MEANS YOU ARE GOING TO BE A WINNER!!!!!!!

It's not a delaying tactic (FOR ONCE!)

 

Keep checking your account!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

she said the same thing on phone to me, (that my case was getting passed to the review manager) - although she never hinted to the fact that he would phone me with an offer.... im determined to get full amount and i know they will try to get me to settle for half.

 

Ha! ANOTHER WINNER coming up!

 

they will pay in approximately half and send you the *THIS IS OUR FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT* letter.

 

But it's not a full and final settlement - they know that - but more importantly - SO DO YOU!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jack daniels made me very ill once. Just thought id share that with u. ;-)

[COLOR=royalblue]Halifax......WON 16/7/07 :D [/COLOR] [COLOR=red]Nationwide...WON 16/7/07 :D [/COLOR] [CENTER][URL="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/sections187and45/"][B][SIZE=4]Please sign this Downing Street petition on Bank Charges and Benefits[/SIZE][/B][/URL][/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help? I logged a small claim here in scotland with the B.O.S - The return date is today however i have spoken to the courts and they have not responded, what do i do now ?????

 

 

First - you should start your own thread. ;)

 

That way we can monitor your prgress.

 

 

But here's where you find the answer to your question : it is #7

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

 

Go for it!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I know,

 

I left half of my face behind on a paving slab that time :(

[COLOR=royalblue]Halifax......WON 16/7/07 :D [/COLOR] [COLOR=red]Nationwide...WON 16/7/07 :D [/COLOR] [CENTER][URL="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/sections187and45/"][B][SIZE=4]Please sign this Downing Street petition on Bank Charges and Benefits[/SIZE][/B][/URL][/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK, heres the state of play again - phoned up customer services again this morning after hearing nothing and the guy told me that a letter was sent to me on the 21st of July offering half the amount i was asking for and that it had been paid into my account

 

I CHECKED - IT WAS - OMG!!! OVER £300

 

he asked me if i wasnt happy i could discuss it with the review manager, i said yes and he said that she will have to look over my case again and phone me in a couple of hours with a full and final offer

 

the suspense is killing me !!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know if you get the call.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they never phoned me back, typical!!! ok so i know how this call is gonna go, they are basically gonna offer me 75% of the claim because that is now their policy, they cant offer or negotiate to give you any more - if i want the full amount now i will need to go the court route

 

 

any ideas?? words of wisdom? .. would be appreciated as i dunno whether i shouuld accept it or not, when they offer!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why settle for anything less that the FULL ammount?

 

Write yourself a note on what you want to say - read it to them if nessasary.

 

You want 100% returned or you will continue with your claim through the courts. You will get it all back, they are just trying it on with you - don't let them fob you off.

 

Good luck and stay calm and possitive.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

but if their policy is to offer 75% and do not have authorisation to give me full amount then they wont, no matter what is say on the phone.... my flatmate is at the same stage as me and she phoned up this morning to reject her offer of half , and they wouldnt budge from the 75% mark. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol, i forgot to say - this is their true policy, not just what they are trying to say to folk on the phone to fob them off - thats the dilemma, i can either take the 75% and have it now, or continue with courts and it'll be another long wait and there might be a lot of uncertainties

 

aaaaargh!!!!! lol

 

thanks moneyhelp :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on you which ever you decide will be the right decission.

 

But if you go the full way, we are all behind you, and will help you.

 

So like Noel say.......Deal or no deal....:p

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...